£81,000 that the court is trying to stop me from claiming

[Tampinu]

Greetings

I was unlawfully, wrongfully and unfairly dismissed by my ex-employer in May 2011 and I took the claims to the Tribunal but following the corrupt and devious practices of the respondents i withdrew the claims from tribunal and began a court Action for £81000 damages at the High Court.
All seemed fine and my case was processed until a few months later when I received a letter from the court titled "Court order/Judgment". This 'Judgment' declared that the court had no jurisdiction to try the claims, then it added that "the claim form would be set aside", then it concluded that "claimant to pay the cost of respondents making this application". (This court order was NOT signed by a judge or any court official).

I wrote back to prove that the court had jurisdiction to try the claims and my two letters were ignored (apparently as I was seen as a strawman). This caused me to write a 3rd letter, sent by recorded delivery and warning that i would report the matter to the County's High Sheriff and the County's Lord Lieutenant if the court continued to deny jurisdiction where it is clearly established that there is jurisdiction. To this letter I received a response from the courts (at last! I didn't know Judges wrote to mere men like us ) the judge advised that "claimant cannot conduct proceedings by correspondence and that I should use an 'application/Appeal'.

Now, considering that the original court order stated that there was no jurisdiction, why should a judge be asking me to make an 'appeal' to a court that has no Jurisdiction according to the court's own order , secondly, I only understand an appeal to be relevant in circumstances where the merits and the substance of the claims have been heard and the judgment has been given based on that, in my case there has been no hearing, no jurisdiction and no judgment (an unsigned judgment is NOT a judgment, it is a void judgment/order). So I wrote to the judge to advise that the order he referred me to was in fact a void order as it was an order/judgment that was made by a court that has no jurisdiction to try the claim to which the judgment/order relates! (This must have annoyed them so much as they don't like mere humans to see through their tricks etc ). The judge wrote back that "Claimant cannot conduct proceedings by correspondence, an application may be used". My point is, they are trying to bring me under their jurisdiction by asking me to appeal and use an application, yet i want to remain in my 'common law' jurisdiction and claim every common law right. Plus an application cost £80 a go, where do they expect a man that has brought a case to court due to dismissal to find £80 for every statements he wants to make to the court?

The interesting thing is that I was searching about how to make an appeal/application in court and it stated that one has to apply for permission from a Judge before one can make an appeal , duh! What's more? It states that if a Judge declines to grant permission to appeal, that was the end of the matter, No appeal against such decisions!!! . So Mr Judge is setting a big trap for me called the "Appeal trap" so that I would appeal and then there would be no further arguement once the Judge says "Your appeal is refused" and that would be the tail end of the £81,000 claim (Thank God I did not fall for it as the first person I turned to in order to borrow £80 was a freeman on both the land and even the sea! ) he blatantly discouraged me from appealing stating that it would be my greatest mistake as there was no hearing of the claim and there was no valid judgment. Anyways, as I was learning more about appeals, it further revealed that if one is not happy with a Judge's decision, one can apply for a Judicial review, however, it made it clear that in order to have a judicial review one of the documents necessary would be "the transcripts of the judgment/order being appealed against, if that is not available, then a written form of the judgment/order that is endorsed with the Judge's signature the original copy is needed as a photocopy will not suffice". . What this means is that, as I have a judgment that is unsigned by a judge, I cannot even seek judicial review because I would have failed at the first hurdle which requires any judgment one intends to seek judicial review against, to be endorsed with a Judge's signature!

What did I do next? I wrote to the Judge to explain that the Judgment/order that I was given was not signed and just yesterday (about 4-5 weeks after I sent the letter) I got another letter from the Judge stating that:
It says:

"Dear Sir,
Thank u for ur letter dated 4/5/2012.
The District Judge has had sight of the matter and says it is not for the court to enter into correspond on this point. Other than that it is for the parties to make any applications that is thought fit.
It would be in your interest to seek legal advice in this matter."

Little do they know that not only have I sought legal advice, I have also obtained LAWFUL advice.
So a court Judge is stating (according to the letter) that he will not enter into correspondence with me regarding my request that I obtain a "Suitable form of Judgment/Order", isn't that a tacit agreement on the part of the Judge that the order/judgment in question is null & void?
When I got the letter, I held my ribs and laughed my head off I stopped, and then I held me ribs again and just couldn't stop laughing I said "babylon", is that all you can do?

Now I am not in a hurry to see this case through as I have VERY SOLID evidence to back up my claims hence the reason why the respondents are trying every trick in the book to throw the case out, the only way that I can lose this case is if it is NOT heard or tried at all and they know that!

I plan to write to the court again and insist on obtain a statement from the Judge himself (I suspect corrupt back office staff are the ones writting to me all the while and posing as the Judge the statements always never signed by the Judge but always signed by "Barbara S******M-BACK OFFICE SECTION) i will write and ask that I want a statement from the main judge and not from a back office staff and I will add that if I do not get it, i will report the matter to the Administrative court, local press, High Sheriff, Lord Lieutenant and the Queen's Bench-Though I didn't know the Queen had a bench that could adjudicate this matter )

Please share some ideas on this matter as it is driving me crazy and yet I will not bow, I have prepared my Nouicor but I do want to sign and serve it just yet (as I have a case in the Statutes jurisdiction and I am not a British citizen though my wife is EEA National. Please advise on how I can move this forward as i am determined to reclaim the whole £81,000 from the diabolical employers and with the aid of the same corrupt system (court) which was set up to exploit the masses
All thoughts are welcome, even blatant criticism, we are all here to learn and share so please help a brother with a word or two, or am I asking for too much by trying to claim what is rightfully mine?

Peace & Love

Tampinu

Tampinu

[hurn]

lost it after 3rd paragraph(stopped reading cant do big words and chapters)) m8 sry its not a forum you need m8 its a barister .they are greedy fuckers aswell theyl lhelp ya get ya 81 gz m8 you might have to sacrifice some of ya other credits first though as they all usually drink expencive wine and eat lavish food

[Tampinu]

lost it after 3rd paragraph(stopped reading cant do big words and chapters)) m8 sry its not a forum you need m8 its a barister .they are greedy fuckers aswell theyl lhelp ya get ya 81 gz m8 you might have to sacrifice some of ya other credits first though as they all usually drink expencive wine and eat lavish food

that is exactly what the purpose of the solicitors is! They are there to cause confusion and disruptions such that a common reasonable man will not be able to make head or tail of the claim and we are still only dealing with the "Intro" What then when we start to write about the substance and merits of the claims? Oh! That shows you that these solicitors know what they are doing by way of confusion!

Show me something? Have you ever seen a solicitor that pleads "Guilty" for his clients in court? Ok, if you do how many of them do you know? My point is made. They are there to confuse and obstruct, thats how their wages are earned Pardon me if it seems the story is long, but without a long story how can the truth be revealed? I don't like short stories like "Obama is a terrorist and he was shot in the head in a house in Pakistan" etc
One needs the whole full story in order to get to the bottom of the case. I hear what you saying about Barrister though but I can barely find a solicitor (at the time when i thought I needed one) to handle the case on a No-win-no-fee basis, let alone a Barrister! How much do you reckon I'd be charged? Hold on, before you reply, let me check my e-mail and see if I have any replies from the jobs I recently applied for on-line.

Peace & Love

Tampinu

[madlookin]

i think your right on the ball with this....fairplay....all i can add is....keep pushing....somehow,i get the feeling you will.
all the best...and pls keep us updated
regards
madlookin

[Tampinu]

i think your right on the ball with this....fairplay....all i can add is....keep pushing....somehow,i get the feeling you will.
all the best...and pls keep us updated
regards
madlookin

Thanks for the support.

I was hooked on the Freeman vibe since my freeman friend refused to loan me £80 to make an Application to the court to 'tell the court that it had made a mistake' by not giving me a suitable Judgement...lol
See what the statutes say in "CPR-Practise direction 52-Appeal" about court order needing to be signed etc

Suitable record of the judgment
5.12

Where the judgment to be appealed has been officially recorded by the court, an approved transcript of that record should accompany the appellant’s notice. Photocopies will not be accepted for this purpose. However, where there is no officially recorded judgment, the following documents will be acceptable:

Written judgments

(1) Where the judgment was made in writing a copy of that judgment endorsed with the judge’s signature.

Note of judgment

(2) When judgment was not officially recorded or made in writing a note of the judgment (agreed between the appellant’s and respondent’s advocates) should be submitted for approval to the judge whose decision is being appealed. If the parties cannot agree on a single note of the judgment, both versions should be provided to that judge with an explanatory letter. For the purpose of an application for permission to appeal the note need not be approved by the respondent or the lower court judge.


Tampi

[Freeman Stephen]

if you voluntariky make yourself a ward of court your not free and you cant claim duress either. court services are provided to you cheaply but theres a hidden cost that cant be measured in money.

[Tampinu]

if you voluntariky make yourself a ward of court your not free and you cant claim duress either. court services are provided to you cheaply but theres a hidden cost that cant be measured in money.

You're dead right on that, but this is just plain corruption

T