Some of you may remember the video on the front page recently of an Irish Freeman in Court. Well what follows is the entire story from arrest to victory.
[Originally posted on http://www.tirnasaor.com]
Hey everyone,
I know people have been wondering what was going on with this and i've been keeping quiet until I found out what would happen today. So what follows is the full story from start to finish
As many of you know I was arrested for sitting on the grass in Saint Stephens Green in Dublin on the 11th of October. Click http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqkFdqQquXM to see the video footage of what happened.
I know the following is somewhere else on the site but just for the sake of reference here is the statement of events from the 11th of September which was served to the Garda Ombudsman and the Court Records prior to my first Court [Appearance] Participation. (This is why you can hear the Judge saying in the video "over the lunch I had a chance to read your letter etc.."). I also handed a copy of this document to the arresting Garda in Court and witnessed him reading it in the Court.
Know This:
Statement of events from 1 of October 2009
By Kevin-John: F:-
I who am known as Kevin-John of the F Family, being a peaceful man of lawful
age, with sound mind, flesh and blood body with God given soul, do declare the following to
be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and ability, so help me God, as God as my
witness. Take note that I am writing in the common understanding of the English language.
On the 11th of October 2009 at approximately 15:50pm on a sunny afternoon I was
sitting peacefully with some friends on the grass in Saint Stephens Green in Dublin. An Officer
of Public works approached us and told us to move from where we were sitting. When we
asked "why?" he mentioned something about a 'bye-law and walked away. Moments
afterwards four security guard's approached us, and using aggressive tones and raised voices
began telling us to move. My friend calmly tried to engage in dialogue with the Officers of
Public Works and asked questions to clarify the situation. These ‘public servants' then
proceeded to imitate and mock us. The biggest of the four men then verbally threatened my
friend named Keith. At which point my friend named Rowan decided to place a call to the
Gardai to notify them of such behaviour. He called 999 at 15:57 to report this.
It is my understanding that a Bye-law is defined as a rule of a corporation and
corporations are fictional, legal entities that require contracts in order to obtain authority over
other parties.
When the Garda Siochana arrived Rowan began explaining the situation to one Garda
who listened calmly to what he was saying. At which point a second Garda, John Michael
Donnelly appeared, stood over me in an intimidating, overbearing way and from the offset
had a raised tone in his voice and began shouting at me. While he was shouting I would quietly
wait until he had finished and I would attempt to respond to him. He just began shouting over
me again and would not listen. I must point out here that there were several people recording
this on their cameras and I have audio visual evidence to back up what I am saying plus several
witnesses who would be willing to testify to this. These videos are now circulating on line and I
have provided you with a disk of these videos as evidence.
Two further officers arrived at the scene and along with Garda JD, it is apparent to me that that they abused their authority and breached the peace through their own actions. Physical force and aggression was used against me, unprovoked and unjustifiably! Several times I calmly asked Garda JD to "please don't touch me, remove your hand" [this can be heard in the video evidence]. However he continued to hold me.
It is my understanding that I have the power, and the freedom to refuse intercourse or
interaction with a member of an Garda Siochana who has not witnessed me breaching the
Peace.
Garda JD acknowledged he had an Oath of Office when asked. I accepted his Oath of Office. I said clearly, specifically and 'several times that Garda JD was breaching his Oath of Office [it is my belief that he had vacated his office and relinquished his Powers through his own actions], was acting unlawfully and if he continues that I can arrest him. He responded saying "no you can't" and proceeded to arrest me. Garda JD proceeded to arrest me with the knowledge that he was breaching his Oath of Office! It is apparent to me that, Garda JD abused his position and authority and committed an unlawful arrest. The Female Garda approached the vicinity and said "just arrest him". She grabbed my arm and used physical force to put it behind my back. This, I felt to be a crime.
Garda JD did not inform me of any charges or discuss my Rights before doing so. I felt, although it will be apparent in the video that a Female Garda also used what seemed to me to be excessive force against in order to secure my arrest. I was happy I had committed no crime. Approximately six Garda Siochana - which translates as Guardians of the Peace were, called to deal with this situation, and it was the officers in question that breached the peace and not I or my friends! I believe this is backed up by the audio visual evidence.
I was placed into the squad car and Garda JD sat beside me in the back. I turned and said to him, directly: "All men are born equal and equality before the Law is Paramount, you and me are equals here". He did not seem to like that comment and the Garda told me to (Shut up!' The arresting Female Garda and another Garda (driving) got into the front and we started travelling. I began to quote the Garda Oath to the best of my knowledge and recollection, in order to inform them of their actions which appeared to me to be unlawful. At which point the Gardai in the front began yelling at me to "Shut up!" The male Garda driving than said: "Shut up you scumbag ... scumbag shut up! Get a haircut goofy!"-I felt this was unacceptable behaviour by a member of an Garda Siochana, who has sworn an Oath to act with fairness, integrity, impartiality and regards for human rights etc! I do not think I should be treated in this manner. After that every comment I made - The two Gardai in the front - [Garda JDhad gone quiet at this point] responded with
derogatory insults, imitated me and mocked me.
In a Garda station, at the time I did not know which, when asked for my name and an address I asked the Female Garda in the hatch "has a crime been committed?", she responded saying "you're not going to give me your details are you?". I said clearly "for and on the record I am here under duress", at which point the arresting Female Garda started to laugh loudly saying "what prisoner isn't here under duress?" I feel this officer accepted my duress. I stated No crime has been committed and it was best if I reserved my Right to remain silent. The male Garda who had been driving then approached me in an aggressive tone and told me firmly to empty my pockets. I was scared of him, but said "If you want my pockets emptied you can do it". He snapped at me to take of my belt, he opened it and began to force it off me by pulling it. I stated "for and on the record I do not consent to any searches" when the Garda proceeded I stated "this is an unlawful search" he responded saying "yeah it is". I believe he conducted an unlawful search without my consent. When, I was read the Miranda Rights by the Female Garda on the desk I stated ifl do not understand, I do not stand-under anything you have said". I was then forced to go to a smelly prison cell by the same male Garda that
searched me.
After approximately thirty minutes a senior Garda whom I believe was the highest ranking officer in the station at that time, opened the hatch on the door and began shouting, using abusive words and aggressive language in an attempt to coerce me into disclosing an address. I was unable to clearly hear what he was saying as he was speaking quickly and too loudly, I approached the hatch to speak with the Garda to try to settle the matter. I asked him "what will happen if I do not give you my details?" At this point the senior Garda threatened me with further incarceration, a court appearance in the morning and mentioned Clover Hill Prison. This scared me. I said to this Senior Garda that I am trying to speak to you respectfully, as he continued to shout at me. I asked what crime had been committed? He referred to an Act and called me a 'Person', I corrected him saying I am a Free Man - he said "you're stupid!" and slammed the hatch loudly.
After thirty more minutes, approximately, another Garda entered the Cell. This Garda was the only member who spoke to me in a respectful tone. He addressed me as "Mr. F". I said to him I am not a 'Mr' and he may call me 'Kevin'. He asked me to explain what had happened and I proceeded to go over the details, as outlined above, beginning with the Officers of Public Works in Saint Stephens Green and I re-iterated to this Garda that a call will be logged with the Gardai by my friend and that I felt his colleagues, particularly Garda JD abused their authority, breached the peace, breached their Oath of Office and failed to uphold Bunreacht na hEireann. This Garda then advised me that they could not release me unless I gave them an address -I was given No choice in this matter and was coerced into disclosing my address for fear of further imprisonment. This Garda then left the cell where I waited for a further hour, approximately.
A Female Garda then came and opened my cell. I walked to the hatch with her, whereupon Garda EO proceeded to go through some charges which she claimed were now being brought against me. She claimed there were three in total and she asked me for a comment after each.
<i>Charge 1
Having been found in (a) public place by a member of the Garda Siochana, namely John
Donnelly Garda, who suspected with reasonable cause, that you - had been acting in a manner
contrary to the provisions of section 6 of the criminal justice (public order) Act 1994 and having
been directed by the said member of the Garda Siochana to leave a immediately the vicinity of
the place concerned in a peaceable and orderly manner did without lawful authority or
reasonable excuse failed to comply with the direction given by the said member of the Garda
Siochana.
Contrary to section 8 of the Criminal Justice Act 1994
After Garda EO spoke, I said "l have Lawful excuse".
Charqe2
... did use or engage in threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent
to provoke a breach of the Peace or being wreck less as to whether a breach of the Peace
might have been occasioned.
Contrary to section 6 of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994
After Garda EO spoke, I said "does Garda John Donnelly realise that the
events were recorded and that that is a lie?" Garda EO replied "l can't discuss
that".
Charqe3
... did, following a demand made by Garda John Donnellv, a member of An Garda
Siochana exercising his powers under section 24(2) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act
1994 failed to provide the said member with your name and address.
Contrary to section 24(3) and (4) of the Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act 1994</i>
After Garda EO spoke, I asked if she was aware of Article 41.1.1 of
Bunreacht Na hEireann which states I have "invincible and inalienable rights which are more
ancient and higher than any human statute"? Garda EO made no comment to
this.
The way I see it, all Acts are Statutes restricted in scope and applicability by Bunreacht
na hEireann and said scope and applicability is limited to members and agents of the
Government and any and any/all organs of the state.
I know that existing peacefully within my Community standards does not breach the
Peace.
Art 41.1.1 Bunreacht Na hEireann (Direct translation from Irish Text)
The state acknowledges that the Family is the basic primary sub-group of/for society
according to nature. And that it is a moral institution which has inalienable and
invincible rights which are more ancient and higher than any human statute.
I did not see Garda EO take note of any of these comments.
I stated clearly once again that "This is an unlawful arrest, I have done nothing wrong, I
was sitting on the grass, I have not committed any crime, and You know I should not be here."
When asked to sign a piece of paper I asked once again "What happens if I don't sign this?"
Garda EO snapped at me to "Just sign it!" or I would be "thrown back into the
cell", I signed out of fear. I attempted to sign this 'Under Duress'. Garda EO then
put her pen flat down on the page making it difficult for me to sign, but I still did. I informed
her she is preventing me from signing my signature and she repeated "sign it or you're going
in the cell". I wrote 'Under Duress' on the line and signed through it.
After I had signed this and was released from custody, I said to Garda EO
that "l would now like to report a crime" - Garda EO said "No, you're not
reporting a crime" (!), and refused to take my complaint. It is my understanding that members
of an Garda Siochana are obligated to accept and record any criminal complaint. I then asked
for the badge numbers of all the Peace Keepers who were on duty and involved in the case.
Garda EO refused me these details! It is also my understanding that a member
of ari Garda Siochana is obliged, if when asked, to disclose it.
I was upset at the time because of my treatment and because I had been called a
scumbag earlier I asked her if I was "like the average scumbag they drag in off the street?" she
replied saying "No you're worse" and turned away from me. The Senior Peace Keeper whom I
mentioned earlier then proceeded to tell me to "get out" and that I was "wasting their time" I
told him 11Ididn't want to come here, you brought me here, you are wasting my time". He told
me "you need the Geneva Convention" (7). I advised "Bunreacht na hEireann was good
enough for me" and left the station.
The following morning (12 of October 2009) at 11:42AM I rang Harcourt Street Garda
Station to try to clarify the badge numbers of the Garda Siochana who were on duty at the
time, if they are obliged to disclose their badge numbers, and take the report of a crime? With
the Guards permission, I recorded this conversation. The Garda Siochana I was talking too
repetitiously said "l don't know about the case" instead of answering the questions posed and
as such could not give me the badge numbers requested. She also told me that she "did not
know" if the Gardai are obliged to give badge numbers when requested and she "did not
know" if they have to take every report of crime from a member of the public seriously.
I hereby make formal complaint regarding the actions of all Officers involved with, what I
believe to be my unlawful arrest on the following grounds:
1.Garda JD and two of his colleagues breached the Peace in a public
place by using force against me and my friends.
2.Garda JD was informed and so knowingly acted against and in fact
breached his Oath of Office and by his actions vacated his office.
3.Garda JD and his colleagues abused their authority and
accompanied Garda JD in the performance of an Unlawful arrest.
4.Failed to inform me of a valid lawful reason for my arrest.
5.I was verbally accosted, ridiculed and insulted by at least three different members of an
Garda Siochana.
6.I was coerced and threatened into signing a piece of paper and was interfered with
when signing this 'under duress' by Garda EO.
7.Garda EO refused to tell me the badge numbers of the Peace Keepers
involved in the case.
8.Garda EO refused to accept my report of a crime.
I feel the Gardai Siochana in question are guilty of serious offences and they must be held
accountable for their actions, as equality before the law is paramount.
This complaint is by no means exhausted, and is subject to update and amendment
In truth and honour,
By: _
All Rights Reserved
Kevin-John: F
Verified/Witnessed
By: _
All Rights Reserved
Verified/Witnessed
By:
------------------------------
All Rights Reserved
Then on the 15th of October I particpated in Court and this is how it went... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DX7ZI7S60w">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DX7ZI7S60w</a>
Prior to my following court appearance I served the following Fee Schedule to the courts
KJF-FEE001 Page (1of1)
Notice:-
Regarding: Fee Schedule
I who am known as Kevin of the F family, being a man of lawful age, sound mind, flesh and blood body and God given Soul to declare the following to be True to the best of my knowledge and ability with God as my Witness so help me God. Take note I am writing in the common understand of the English Language.
On the fifteenth day of October 2009, the man known formally as Judge DH offered to remand a case proceeding against me by Garda JD if it were a case that I was not entering a plea. I informed him that “I waive all benefits and release the court of its duty to perform as consideration”. Judge DH responded saying “I’m remanding this matter, notwithstanding, for a period of two weeks…” asking me to participate in Court 45 at 10:30AM. I stated “With all due respect I do not accept”.
However I have considered the offer and I hereby state my Fee Schedule for an appearance to be €300 [Three hundred Euro] per hour or part thereof effective from 10:30AM on the morning of Thursday the twenty ninth day of October 2009 onwards. If I am incarcerated or otherwise detained without my expressed written consent I hereby state my Fee Schedule to be €3000 [Three thousand Euro] per hour or part thereof, taking effect at the moment of detention.
In Truth, Honour and Sincerity,
Is mise le méas,
By:_____________________.
Kevin – John: F
Witnessed/Verified
By:_____________________.
Witnessed/Verified
By:_____________________.
On the 29th of October I was in court at 10.30. Court began about 10.45 and i was out by 10.50.
I was the first case to be called and when I approached I didn't say anything. The Judge briefly went through the charges with the Garda who had come with the arresting Ban Garda this time. They both had files and I was wondering what they had planned.
The Judge turned to me and said "No Mr F, you are here today to enter a plea, you've had two weeks to consider now how do you plead?" I began to respond saying "before I can even consider entering a plea i need to establish the nature [and cause of the allegations being brought against me]" but he cut me off "No no, remanding this case until the 21st of December". Court clerk began to call next case I remained saying "Sir am I not entitled to a fair and meaningful hearing?.... Is this Justice?" ... The Judge snapped - "escort him out of court".
The two arresting gaurds approached me, the female had her arm out towards me, i said "you have no right to touch me, i will consider it assault, i will leave of my own volition"...they stood and waited while I gathered my things. I turned to Garda JD and said "look at all the trouble you're after causing here" and walked out ahead of them. As I was leaving I asked when he expected me back ( i hadn't actually taken it in the first time he said it - it's a bit surreal when you're up there). The Clerk responded "21st of December" at which point I said "my fee schedule will stand then also" and left.
This was a bit bizarre for me as I had been preparing my case and hoped to get the Judge on his Oath straight away, then request to speak in chambers or private with the Judge - explain my intent, speak to the garda and seek restitution by way of apology and a handshake. Not to mention I was cramming loads as I figured they'd be ready for me this time. So, when it started and ended so abruptly i was kinda perplexed. The thing is now it gave me enough time to try to remedy the situation via notices <i>outside of court</i>. So what follows is a series of Notices which were served to Judge DH, copied to Garda JD, later to be sent to minister for justice
<u><b>Notice
Regarding: Conditional Acceptance</b></u>
DH
In care of Court Services,
15-24 Phoenix Street North,
Smithfield,
Dublin City
Copy to: [Various parties]
I am living sovereign, who is known as Kevin of the F family, being a man of lawful age, sound mind, flesh and blood body and God given soul, do declare the following to be true and accurate to the best of my ability so help me God, with God as my Witness.
Please take note of the following Maxims:
1.All are equal under the Law and equality before the Law is paramount.
2.Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit.
3.An un-rebutted affidavit stands as Truth.
4.An un-rebutted affidavit becomes the default judgement.
5.A claim can be satisfied only by rebuttal by counter-affidavit, resolution by jury or payment.
Note: This notice is to be understood in the common understanding of the English language.
It has not been and is not now my intention to contract with the district court in relation to the matter regarding the events of 11th of October 2009 in Saint Stephens Green, Dublin. An affidavit of events was served to the courts by me; Kevin-John: F on the 28th of October 2009 [Attached for convenience]. This Notice was also served to the Garda Ombudsman on the 29th of October 2009 and I believe the matter is being dealt with accordingly.
It is my understanding that the charges being presented are Acts which are Statutes and all Acts and Statutes are naturally limited in scope and applicability by Bunreacht Na hEireann, the Constitution of Ireland. Furthermore Statutes only have the force of law, by consent.
On the 29th of October 2009, Judge DH offered me an opportunity to participate in court [again] on the 21st of December 2009. My previous affidavit remains un-rebutted by any of the involved parties and it is apparent to me and many other men and women that I have not committed a crime in this instance, and no sworn affidavit of a complaint by another sovereign exists. As outlined in my previous affidavit, not to mention audio-visual documented evidence which has been provided to the Garda Ombudsman and the Courts, Garda JD, MD and another male Garda Siochana, which I know to mean Guardians’ of the Peace, breached their own oaths of office through their actions and in fact violated and breached my peace. I feel that I am the injured party in this instance.
With all that in mind I hereby conditionally accept the request to participate in court on the 21st of December, for the sum of €50,000 (FIFTY THOUSAND EURO) to be paid in full prior to the above date. After what I have experienced with the Garda Siochana and the Judiciary I feel it is my duty to use these funds to disseminate educational information regarding our God given Rights and the nature of law and to ensure these Rights exist, not just for you and I today but for future generations.
AND
To clarify my understanding of law in relation to this matter and to ensure that I am acting honourably and lawfully, please kindly respond to the following questions and requests:
1.Are the Courts Services and the Garda Siochana an organ of the state?
2.Do the Judiciary and members of an Garda Siochana take an oath of office?
3.Must the Judiciary and members of an Garda Siochana act within the law and are they subject to it?
4.Must there be a lawful reason for an arrest?
5.If a man is unlawfully arrested and subsequently detained, is his detention lawful?
6.Do you accept the Maxims listed previously to be supreme in law?
7.Are Statutes and Acts legislative rules of a society?
i.If so, what is the name of the society, of which both the ‘Public Order Act’ and ‘Criminal Justice Act’ are legislated rules of?
ii.Provide proof of claim that I am obliged to be, or am currently a member of that society.
8.Do Statutes and Acts require consent to gain the force of law?
i.If so, please provide proof of my consent to the aforementioned acts being enforced in this instance.
ii.If not, please provide proof for this claim.
9.Are the district Courts in Ireland engaged in the business of witnessing and facilitating transactions of security interests?
10.Do the district Courts require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such service?
Please respond to the ALL requests in no later than 14 [FOURTEEN] days from the date of receipt of this notice, as recorded via registered post. I hereby state the rule of ‘agent and principle’ applies and notice to one is notice to the other. Responses must be via registered post, under oath and full commercial liability. Cheques, postal or money orders may be made out to Kevin-John: F and sent care of the address provided above.
Failure to respond to any and all of the above points, questions or requests will lead me to assume you have withdrawn your offer for my participation in court on the 21st of December AND have ceased all claims against me AND have given up your right to answer these questions at a later date.
Yours sincerely, in truth and honour,
Without malice, ill-will or vexation,
Signed by:_____________________________.
Kevin-John: F Date:_________
All Rights Reserved
Witness/Verified by:_____________________________.
All Rights Reserved
Date:_________
Witness/Verified by:_____________________________.
All Rights Reserved
Date:_________
I waited the fourteen days and then followed up with this Notice:
<b>Notice
Regarding: Non-Response</b>
DH,
In care of Court Services,
15-24 Phoenix Street North,
Smithfield,
Dublin City
Copy to: [Minister for Justice; various other parties]
I am a living sovereign, who is known as Kevin of the F family, being a man of lawful age, sound mind, flesh and blood body and God given soul, do declare the following to be true and accurate to the best of my ability so help me God, with God as my Witness.
Please take note of the following Maxims:
1.All are equal under the Law and equality before the Law is paramount.
2.Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit.
3.An un-rebutted affidavit stands as Truth.
4.An un-rebutted affidavit becomes the default judgement.
5.A claim can be satisfied only by rebuttal by counter-affidavit, resolution by jury or payment.
Note: This notice is to be understood in the common understanding of the English language.
On the tenth day of November 2009 I served notice of conditional acceptance to you, [Judge] DH in relation to a request for me to participate in court on the 21st of December 2009. This notice was served by way of registered post and received on the eleventh day of November 2009. In that notification I outlined my intention to accept your offer to participate in court on the condition that you respond to and fulfil the following questions and requests:
The sum of €50,000 (FIFTY THOUSAND EURO) to be paid in full, by cheque, postal or money order, prior to the court date [twenty first day of December 2009].
AND
A response, under oath, to the following questions and requests:
1.Are the Courts Services and the Garda Siochana an organ of the state?
2.Do the Judiciary and members of an Garda Siochana take an oath of office?
3.Must the Judiciary and members of an Garda Siochana act within the law and are they subject to it?
4.Must there be a lawful reason for an arrest?
5.If a man is unlawfully arrested and subsequently detained, is his detention lawful?
6.Do you accept the Maxims listed previously to be supreme in law?
7.Are Statutes and Acts legislative rules of a society?
i.If so, what is the name of the society, of which both the ‘Public Order Act’ and ‘Criminal Justice Act’ are legislated rules of?
ii.Provide proof of claim that I am obliged to be, or am currently a member of that society.
8.Do Statutes and Acts require consent to gain the force of law?
i.If so, please provide proof of my consent to the aforementioned acts being enforced in this instance.
ii.If not, please provide proof for this claim.
9.Are the district Courts in Ireland engaged in the business of witnessing and facilitating transactions of security interests?
10.Do the district Courts require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such service?
You were requested to respond to the ALL of the above requests in no later than 14 [FOURTEEN] days from the date of receipt of the notice, which was received on the eleventh day of November 2009, as recorded via registered post. I also stated on my previous notice that; failure to respond to any and all of the above points, questions or requests will lead me to assume you have withdrawn your offer for my participation in court on the 21st of December AND have ceased all claims against me AND have given up your right to answer these questions at a later date.
To date you have chosen not to respond to any of my requests and have left me with assumption that you have now ceased and terminated all claims against me and have withdrawn your request for my participation in court. As such I should expect no further correspondences, transgressions or interaction with you in relation to this matter.
However, so as to ensure I am correct in my assumptions and that all claims have been terminated against me, I would like to graciously offer you one final opportunity to respond to the above requests and/or rebut the points made herein in a further 14 [FOURTEEN] days commencing 25th of November 2009. Once again if you choose not to respond to the above points it will mean that all claims against me have been terminated and I am no longer expected to participate in court and my assumptions will stand as sovereign truth.
Yours sincerely, in truth and honour,
Without malice, ill-will or vexation,
Signed by:_____________________________.
Kevin-John: F Date:_________
All Rights Reserved
Witness/Verified by:_____________________________.
All Rights Reserved Date:_________
Witness/Verified by:_____________________________.
All Rights Reserved Date:_________
It was at this point that all documents were sent to the Minister for Justice to make him aware of the actions of what I thought were his agents/officers of justice (?) I recieved the following interesting response:
(Make what you want of that
I havn't sent him the final notice yet because im going to attach an additional letter to him in it seeking some sort of explanation about the above....
So in the Final Notice, I finally had the chance to express my true feelings about what happened and what's happening to us all. I tried to appeal to the spirit of those reading it and I mean everything I say...
<u><b>Final Notice</b></u>
DH
In care of Court Services,
15-24 Phoenix Street North,
Smithfield,
Dublin City
Copy to: [Minister for Justice; various other parties]
I am a living sovereign, who is known as Kevin of the F family, being a man of lawful age, sound mind, flesh and blood body and God given soul, do declare the following to be true and accurate to the best of my ability so help me God, with God as my Witness.
Sir, it has now been fourteen days since you were served with a second notice of
conditional acceptance. You were only required to respond to this Notice if you wished for me to participate in court. As you have chosen not to respond I am to inform you that we are now in agreement that all claims against me have been terminated and I am no longer expected to participate in court and my assumptions are now sovereign truth.
This means that the case can not be called by the Court Clerk on the 21st of December as there are no longer any allegations to answer to. It also means that we are in agreement that there are no grounds to issue a bench warrant or any other warrant for that matter. I have outlined all the facts of the matter by way of affidavits. To date all affidavits served remain un-rebutted by any and all involved parties. This means we are all in agreement as to what happened and that no crime was committed by me. We are also in agreement that, if anybody, I am the injured party in this matter.
I also note that you either chose to ignore or failed to pay the bill sent to you for my time participating in court. Please note I am not interested in this amount and will not pursue the debt any further.
Now that the matter is terminated I would like to express my deep sadness regarding my experience and the realisation that my Government does not seem to have my best interest at heart.
We are all equals’, we are all men sharing an experience on this wonderful earth. We have been given the gift of free will, but more importantly self knowledge and conscience. As intelligent sentient beings we each have the ability to make the lives of others better or worse. There are enough ‘bad people’ out there, products of this society fuelled by greed, ego or circumstance, and we need honest men and women who are willing to stand up for what is right regardless of popular opinion or common practice.
We the people on the land of Ireland fought for centuries for the freedom to institute a Government amongst us that would protect us and preserve our nation. We invested our sovereignty into that Government and its agents on the condition that they uphold and operate within the scope of Bunreacht na hEireann. Surely it is an honour to hold such a position of service to your nation? We trust and expect you to fulfil the duties of your office and most importantly uphold your Oath of office, but more than that we expect you to have and exercise high moral and ethical values. We the people bestow our trust upon you all, and you choose, by your own actions to betray that trust.
I would like to say that I do not think Garda JD is a bad man. I feel his behaviour may have been influenced by what appears to him to be normal or acceptable behaviour by his colleagues. This does not excuse the facts however. Furthermore, David Mc Hugh, I believe that you are also a good man and I’m sure you have a strong sense of fairness and justice. However, I strongly feel that what is being administered in the District Courts with regards statutes and fines is not fair and not just and is in fact a means of extracting revenue from the otherwise peaceful people.
Please read and think deeply about the following quote:
<i><b>“Cowardice asks the question - is it safe? Expediency asks the question - is it politic?
Vanity asks the question - is it popular? But conscience asks the question is it right?
And there comes a time when one must take a position
that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular;
but one must take it because it is right.”</b>
Dr Martin Luther King Jr</i>
This current trend has gone on long enough and I say to all who read this Notice that now is that time. It is time for you to choose, every day to stand up for Justice, Truth, Morality and Conscience. God gave us these gifts, please stop ignoring them.
It is my sincere hope that this experience will not leave a feeling of ill-will or bitterness towards me. It has been a sorry state of affairs for all parties involved but perhaps some lessons were learned on all sides?
Yours sincerely, in truth and honour,
Without malice, ill-will or vexation,
Is mise le méas,
Signed by:_____________________________.
Kevin-John: F Date:_________
All Rights Reserved
Witness/Verified by:_____________________________.
All Rights Reserved Date:_________
Witness/Verified by:_____________________________.
All Rights Reserved Date:_________
That was sent last week. I did not know what to expect from this and I realised this would be a good litmus test to see where we're at. I mean it could have went a few different ways and I was quietly aware about the fact that a bench warrant could have been issued in my absence and who knows? Christmas, knock on the door...you know the rest. I was aware this could have happened and that the Court could have feinged ignorance of all the above (as some people suggest they will do anyway).
I was aware that in spite of the above dialogue I could have been called - but how can I/why would I turn up having served the above? It's could be construed as a contradiction - "am I or amn't I here to answer the allegations?"
So this morning, 21st of December, a few of the guys from TnS went into the Court. The Court location had been changed to the new 'babel' buildings - a sign on the usual court door stated this. They went to the other Court and found my name and Garda JD's on the 10.30 list. Wayne attempted to serve a copy of all the above to the file but at first the clerk would not accept this. They waited around all the while there was no sign of Garda JD [By the way it was a different Judge too]. They went through the list and the lads waited to hear my name being called. If a bench warrant had of been issued I was planning to go to the court after lunch to ask why they were looking for me?
But that wasn't necessary as they never called my case... during a short recess Wayne manged to give the documents to another court official asking to put it in Mr Kevins file, but she couldn't find it and ended up carrying those documents around all day...(?)
They waited until 13.30 when they finish for lunch and a new batch of victims line up for the afternoon and that was that.
I don't think it's hit me yet and im still going over it all. Love to know what do you guys think has happened here? I think this is a victory for our side...
Peace, Love and freedom to you all...
....WTF ???? 
