Cordless Phones In Home A Danger

[garbal]

And the eating of the beef?

rarely, im not keen on it

[dmgc01]

http://www.naturalnews.com/032480_cell_ ... ealth.html

(NaturalNews) An influential European committee known as the Council of Europe has ruled that cell phones and wireless internet connections pose a risk to human health and should subsequently be banned from schools. The committee concluded that immediate action was necessary to protect the children from the potential dangers, releasing a report that acts as a call to arms. The decision comes after mounting evidence has linked mobile phones, in addition to electromagnetic fields, to a number of harsh health ailments. With such a powerful group calling for bans on harmful electronics, it is highly possible that it will not only become law in the European Union, but across the globe as well.

In the committee's report, parallels were drawn between mobile phones and previous items thought to be safe by the mainstream media community. The report warns against repeating mistakes that were made due to the slow medical recognition of toxic substances such as asbestos, tobacco smoking and lead in petrol. Studies, along with the backing of many experts, have generated evidence that cell phones may be the asbestos of the future -- the sleeping toxic health giant. Going beyond mobile phones, the report also highlighted the dangers of common household electronics such as cordless telephones and baby monitors. Both pieces of technology rely on similar technology and have become commonplace among citizens of the EU and abroad. The report also discusses the numerous studies conducted on the health consequences of such technologies.

In addition, a multinational study conducted by the World Health Organization found that heavy mobile phone usage significantly increases the risk of brain and salivary gland tumors. The research was expansive, involving 12,800 people in 13 countries between 2000 and 2004. The results were both accepted into a mainstream scientific journal and were also quite telling of the dangers associated with cell phone risk. This study, however, is but one of many studies linking mobile phone use to tumors. Research led by Dr Siegal Sadetzki, an epidemiologist at Gertner Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israel, found that those who heavily use their cell phone had a 50% higher risk of developing a parotid tumor. A government study found similar abnormal brain responses with brain cell activity increasing just 50 minutes after being exposed to cell phone radiation. The researchers discuss the fact that the effects of increase in brain activity are not known, which may lead to long-term consequences when it comes to cell phone use.

While there may be controversy over the studied effects of cell phone use, one thing is for sure: the long-term effects of cell phones are frightening at the very least. It may take a decade or more, but the heavy usage of mobile phones may ignite a wave of cancer and tumors among citizens of the world. This epidemic may be coupled with the stinging regret that the world did not heed the warnings of many experts and all the studies highlighting the dangers of cell phone use.

Sources:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...
http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Li...
http://www.naturalnews.com/028379_c...
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/02/2...
http://www.naturalnews.com/024807_h...

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032480_cell_ ... z1fEnJqGf9

[garbal]

http://www.naturalnews.com/032480_cell_phones_human_health.html


a 50% higher risk of developing a parotid tumor.

W
So

Sorry
We cannot find the page you are looking for. ??? the only link that works,/ mentions mobies is the NN one

meaningless %, what is the risk of getting one if you dont use a mobile ?

[garbal]

What has research shown about the possible cancer-causing effects of radiofrequency energy?

Although there have been some concerns that radiofrequency energy from cell phones held closely to the head may affect the brain and other tissues, to date there is no evidence from studies of cells, animals, or humans that radiofrequency energy can cause cancer.

It is generally accepted that damage to DNA is necessary for cancer to develop. However, radiofrequency energy, unlike ionizing radiation, does not cause DNA damage in cells, and it has not been found to cause cancer in animals or to enhance the cancer-causing effects of known chemical carcinogens in animals (3–5).

Researchers have carried out several types of epidemiologic studies to investigate the possibility of a relationship between cell phone use and the risk of malignant (cancerous) brain tumors, such as gliomas, as well as benign (noncancerous) tumors, such as acoustic neuromas (tumors in the cells of the nerve responsible for hearing), most meningiomas (tumors in the meninges, membranes that cover and protect the brain and spinal cord), and parotid gland tumors (tumors in the salivary glands) (6).

In one type of study, called a case-control study, cell phone use is compared between people with these types of tumors and people without them. In another type of study, called a cohort study, a large group of people is followed over time and the rate of these tumors in people who did and didn’t use cell phones is compared. Cancer incidence data can also be analyzed over time to see if the rates of cancer changed in large populations during the time that cell phone use increased dramatically. The results of these studies have generally not provided clear evidence of a relationship between cell phone use and cancer, but there have been some statistically significant findings in certain subgroups of people.

Findings from specific research studies are summarized below:

The Interphone Study, conducted by a consortium of researchers from 13 countries, is the largest health-related case-control study of use of cell phones and head and neck tumors. Most published analyses from this study have shown no statistically significant increases in brain or central nervous system cancers related to higher amounts of cell phone use. One recent analysis showed a statistically significant, albeit modest, increase in the risk of glioma among the small proportion of study participants who spent the most total time on cell phone calls. However, the researchers considered this finding inconclusive because they felt that the amount of use reported by some respondents was unlikely and because the participants who reported lower levels of use appeared to have a reduced risk of brain cancer (7–9). Another recent study from the group found no relationship between brain tumor locations and regions of the brain that were exposed to the highest level of radiofrequency energy from cell phones (10).

A cohort study in Denmark linked billing information from more than 420,000 cell phone subscribers with brain tumor incidence data from the Danish Cancer Registry. The analyses found no association between cell phone use and the incidence of glioma, meningioma, or acoustic neuroma, even among people who had been cell phone subscribers for 10 or more years (11–13).

Early case-control studies in the United States, Europe, and Japan were unable to demonstrate a relationship between cell phone use and glioma or meningioma (14).

Some case-control studies in Sweden found statistically significant trends of increasing brain cancer risk for the total amount of cell phone use and the years of use among people who began using cell phones before age 20 (15). However, another large, case-control study in Sweden did not find an increased risk of brain cancer among people between the ages of 20 and 69 (16). In addition, the international CEFALO study, which compared children who were diagnosed with brain cancer between ages 7 and 19 with similar children who were not, found no relationship between their cell phone use and risk for brain cancer (17).

NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, which tracks cancer incidence in the United States over time, found no increase in the incidence of brain or other central nervous system cancers between 1987 and 2007, despite the dramatic increase in cell phone use in this country during that time (18). Similarly, incidence data from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden for the period 1974–2003 revealed no increase in age-adjusted incidence of brain tumors (19).

Studies of workers exposed to radiofrequency energy have shown no evidence of increased risk of brain tumors among U.S. Navy electronics technicians, aviation technicians, or fire control technicians, those working in an electromagnetic pulse test program, plastic-ware workers, cellular phone manufacturing workers, or Navy personnel with a high probability of exposure to radar (6).


http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/fact ... cellphones

[Geronimo]

And the eating of the beef?

rarely, im not keen on it

Eating beef rarely cooked is almost extreme eating, do you do extreme sport, ie hand gliding by your feet?

[garbal]

And the eating of the beef?

rarely, im not keen on it

Eating beef rarely cooked is almost extreme eating, do you do extreme sport, ie hand gliding by your feet?

as in not very often, on the rare occasions i do its very well done

though when the MCD hysteria was at its height, i bought out tescos stock of rump steak and fed it to the dog, who lived to a ripe old age

[Geronimo]

"very well done" you mean your a skilled cook as well as a hand glider, BUT i bet you havent cooked a three course meal, to go, while water skying on the backs of two alligators in the everglades of deep south Devon. Knowing your prey to the locals and where even the Traffic wardens play banjos on duty.

[garbal]

"very well done" you mean your a skilled cook as well as a hand glider, BUT i bet you havent cooked a three course meal, to go, while water skying on the backs of two alligators in the everglades of deep south Devon. Knowing your prey to the locals and where even the Traffic wardens play banjos on duty.

i never cook, ever, but what has this sudden interest in my diet got to do with mobies and cancer, not trying to change the subject, are you ?

[Geronimo]

"very well done" you mean your a skilled cook as well as a hand glider, BUT i bet you havent cooked a three course meal, to go, while water skying on the backs of two alligators in the everglades of deep south Devon. Knowing your prey to the locals and where even the Traffic wardens play banjos on duty.

i never cook, ever, but what has this sudden interest in my diet got to do with mobies and cancer, not trying to change the subject, are you ?

Not really, i just digress when i get bored. The fact is time will tell if the masses are being lied to again, in the mean time, do you want to buy a phone that gets so hot you could cook an egg on it.

[garbal]

in the mean time, do you want to buy a phone that gets so hot you could cook an egg on it.

how much do you want for it ? i might start cooking again