HOW THE GOVERNMENT STEAL CHILDREN FROM LOVING FAMILIES

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Would you trust this man with your children , Conservative leader of Kent County Council and Corporate parent who has recently apologised for the third rate child protection services offered in Kent ?

http://save-kent.blogspot.com/search/la ... l%20Carter

Are these the eyes of a loving a parent ?

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Kent County Council the excellent delusion

Is it, just me, who is sickened by the constant claim, now plastered on Kent's KCC website, suggesting the local authority is somehow excellent.

The recent news that KCC, has left children at grave risk, underlines the danger of KCC's mind set, the notion that both Cllr Paul Carter has promoted, along with senior officers in the past, of Kent council being excellent, does nothing to deter the sort of complacency that resulted in Ofsted's damning report.

Currently KCC website, is promoting itself with this very questionable claim "A council that performs excellently" when clearly it doesn't. Obviously this is complete bollix, who exactly endorsed this assertion I wonder, no doubt, some fellow public sector dib dobs?


Cllr Paul Carter, the leader of the controlling group of KCC, ought to explain why KCC justifies suggestions of excellence when the council have made so many cock ups, I just wonder if KCC had to put its claim to trading standards, how long the excellence tag would stand up.

Here are just some examples of why, this surely cannot be true, 50 million pounds melted away in Iceland, many hundreds of thousands wasted on projects like, flights to America (hushed up), Kent TV, film finance which failed on any commercial level, poor performing schools, fat bonus payments to council officers that fail to convince the public and others of worth.

Just as an example of the continuing controversial management of KCC take a gander at this report from Paul Francis, political editor for KM group.

http://bignewsmargate.blogspot.com/

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Dad told to "get a life" by social worker

A SOCIAL worker has apologised for telling a dad to “get a frigging life” when he called to enquire about his child’s case.
The woman was working in Lambeth council’s department for children who have been taken into care.
In the course of a two-minute phone conversation, the social worker shouts, interrupts and speaks over the man.
The woman, who has more than 10 years’ experience in social work and been employed by Lambeth since 2003, tells Dexter James to “get a life” and “write a letter” if he wanted more information.

Kate Hoey, Labour MP for Vauxhall, has called for an independent examination into his treatment.
The phone call took place last month when dad-of-two Mr James called to ask after the welfare of his youngest child, who was taken into care earlier this year.
He is fighting to have his child returned to him at a court hearing this month.
Mr James, whose name we have changed to protect his kids’ anonymity, said: “I nearly passed out when she said what she did.
“I was shocked that someone would speak like that.
“She treated me like I was nothing. She was aggressive to me and abusive.
“They are supposed to tell me how my child is doing.
“It’s not fair.”

The social worker has written to Mr James and apologised for her conduct.
Her letter said: “I lost my temper with you and spoke to you in a manner that I have never spoken to you before.
“This behaviour was uncharacteristic of me as you are aware. I regret the use of the language and the tone that I spoke to you on that day for which I am truly sorry.

“I hope that this apology goes some way to address the feelings of hurt that you may have had at the time.”
Ms Hoey met the family last week. She said she was “concerned” at the attitude of the social worker.
She said: “I want to see a full independent examination of the circumstances in the way this family has been treated.”
A Lambeth spokesman said: “Lambeth expects the highest standards of conduct from our staff. This issue has been investigated and we have offered the service user a full apology.”

Email: sam.masters@slp.co.uk

http://www.southlondon-today.co.uk/News ... ad+told+to

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Deported Children of Britain

Britain is the only country in the world that has ever deported it’s children to the other side of the world and abandoned them, Australia’s Prime Minister Kevin Rudd apologized for his country’s role in this devastating instance of British colonial history. It took place after WW11 when over 150,000 British children were sent to distant colonies to take the pressure off of Britain’s over burdened social services. The program was to provide orphaned and abandoned children with a fresh start and supply the colonies with an abundance of white workers and as unwilling competition between religious faiths.

http://socyberty.com/issues/deported-ch ... f-britain/

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Lord Falconer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcOP6Qx5a3k

[childrenslegal]

It's a shame the knee jerk reaction to people complaining about the Baby P case has resulted in 4 very innocent little Australian children who have never been suspected of abuse, being taken from their family on made up allegations by a person in the United States who has never met the family. We need to be careful what we ask for. Our family is spending Christmas in 3 separate London places, with no contact (for months) for the first time in 12 years. Our children have decided not to celebrate Christmas in Foster care. They will celebrate Christmas the day they return home & on that date forever more. Sadly the child across the road, who has social workers & police visiting regularly is still at home. Baby P may have died, but 4 children are crying to live. Our eldest has said his life is over in Foster care & he no long wishes to be part of the human race. He's 12. Is the traumatic emotional harm, trauma & loss of four children, an equal justice for Baby P?

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

childrenslegal

This is happening to thousands of children and families every day, and until the general populace wake up and do something about it, it will continue.
We have to keep on doing what we can to expose this trade in human suffering, unfortunately most dont beleive it can happen to them

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Complaints about court experts.

9 December 2010

Dear Her Majesty's Courts Service,

Please could you tell me how many people have complained about
reports made by the following people and out of these complaints,
how many have been upheld. Could I also ask for statistics on the
number of family cases they have written reports for verses the
number of cases won by the local authority.

Graham Flatman psychologist, often referred to as Dr Flatman even
though he isn't a doctor. Works from a PO Box in Faversham.

Dr Paul Millard psychiatrist.
Oliver Hockley
Dr Donald Bermingham.
These three are from the Child and Family Court Assessment Service.

I would also like to ask if it is lawful for these kinds of
specialists to use pure conjecture in their reports and if the
courts are in agreements with such conjecture being used instead of
hard facts?

Is it lawful for them to put before the court out of date
information or their interpretation of out of date material, which
has not been proven as fact in a court of law?

Are they allowed to slander someone's name in court with untruths
and conjecture and if so, is the injured party allowed to raise
this in court and ask for redress in such a case?

Yours faithfully,

A Williamson

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c ... ing-133007

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Complaints about psychologists and psychiatrists.

A Williamson made this Freedom of Information request to Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust

I write further to your recent request for information about the number of
complaints about reports made by named individuals and would advise that
following investigation, I can confirm that none of the individuals listed
in your request are employed by Kent & Medway NHS & Social Care
Partnership Trust and, therefore, we are not in a position to respond to
this part of your enquiry.

You have also asked about procedures for reports to contain "conjecture"
as opposed to fact and, in this regard, I can provide you with a general
response. The Trust retains all personal information in accordance with
the Data Protection Act 1998 and recognises that Health Professionals may
be required to document professional opinions as well as factual
information when writing both formal documents and recording activity in
the health records of individuals. All Trust staff are required to comply
with record keeping standards and the recording of professional opinions
needs to done with due consideration to the duty of care to the patient.
Professional judgement will need to be exercised to ensure that the record
accurately reflects the professional opinion and clearly defines the
information as professional opinion as opposed to fact. The information
must be sufficient for its purpose and contain enough information to
enable a reader to interpret it correctly and, in some circumstances, it
may be necessary to explain the circumstances surrounding the opinion or
evidence on which it is based.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c ... ing-133369

[wouldntyouliketoknow]

Complaints about court experts.

9 December 2010

Dear Her Majesty's Courts Service,

Please could you tell me how many people have complained about
reports made by the following people and out of these complaints,
how many have been upheld. Could I also ask for statistics on the
number of family cases they have written reports for verses the
number of cases won by the local authority.

Graham Flatman psychologist, often referred to as Dr Flatman even
though he isn't a doctor. Works from a PO Box in Faversham.

Dr Paul Millard psychiatrist.
Oliver Hockley
Dr Donald Bermingham.
These three are from the Child and Family Court Assessment Service.

I would also like to ask if it is lawful for these kinds of
specialists to use pure conjecture in their reports and if the
courts are in agreements with such conjecture being used instead of
hard facts?

Is it lawful for them to put before the court out of date
information or their interpretation of out of date material, which
has not been proven as fact in a court of law?

Are they allowed to slander someone's name in court with untruths
and conjecture and if so, is the injured party allowed to raise
this in court and ask for redress in such a case?

Yours faithfully,

A Williamson

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/c ... ing-133007

Melizza Moore left an annotation (14 December 2010)

Yes, an EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST not a clinical one called Andrew Kawalek from Carter Brown Associates in Mansfield made out he wrote the reports for the Jersey care home scandal thing. He said to me that "nothing untoward happened there". ( Not what I heard from the mouths of the survivors in August) .Made out he had wrote them. But it wasn't. They were written by Dr Kathy Bull. His C.V that is online, differs to the one that were in court documents. He claims he was assessing us both, but my husband didn't agree to the testing. Made out that I have a personality disorder. When it has NEVER been diagnosed by anybody , least of all no PSYCHIATRIST. An ed psych is not qualified in that way.

There is no point going to the HPC as I tried too, with the evidence supplied that showed FRAUD of the part of CAFCASS , my children's solicitor ( social services minions) but they sided with him as no collegue defecates on another as they all are in the same pot. Carter Brown associates are used A LOT in care proceedings. They are one of the favourite companies.