CPS say 'OK' for dealers to sell drugs to kids!

[Scouser]

To cut a long story short, some junkie offered to sell my daughter (she's 13), some amphetamines a few weeks ago, shortly after the incident I caught him with the drugs on him and detained him until the police arrived, he was charged with 'offering to supply a controlled drug'.

Got a letter today:

The Crown Prosecution Service have decided that the prosecution is not needed in the public interest, therefore they have decided to drop the case.

So there you have it, proof the run for profit corp. known as the CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/ePlatform ... country=GB) don't care if drug dealers are out selling drugs to our children!

[RobbieHall]

From the "freeman" side of things, what he did was absolutely fine. He didn't harm anyone, or cause anyone any lose, or use any mischief in his contracts.

[BIGBADMAN]

absolutely robbie,id rather my daughter took some crap speed over the likes of cider/vodka/wine,if she was so inclined.Just say no to alcohol

[Scouser]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphetamine#Effects

I'd say at least some of those would be considered causing harm & loss under common law, especially to a 10 year old child.

I'm confident a jury would convict.

[MorningStar]

The CPS did not say what you have named this post, that was misleading. Not impressed. They have limited resources, and often do not have the time or money to persue petty drug charges. And I agree with the afore mentioned standpoint, no-one was forced to take any drugs, no harm done. So called 'illegal' drugs are only so because large pharmacutical companies want to sell very similar products for a profit. I would also like to say that 'arresting' someone normally involves assault on some level, which is a crime in common law. If an individual has caused no harm, and no loss then there is no justification to assault that individual.

[RobbieHall]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphetamine#Effects

I'd say at least some of those would be considered causing harm & loss under common law, especially to a 10 year old child.

I'm confident a jury would convict.

But he didn't cause those effects. Your daughter would have been free to take or to not take the drugs, the simple act of him selling them would not have done any damamge at all.

The drug control laws are in exactly the same vane as the speeding/parking laws, they are there to stop any POTENTIAL negative effects, which is the kind of nannying that this freeman stuff is looking to rid the world of is it not?

[MorningStar]

The drug control laws are in exactly the same vane as the speeding/parking laws, they are there to stop any POTENTIAL negative effects, which is the kind of nannying that this freeman stuff is looking to rid the world of is it not?[/quote]


That's exactly what The Freeman strategy is aimed at, as far as my understanding goes. Ridding ourselves of this future/thought/expression/risk policing.
Well said that man. We should be free to put anything into our bodies that we choose, lethal or not.

[slimline66]

Are you twats serious???

How old are you .. 15? ...16? ... 17 and a half????

This is new to me ... is this what FREEMEN promote????

Every one of us have an obligation to protect our children from certain dangers until they become mature enough to make their own way in life... and to a point, protect others children too.

Scouser, you should have taken him down an ally and force fed him his "wares" ...

[kazz67]

Every one of us have an obligation to protect our children from certain dangers until they become mature enough to make their own way in life... and to a point, protect others children too.

Scouser, you should have taken him down an ally and force fed him his "wares" ...

Agreed! (Though I'm questioning myself about the second part, I know exactly what I'd do if some lowlife dealer tried this with one of my nieces!)

I wonder if anyone can guess the potential harm that comes to young girls who get involved with drugs and drug-dealers? - There's a reason this lowlife targeted a 13 year old girl, and it wasn't to show her a good time.
The attitude of the CPS suggesting that a prosecution is 'not in the public interest' - which indeed can be interpreted as them saying it's OK to sell drugs to kids AND it's 0k to target your girls - tells us in no uncertain terms where we rank in their scheme and what their priorities are.

Peace n Love,
Kazz.

[BIGBADMAN]

Ho ho ho,em,certain dangers ?get a grip on your self .dont think ive ever heard of anyone dying or whatever thru a 5- 10 bag of speed. make you dance and sweat all night but not much else,and its not addictive,great stuff ,alcohol on the other hand,13 year old girl drinking a 3£ bottle of cider,shes in real danger.