is the G4S fiasco a pre-planned bait and switch? (vote)

[Rica]

i could be wrong but i think that it is a bait and switch, despite the 'apparent terrorist attacks' during the last 12 years leading up to the olympics, it would still be difficult in the eyes of the common people to justify military personnel doing all of the security for the games but and i admit i could be wrong but-if say a company like G4S was contracted to do most of the security and then they don't manage to recruit enough staff to cover the numbers needed to fulfill said contract...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18837524
And if the staff they do have seem unreliable and unlikely to actually turn up and perform the duties they are contracted for..
http://www.itv.com/news/2012-07-13/six- ... -weymouth/

...then perhaps that was the plan all along, it is entirely possible i think that g4s could lose the contract and would have to be replaced entirely by military personnel (and some police of course) at seemingly short notice.

then tptb can come out and say "this wasn't preplanned honest guv."

i still think something is going to happen (though i hope not) and if it does (or if it is seeming stopped by the military)-then it gives them the excuse to roll out militarization/martial law and if you don't know what it was like to live in northern ireland then i think we are about to find out, it also gives the tptb a good way to quickly deal with any protests and riots in the future etc-very very clever methinks (if true)

plus i can't help but notice that there have been a hell of a lot of adverts for the territorial army recently-perhaps that is somehow connected?

what do you think? please vote now (you can change your vote if you wish and please mods-don't move this to the conspiracy forum-it's too important!)

edit: skipper i just saw your post-sorry but i'm glad to see it isn't just me thinking this

[bodge]

They wont roll out martial law unless there is a massive attack whatever it would be but they would be then ideally placed to roll out martial law in that area if an attack occured. Its a six and two threes.

[Rica]

hi bodge, if the 'financial capital' is all they cared about i think you'd be right, but i don't think that is all they care about, it's all just theory at this point and maybe if an attack happens it might actually be a genuine attack (well maybe-can't rule that out entirely)

when 9/11 happened to begin with-i believed it all, it wasn't till much later that i started to wake up and question everything, this time i will question from the start-should anything happen (actually before the start as i already am)

[1.618]

Well before changing their name to G4s, group 4 security made massive blunders, losing prisoners amongst other things which is why they changed their name in the first place. they are an incompetent bunch of noobs!

[Rica]

Well before changing their name to G4s, group 4 security made massive blunders, losing prisoners amongst other things which is why they changed their name in the first place. they are an incompetent bunch of noobs!

that is a fair point GR but then again that does make them the perfect choice doesn't it

[Too Far Gone]

Personally, I think all this is crap!

Let's use some logic here and assume I want to go to the games...

My personal safety is far more important than the Olympics games. Looking at the amount of security, military, hardware, policing etc, tells me the organisers think this is an extremely dangerous place to be.Oh, well, in that case, I don't think I'll bother going and watch it on TV.

Does this only make sense to me?

[Freeman Stephen]

I haven't a clue what this thread is about. something to do with olympic security concerns being publically broadcast by olympic vested interests of the msm. im sure that's as much as i need to know regarding the truth an relevance of this whole thing.

[skweeker]

G4S are an Israeli corporation.

Who had security detail at World Trade on 9/11?

Are the charges/nuke already installed?

We will soon find out!

[skweeker]

http://www.whoprofits.org/company/group4securicor-g4s

[chaz63]

Apart from the car bombs
Or suicide attacks outside shops or in cafes in countries around the middle east and the odd few maniacs running amock in india etc with machine guns and the attack at a scottish airport (which i must admit was extreamly sophisticated!!!!)whereby they drove a motor at the main doors,i dont see why the goverment or anybody else is worried enough to fill london with troops(many of which are foreign) or am i missing somthing.
Of coarse theres a reason for their pressence but what that is i dont know.