bodge wrote:We have architects, pilots, engineers and other specialists who say it was a controlled demolition job. There is no doubt about it, it was a controlled demolition.
There is doubt, obviously, as you are aware.
Controlled demolition does not turn steel to dust, as you are aware.
bodge wrote:There is "NO KNOWN SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE" for Judy Woods "theory" at least at the scale of taking out an entire tower block. None whatsoever.
Yes there is. The fact that you don't know about it and seem to be committed to making sure that you never do know about it, doesn't mean that the science is unknown. The science has been known for decades.
The idea that because a tower block has never been openly taken out in public with secret technology before means that we should dismiss all evidence when secret technology is used to do just that is very poor logic. It basically gives the powers that be the ability to do whatever they want whenever they want, just as long as it is done with secret technology, which is not known to the general public but is known to those who choose to look for evidence of it.
bodge wrote:The Hutchinsons effect "Waves, Fields and resonances" are all theoretical science.
No it isn't, as you are aware.
bodge wrote:No quantifiable evidence exists for a weapon of the scale you suggest that could make a building dissapear (which in fact it did not do) "parts" of the structure "appeared" to vanish into thin air but could be put down to compression and recompression of video (could be).
What an amazing level of denial.
bodge wrote:As to the question where did the towers go, well China of course. They needed to get rid of the evidence as quickly as possible.
Have you got any pictures of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of steel being taken to China?
Where is the steel from the towers after the towers went away, before it was supposedly taken to China? Can you identify it in the pictures of Ground Zero?