New Interview With Dr Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?

[Geronimo]

For once I agree with jimbob but everyone to their own thing eh! I dont think there is any doubt there were hit by planes but no one was on those planes, they where drone aircraft, flown by remote. It has been proven that 15 of the 19 hijackers are still alive and three of them have been given public apologies because of the "alleged stolen IDs" but their names remain on the list of "known" hijackers. Interestingly one of the alleged hijackers was a saudi pilot who was in Tunisia on a course at the time and received a public apology and still on the "database" his DNA is still officially listed as having been found at the crash site. So work that one out.

In the land of the lie nothing is what it seems and even what it doesn't seem..

[bodge]

Thats very cryptic? does it means "anything" is possible?

[vaxine]

I don't expect everyone to agree with lil ol Judy because lets face it it seems far fetched for most people who haven't researched Nazi technology and how it survived the war very much in tacked.
It's only when you realize how advanced they were all those years ago and how that technology was divided to be developed in different parts of the world that you begin to understand the capabilities of weaponry of highly advanced proportions operational today.

[kazz67]

Google Video:


Not to cause any offence - I know all too well how easily that can happen - but there is room in this thread for a little evidence based research that doesn't rely on conjecture.

Love kazz. xxxx

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

Not to cause any offence - I know all too well how easily that can happen - but there is room in this thread for a little evidence based research that doesn't rely on conjecture.

Indeed.

9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 1 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (50mins)
Google Video:



9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 2 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (1hr 33mins)
Google Video:



Steel skyscrapers don't turn to dust without something making that happen. To dismiss the facts as conjecture is highly disingenuous, which is an important function of the "truth movement", and some of the followers within it.

[bodge]

We have architects, pilots, engineers and other specialists who say it was a controlled demolition job. There is no doubt about it, it was a controlled demolition. There is "NO KNOWN SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE" for Judy Woods "theory" at least at the scale of taking out an entire tower block. None whatsoever. The theory is good, the small time desktop scientific experiments are indeed interesting and anything that requires an investigation on this scale has to have a parallel within which it can be viewed. There are known and documented demolitions by which to scientifically measure this event with others that have occurred "officially". The Hutchinsons effect "Waves, Fields and resonances" are all theoretical science. No quantifiable evidence exists for a weapon of the scale you suggest that could make a building dissapear (which in fact it did not do) "parts" of the structure "appeared" to vanish into thin air but could be put down to compression and recompression of video (could be).

As to the question where did the towers go, well China of course. They needed to get rid of the evidence as quickly as possible.

Barry Jennings said moments after the building fell that Mr Hess was blown back inside the building by an explosion, this has been denied implicitly by tptb and a new video has come from a FEMA investigator in hiding in Argentina that shows conclusive proof that Mr Hess is seen shouting out of a 3rd or 4th floor window saying he cant get out because the stairwell has collapsed, before the fire crews got to him the building collapsed. Barry Jennings the Senior Emergency Co-ordinator 2 days before the first NIST report who has claimed all along that the building was blown up from the inside died from "unknown circumstances" his house went up for sale very shortly after and his family cannot be contacted. This is all verifiable and documented.

[bodge]

To dismiss the facts as conjecture is highly disingenuous, which is an important function of the "truth movement", and some of the followers within it.

I personally believe the most important function of the truth movement is to find out what happened to all the passengers. Where did they go? Have they been murdered or "hidden" away? Little if any effort is going into discovering what happened to them, you are all so busy trying to prove what happened. Fck what happened, it happened. Where are those souls?

[Geronimo]

Thats very cryptic? does it means "anything" is possible?

You can never be sure what is really true or what is really false...the trick is to hint at something true being false and vice versa...leave information that can lead to ambiguity...

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

I have always said that the 9/11 truth movement is a set up to bring in a world authority

One of the darlings of the "9/11 truth movement" is David Ray Griffin, who happens to have called for a world government.

... A lot of dirt will be exposed it this process and America will be brought down just as they planed but justice will not be done.

Another element worthy of consideration, which very few people in the "truth movement" have talked about is the concept of the Revelation of the Method, as discussed by Michael A. Hoffman II in a talk he gave in 1987, which can be downloaded from here - http://www.mediafire.com/?00dx9ca11b9esn8

The system is not set up to bring justice it is of their making and their working.

Absolutely. And there are systems within the system, and we are encouraged to misrepresent and misunderstand the system itself and many of the subsystems, and the fact that there is coordination between many of them, even when they are presented as being in opposition.

The second half is linked sorry I missed that but I think you have to pay for it. Well worth it though.

The second half can be downloaded from here for free - http://www.mediafire.com/?jj3gbl5j2zaing5

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

We have architects, pilots, engineers and other specialists who say it was a controlled demolition job. There is no doubt about it, it was a controlled demolition.

There is doubt, obviously, as you are aware.
Controlled demolition does not turn steel to dust, as you are aware.

There is "NO KNOWN SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE" for Judy Woods "theory" at least at the scale of taking out an entire tower block. None whatsoever.

Yes there is. The fact that you don't know about it and seem to be committed to making sure that you never do know about it, doesn't mean that the science is unknown. The science has been known for decades.

The idea that because a tower block has never been openly taken out in public with secret technology before means that we should dismiss all evidence when secret technology is used to do just that is very poor logic. It basically gives the powers that be the ability to do whatever they want whenever they want, just as long as it is done with secret technology, which is not known to the general public but is known to those who choose to look for evidence of it.

The Hutchinsons effect "Waves, Fields and resonances" are all theoretical science.

No it isn't, as you are aware.

No quantifiable evidence exists for a weapon of the scale you suggest that could make a building dissapear (which in fact it did not do) "parts" of the structure "appeared" to vanish into thin air but could be put down to compression and recompression of video (could be).

What an amazing level of denial.

As to the question where did the towers go, well China of course. They needed to get rid of the evidence as quickly as possible.

Have you got any pictures of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of steel being taken to China?

Where is the steel from the towers after the towers went away, before it was supposedly taken to China? Can you identify it in the pictures of Ground Zero?