http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx6J6jh1Dzo
http://youtu.be/Dx6J6jh1Dzo
and Geronimo don't worry about seeing beauty....its when you see ugliness you gotta worry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx6J6jh1Dzo
http://www.heaven.net.nz/answers/answer16.htm
http://www.celestialhealing.net/physicalveg3.htm
When you look at the comparison between herbivores and humans, we compare much more closely to herbivores than meat eating animals. Humans are clearly not designed to digest and ingest meat.
Meat-eaters: have claws
Herbivores: no claws
Humans: no claws
Meat-eaters: have no skin pores and perspire through the tongue
Herbivores: perspire through skin pores
Humans: perspire through skin pores
Meat-eaters: have sharp front teeth for tearing, with no flat molar teeth for grinding
Herbivores: no sharp front teeth, but flat rear molars for grinding
Humans: no sharp front teeth, but flat rear molars for grinding
Meat-eaters: have intestinal tract that is only 3 times their body length so that rapidly decaying meat can pass through quickly
Herbivores: have intestinal tract 10-12 times their body length.
Humans: have intestinal tract 10-12 times their body length.
Meat-eaters: have strong hydrochloric acid in stomach to digest meat
Herbivores: have stomach acid that is 20 times weaker than that of a meat-eater
Humans: have stomach acid that is 20 times weaker than that of a meat-eater
Meat-eaters: salivary glands in mouth not needed to pre-digest grains and fruits.
Herbivores: well-developed salivary glands which are necessary to pre-digest grains and fruits
Humans: well-developed salivary glands, which are necessary to pre-digest, grains and fruits
Meat-eaters: have acid saliva with no enzyme ptyalin to pre-digest grains
Herbivores: have alkaline saliva with ptyalin to pre-digest grains
Humans: have alkaline saliva with ptyalin to pre-digest grains
Based on a chart by A.D. Andrews, Fit Food for Men, (Chicago: American Hygiene Society, 1970
madlookin wrote:
have a read of this...sumink to get your claws into.....oh....i forgot,we aint got any![]()
Findings from this meta-analysis indicate that processed meat consumption is positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Red meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in men. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
1.618 wrote:Anyhow, this just out
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/bjc2011585a.htmlFindings from this meta-analysis indicate that processed meat consumption is positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Red meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in men. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THIODWTqx5E
1.618 wrote:That is a harsh video my friend, but much needed for those with no knowledge of the true methods of processing of their foods.
Would you have felt the same way about human flesh if you had been vegetarian since birth and never even tasted meat? i doubt it.... it's just residual programming, it'll go in time
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests