Hi , this is only how I comprehend it with a little Acceptance(d) for(as) Value thrown in .
Acceptance for Value - 2 interested parties ( At Contract ) must agree to the value in any transaction of a security interest be that the product / labour or the specie of money i.e currency , promissory note , loan agreement , cheque or even a simple I.O.U . Which lets face it is all that our FIAT currency is ( promise to pay the bearer on demand ) or a remittance (sales bill) . As long as both parties agree to the inherent equal value of both instruments used in the transaction then we have a literal exchanging of both security interests .
Product/labour for money , to keep it simple .
NEVER accept a notice as valuable . You deal with a notice with your own notice . Send back their notice with your own acknowledging receipt of their notice but that it has no effect and that you are now discharging their notice as you do not comprehend the terms used .
This should be printed on the back " NOTICE OF DISCHARGE OF NOTICE BY SEEKING CLARIFICATION " and then go on to highlight the words you dont understand .
If you then receive a remittance/sales bill ( with the trans cash form attached ), def;- “1. A sum of money sent to another as payment for goods or services. 2. An instrument (such as a check) used for sending money. 3. The action or process of sending money to another person or place.” Black's Law Dictionary .
So by very definition from the Law Society the remittance ( trans cash form ) already has value as this is a "specie of money" which must be signed . I accept the initial value and the company sending the remittance has also accepted its value by applying a signature or company stamp of some sort . The game is over before it has even begun , but as the whole system is built on fraud then what's a little Compound Interest Fraud eh ??? This term is guaranteed to scare the crap out of them .
What the company/bank actually wants YOU to do is send back the original bill (specie of money) signed with your signature (promise to pay) along with a cheque , which is of course again signed by you . Your signature allows then to access the credit facility the government gives you via the bank .
So not only have you paid them twice , well 24 times in the E.U , using the Fractional Reserve Policy, you have been induced to commit fraud by twinning revenue .
Refuse to be an accessory .
Obligation & Liabilities : - A security interest is anything that can create an obligation to pay or perform a service . If it is not a transaction of security interest then dont talk to me . Do I have an obligation to pay or perform ? If so there must have been a transaction of a security interest . If the claimant does not recognise it as a transaction of a security interest then you are certainly not obliged to pay . .
A transaction of a security interest can always be voided/discharged within 3 days and will be rendered Void a Beniccio ( at the start ) if it is secured under duress or anything that would invalidate a contact at law i.e fraud , mistake , protest or simply , you did not wish to contract with them .
Everything in our beautiful messed up world is now operating under Contact Law . This Law is your friend you've just got to introduce yourself .
Heres some great information on European Contract Law - http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.pr ... 8/doc.html http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/eu.contract.pr ... 8/doc.html