A quick word about the terminology at the top of most of these documents ...
The terminology I am talking about is this:
CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND REQUIREMENT TO PERFORM
As your situation progresses you may have need to amend information in these notices and 'update' them. That is why the word CONSTRUCTIVE is used. It allows you that leeway, whereas without this one word you are locked in to what you wrote originally and when things do change you will be hard pressed to change anything that you have already done.
How many of you have seen the notices that have been posted up to be used here and elsewhere? I have seen many. Start using this form of wording at the top of your notices.
The next bit is REQUIREMENT TO PERFORM
This is placed there because these individuals are there to serve US. We do not ask nicely for them to do something, or say please, or REQUEST them to do something (which is NOT the same as a REQUIREMENT). You want them to do something. There is no ifs or buts about it. A request can be turned down. A requirement cannot be. It must be fulfilled.
How many of you have read on 'official' documents the word 'request'. I don't remember that word coming up much. I remember the word, required, being used as in 'you are required to fill out this form'. Yes, I know, you are usually not 'required' as they have no authority over you without your consent. So here is another example of their deception over you.
YOU on the other hand have every right to require them to perform what you want of them. After all they supposedly work for you don't they? (Yeah, they don't really.)
In your correspondence with these corporate shills you will have your words, letters, intentions, etc twisted. I sent a letter to the DVLA and used the word REQUIRED or REQUIRE a few times never the word request.
They sent an interesting letter back and at the end of it they said 'sorry we can't fulfill your request'. So watch out for this type of sneakiness. When they do this sort of thing you can very legitimately cancel any 'contract' you have with them or any other 'official' entity quite easily because they are telling you that they don't have a remedy for you.
Any of you heard the maxim of law that goes something like this (not verbatim):
ALL LAW MUST CONTAIN A REMEDY WITHIN IT FOR IT TO BE VALID
So when they prove to you that they have no remedy, by saying sorry we can't do what you require, then their laws/rules/statutes, etc, dealing with whatever situation you are handling is void from the beginning (ab initio).
(This is the sort of stuff I learnt from Jerry. Any of you can call him up whenever you want. You will find his phone number at the top of his page here (USA) or I can hook you in on a three - way call with no cost to me and Jerry does not charge a dime for his time:http://matrixfiles.com/JerryKirk/
When dealing with these criminals scrupulously look over the words they are using because they will give the game away by what they are writing. The only reason they have got away with it so far is that they use words in very, very specific ways without us having a clue. Once you spot this stuff you can see it a mile off.