This is proof that" NoContract" works

Have you been stopped and searched for any reason? Tell us here.
Forum rules
The articles and opinions written on this website , might not reflect the views of the site, We do not give legal advice and in no way are we responsible for what is written by our members

This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby Gazza1222 » Tue Dec 21, 2010 12:57 pm

In July of this year I was arrested as part of an operation by the Serious Organised Crime Agency ( SOCA ) for drugs charges that I was entirely innocent of. I just happened to be mixing in certain circles at that time and had been linked by association. When I was taken to the copshop I refused to give any details about myself and also refused to acknowledge anything that was said or demanded of me and was placed in cells for several hours. Later that day two detectives opened the door and said they wanted to interview me. My response was " If you monkeys want to spend your time chasing your tails because someone who has a grudge against me picked the phone up well that's fine by me but dont expect me to play your games. I'm not leaving this cell." They replied that my solicitor was there to speak with me in the interview room and I told them to bring him to the cell. Five mins later he's in my cell and asking me to go to the interview room. I reluctantly obliged. On turning the tapes on the coppers asked for my name and date of birth, of which I refused ( still no contract ). I answered the few questions they asked methen the interview was concluded. At that point the desk sergeant asked for a word with my brief outside, and a few mins later my brief came back and said they were going to bail me. I said they werent and he seemed a little confused by my response, so I explained to him that because I hadnt commited any statutory offence and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise then they being a private corporation were breaching my common law rights by unlawfully detaining me. I refused to accept bail and simply told him that they will release me regardless. My brief asked me to go through the motions at the desk while the sergeant read the bail sheet out at which point I signalled him to stop and place me back in the cell, which he did. About half an hour later the desk sergeant's back with the inspector who, on the pretext of an eight hour review (I'd been in about five hours) told me they were bailing me out. Again I told them that I hadn't contracted with them at any time and I would be leaving the station as I had came in. At hearing this the inspector said "Look, neither my desk sergeant or me want you in our station, so the sergeant will read your bail sheet in front of the cctv camera in the custody suite and that will satisfy us" When I was ready to leave the sergeant dutifully read out the bail sheet to which I didn't acknowledge. Not at any time from my arrest to release did I acknowledge them or give my details which would have established a joinder or contract. My bail date has long past and of all the people arrested that day one was found in possession of a small amount of cannibis (personal) and they took her to court to justify wasting taxpayers money on a massive police operation. This works, just learn to apply it.
Gazza1222
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:28 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby kazz67 » Tue Dec 21, 2010 1:34 pm

Thanks Gazza.

You use exactly the method I would use if I were ever arrested. No contract! - If they have no name or other personal details, they have nothing upon which to act. Simples!
To this end it's always a good idea to leave any potential source of ID at home unless you need to have it with you (i.e. bank card). But even if they find something on you which contains personal info (i.e. Identifies the legal person) you still have the right not to contract. You are NOT that piece of plastic and you are NOT that written name. There may be an utterance by which you are commonly called, and there may bell be a written representation of that utterance, but you are NOT that. Remember this and don;t be tricked into agreeing to represent the legal person!!

Love n hugs,
Kazz. xxxx
We trade natural freedoms for access to the protection of the law. When that access is denied, then the contract is broken and all bets are off. There is no obligation for one side to fulfil their part when the other refuses to. - Slimline66
User avatar
kazz67
 
Posts: 5700
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:27 am
Location: Liverpool
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby huemale » Tue Dec 21, 2010 1:44 pm

Hi ppl
Does No contract work at crown court stage? I will do a general on this either way as the information is excellent

Thanks for the posr great stuff

Huemale
Practise being a Hueman.
Human Being told.
Our Planet Our time Their future
Governance Over Destiny the essence of the word GOD..

May we all unite as one and collectively strive for our natural birth right of universal freedom.
huemale
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:48 am
Location: Dartford
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby Scouser » Tue Dec 21, 2010 2:11 pm

That's more like it.

Stay on the ball at all times, accept nothing from them.

I wouldn't have accepted the interview myself. :mrgreen:
Scouser
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby occula7 » Tue Dec 21, 2010 2:47 pm

this is an interesting post. like the way you handled yourself. But was it a real 'method' in every sense of the word. I would have thought that anyone who had not done anything wrong would do as the OP has done, weather they understood or even heard about a 'method' of no contract. You hear people doing it all the time with the phrase No Comment.
occula7
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:05 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby startfresh » Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:06 pm

pace act 1984 is worth a good read by any 1 who views this post yuo do not have to give youre name unless you are being reported for an offence freshy
User avatar
startfresh
 
Posts: 5146
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 4:28 pm
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby Gazza1222 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:42 pm

Just to go over what I reported in my first post; I have to be frank with you all and tell you I've had extensive dealings with the coppers in my past although I've kept my nose clean for almost a decade so I guess I've got quite a bit background experience. The law dont particularly like me and there's no love lost but at the same time we have to remember that most if not all the lower ranks are operating in ignorance, a "need to know" basis. Remember that as long as you dont violate statutory law, or at least they may have no evidence that you have, then you can be fairly confident that they can do little to you as long as you dont allow yourself to be trapped into anything. One of you stated that you would not have went into the interview room, that's fine. In my case I know that I can handle myself. All you have to remember is "no name, No d.o.b., "for the benefit of the tape". I get around this in several ways; I can simply say "I dont wish to give you that info" in which case they may terminate interview. So what? They can do that as much as they want, they'll get the same response every time. The other option is to get your brief to surrender the info you refuse to give yourself, which is what my brief did. It's not YOU that's giving it. You can actually have some fun with this if you dont mind a few hours in the cells or even an overnight stay. When the inspector came to my cell he asked me if I didn't have anything else better to do and I told him no I had all the time in the world. The law have had many countless opportunities to arrest me for an outstanding warrant if they reckon I've failed to surrender, I dont believe that to be the case though. I might add that this is not the first time I've pulled this off, but with the courts it's a little more tricky. I've represented myself in the civil courts, specifically family courts as a kind of a tester, but I got railroaded because I wasn't up on civil procedures and the opposing counsel and the judge took the piss. Nevertheless, I know that with a little more knowledge I might get a better result next time. With the courts I think you have to look on the merits of the case. If you go the common law way you'd better be clued up. The judge commented in his summing up that "Gary seems to think that statutory law does not apply to him, but it's the law of the land". We all know he's talking bollocks cos' it's law of the sea but you have to wonder whether HE actually knows that or is he as ignorant as the coppers. Remember what JH says, it's just all theatre and these are goofs in costumes. You may have to take the rough with the smooth but stand your ground and THINK Common Law, BE Common Law....and try and have fun while you're at it, eventually it will become second nature.
Best of Luck to you all
Gazza1222
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:28 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby Gazza1222 » Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:55 pm

Just to answer occula7, maybe I was wrong in describing it as method. I've used the old tried and tested "no comment" many times in the past but if it ever goes to court you make life difficult for yourself. That's not to say you cant use it when needs be but sometimes I like to lecture my interrogating officers on the Globalist Agenda or the difference between Common Law and Statutory law,........ ;) for the benefit of the tape.
Gazza1222
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:28 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby robespierre » Thu Dec 23, 2010 1:33 pm

Gazza1222 wrote:In July of this year I was arrested as part of an operation by the Serious Organised Crime Agency ( SOCA ) for drugs charges that I was entirely innocent of. I just happened to be mixing in certain circles at that time and had been linked by association. When I was taken to the copshop I refused to give any details about myself and also refused to acknowledge anything that was said or demanded of me and was placed in cells for several hours. Later that day two detectives opened the door and said they wanted to interview me. My response was " If you monkeys want to spend your time chasing your tails because someone who has a grudge against me picked the phone up well that's fine by me but dont expect me to play your games. I'm not leaving this cell." They replied that my solicitor was there to speak with me in the interview room and I told them to bring him to the cell. Five mins later he's in my cell and asking me to go to the interview room. I reluctantly obliged. On turning the tapes on the coppers asked for my name and date of birth, of which I refused ( still no contract ). I answered the few questions they asked methen the interview was concluded. At that point the desk sergeant asked for a word with my brief outside, and a few mins later my brief came back and said they were going to bail me. I said they werent and he seemed a little confused by my response, so I explained to him that because I hadnt commited any statutory offence and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise then they being a private corporation were breaching my common law rights by unlawfully detaining me. I refused to accept bail and simply told him that they will release me regardless. My brief asked me to go through the motions at the desk while the sergeant read the bail sheet out at which point I signalled him to stop and place me back in the cell, which he did. About half an hour later the desk sergeant's back with the inspector who, on the pretext of an eight hour review (I'd been in about five hours) told me they were bailing me out. Again I told them that I hadn't contracted with them at any time and I would be leaving the station as I had came in. At hearing this the inspector said "Look, neither my desk sergeant or me want you in our station, so the sergeant will read your bail sheet in front of the cctv camera in the custody suite and that will satisfy us" When I was ready to leave the sergeant dutifully read out the bail sheet to which I didn't acknowledge. Not at any time from my arrest to release did I acknowledge them or give my details which would have established a joinder or contract. My bail date has long past and of all the people arrested that day one was found in possession of a small amount of cannibis (personal) and they took her to court to justify wasting taxpayers money on a massive police operation. This works, just learn to apply it.



sweet... nicely done.
robespierre
 
Posts: 1459
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:21 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: This is proof that" NoContract" works

Postby not2sure » Thu Dec 23, 2010 5:38 pm

this is not proof that "no contract works in the john harris sense at all", what you have shown is perfect common sense.

yes there are people who don't know how to handle themselves in these kind of situations but I have to agree with another poster here "it is what anyone would do" with a bit of common sense.
and well done by the way.
not2sure
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 5:49 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Next

Return to Members Stories

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests