Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Forum rules
The articles and opinions written on this website , might not reflect the views of the site, We do not give legal advice and in no way are we responsible for what is written by our members

Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby MonacoJim » Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:18 am

Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:44 PM
Subject: Big Positive News against Council Tax


This is BIG news. Roger Hayes, a writer for the 'UK Column' newspaper has publicly and in open court got the judge to agree that the 'person' MR ROGER HAYES is a corporate person, legal fiction and NOT the man known as Roger Hayes. The judge has now ordered the council to go away and come back when and if they can prove their case.

View this PRIVATE Discussion online: http://help.mmseurope.com/discussions/q ... bead086055" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Attachments:
- council_tax_legal_fiction037.jpg http://help.mmseurope.com/discussions/q ... bead086055" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Harmony and peace to all living souls, rgds, Jim
[Life, the only game where the object is to learn the rules.]
User avatar
MonacoJim
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:16 am
Location: Monaco (&UK)
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby Wobbly » Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:23 pm

Cheers Jim.

Superb.
Wobbly
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 2:48 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby Nutty-Norm » Sat Feb 05, 2011 6:27 pm

Ah, The house of cards begins to fall . . . Beautiful
Nutty-Norm
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 6:25 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby markie b » Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:54 am

:lol: i would of loved to of watched that one awsome stuff 8-) do you have transcripts or court case numbers so i can look the case up?
Image Image
markie b
 
Posts: 1997
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:21 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby CSAabused-paul » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:06 pm

Hello,

Great result, do you have transcripts or court case numbers so i can look the case up?
Please, it will aid me greatly with a CSA issue/issues I have,

thank you in advance

csa-abusedpaul.
CSAabused-paul
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:36 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby EUGene » Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:58 pm

come to think of that, where is evidence that it actually happened, maybe it is PR to boost up our morale?
How to Represent yourself in Criminal Court http://www.multiupload.com/QAKQ97OHNC
How to Represent Yourself In Civil Court http://www.multiupload.com/6BKSMHCGCV
User avatar
EUGene
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:28 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby newmannewy » Mon Mar 07, 2011 2:44 pm

If you know your history.. The suffragettes movement was for the right to vote.. Which meant being enfranchised/incorporated.

Dictionary deffinition:
1. To bestow a franchise on.
2. To endow with the rights of citizenship, especially the right to vote.


;)
newmannewy
 

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby Jackisace86 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:18 pm

A few months down the line now i know. But has anybody got a link to the evidence?
Jackisace86
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:08 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby Ben52 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:48 pm

Links are dead! :(
Ben52
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 12:13 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Judge agrees XXXXX is corporate person!!!

Postby geraldine » Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:42 pm

The suffragettes, was for the right of women to vote. Who do you think funded the suffragettes, the Rockefeller and other elite bankers. Their motive was "tax" as only half the nation was being taxed, now they had not just the men but the women as well, also where the mother was teaching the children, they the bankers would now have control of the children, and they could influence their education. So as you can see this has been their desire for so long. Almost everything is in place for them. The beginning of the break up of families, and to indoctrinate the children, because now both parents would be working. Watch Aaron Russo and what he tells of Nick Rockefeller.
geraldine
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Next

Return to Case Law & Precedents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest