Putting the CR and Strawman myth to Bed!

[Jackisace86]

legaleagle have you seen any of the dean clifford videos? if so then what do you make of his theories and claims for having dropped charges for simply not allowing jurisdiction?

[legaleagle]

I'm afraid Dean Clifford is on a very long to do list (a long with may others such as David Icke.) so no I haven't seen any. If he is talking about courts in this country (a lot of the people quoted are in the USA) then I can't see a court dropping anything based purely on him not allowing (recognising) their jurisdiction. I look forward to getting a chance to watch some of these videos though.

[Jackisace86]

I'm afraid Dean Clifford is on a very long to do list (a long with may others such as David Icke.) so no I haven't seen any. If he is talking about courts in this country (a lot of the people quoted are in the USA) then I can't see a court dropping anything based purely on him not allowing (recognising) their jurisdiction. I look forward to getting a chance to watch some of these videos though.

Well he is based in Canada and has made claims that as they fall under the Queens rule they are subject to the same laws or same kind of laws and that everything he is doing is directly applicable to UK law. Personally I dont see it, but would be good to get a barristers opinion on it. In fact theres a whole array of subjects in this forum where we might benefit from your opinion - even if they do see your particular trade as being part of the problem!

[ljtherock]

well as his defence council he is clearly not guilty. There is always something you can argue. Maybe the other side pressurised him into it and therefore he did not sign of his own free will. Or maybe the other side deliberately hid parts of the contract from him (as in the PPI cases.) The issue with the question is that my job as defence council is to make the situation as good for my client as possible. Even if they confess they have done what they are accused of doing.

Under normal circumstances, some woul say that Elizabeth II would be served well by one as you (not a personal slant)... BUT........ Elizabeth is above legislation and all the courts reside under her authority. She is not ever going to convict herself now, is she...

[legaleagle]

This is true although she can be tried (technically) if ever she became a catholic. Also the rest of the royal family are (to my knowledge) not so immune from prosecution. Princess Anne for instance was convicted for driving 93mph on a dual carriageway and was fined for having a dog dangerously out of control in a public place.

[Tampinu]

well as his defence council he is clearly not guilty. There is always something you can argue. Maybe the other side pressurised him into it and therefore he did not sign of his own free will. Or maybe the other side deliberately hid parts of the contract from him (as in the PPI cases.) The issue with the question is that my job as defence council is to make the situation as good for my client as possible. Even if they confess they have done what they are accused of doing.

Under normal circumstances, some woul say that Elizabeth II would be served well by one as you (not a personal slant)... BUT........ Elizabeth is above legislation and all the courts reside under her authority. She is not ever going to convict herself now, is she...

I hear what you are saying about 'Legislation' and that's why the Queen cannot be under legislation, but it must be noted that even the Queen is under the "LAW". The only thing/person that is above the law is:
The rule-of-law

Walk good

Tampinu

[phracktl]

Just putting this out here for you to weigh & follow up as you wish.
DaveH is a rewarding read and he's been looking at Hurricane Sandy.
Here's what's happening with Cede & Co.
http://tradewithdave.com/?p=13092
and
http://tradewithdave.com/?p=13204
best

[don'tvote]

A couple of years ago some people came onto Tpuc website and were posting lots of information regarding Commercial Redemption and the Strawman! I won't mention any names but at the time I was not at all impressed!
Through what I found out about these so called subjects in my opinion they were a massive con!

What did you find out,that has caused you to believe it is all "massive con"?

[nikijam88]

I'm afraid Dean Clifford is on a very long to do list (a long with may others such as David Icke.) so no I haven't seen any. If he is talking about courts in this country (a lot of the people quoted are in the USA) then I can't see a court dropping anything based purely on him not allowing (recognising) their jurisdiction. I look forward to getting a chance to watch some of these videos though.

yeah dude Clifford is really on a very long give the solution of this issue.

[kingkong60351]

very good info.. good post with good and healthy info.