New Interview With Dr Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?

[jimbobobcat]

Steel skyscrapers don't turn to dust without something making that happen.

they werent actualy made of steel, though, were they ?

we have not even got stated and your alol ready disinfoing

[jezza]

The towers had steel columns forming a core designed to withstand a passenger plane crashing into it. There was no "secret technology" that brought the towers down. Just Bush's brothers security company and some demolition guys. Check out building 7. Its the smoking gun to the whole thing.
The bbc anounced it collapsed 20 mins before it did, with building 7 clearly visible in the background. whatever happened happened. But it f*cking stinks.

[jimbobobcat]

The towers had steel columns forming a core designed to withstand a passenger plane crashing into it.

and thats another lie, where are the design figures that show it was designed to with stand a plane weighing 300 tons ?

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

The towers had steel columns forming a core designed to withstand a passenger plane crashing into it. There was no "secret technology" that brought the towers down. Just Bush's brothers security company and some demolition guys. Check out building 7. Its the smoking gun to the whole thing.

How do you explain the lack of the seismic signal when WTC7 came down? How is it possible for a building that size to collapse to the ground in a controlled demolition without causing any significant seismic signal?

And how is it possible for buildings to come down in a controlled demolition at a rate faster than what is actually physically possible?

How do you explain the lack of steel after the so-called collapse, and how do you explain the fact that the steel can be seen turning to dust?

How do you explain Hurricane Erin?

How do you explain the toasted cars and the levitation?

Dr Wood discusses these things in the interview in the opening post and the videos. If you haven't actually heard the evidence yet then I recommend that you listen to it before you dismiss it out of hand.


9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 1 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (50mins)
Google Video:


9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 2 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (1hr 33mins)
Google Video:

[jezza]

I've seen an interview with the guy who designed the towers saying they were designed to withstand an impact from a Boeing 707, The largest plane in 1973. Pretty much same size as the plane that hit on 911. It's not a lie! The dude had his office at the top of one of the towers. If i was designing a tower that high i'd make pretty damn sure it was designed to withstand anything flying into it. Show me how thats a lie
peace
jezza

[jimbobobcat]

The towers had steel columns forming a core designed to withstand a passenger plane crashing into it. There was no "secret technology" that brought the towers down. Just Bush's brothers security company and some demolition guys. Check out building 7. Its the smoking gun to the whole thing.

How do you explain the lack of the seismic signal when WTC7 came down? How is it possible for a building that size to collapse to the ground in a controlled demolition without causing any significant seismic signal?

And how is it possible for buildings to come down in a controlled demolition at a rate faster than what is actually physically possible?

How do you explain the lack of steel after the so-called collapse, and how do you explain the fact that the steel can be seen turning to dust?



]

ypour just reporting aunty judys mad ramblings

where were the seismagraph situated ? she doesnt say and you dont know, do you

nb it didnt fall faster than phsicaly possible, thats just silly

[jezza]

How is it possible for anything to happen? How is it possible for you to be alive? If you think about it, it's almost impossible. But it happened. All i'm saying is, there are more questions than answers. Don't believe everything the media tells you
peace
jezza

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

I've seen an interview with the guy who designed the towers saying they were designed to withstand an impact from a Boeing 707, The largest plane in 1973. Pretty much same size as the plane that hit on 911. It's not a lie! The dude had his office at the top of one of the towers. If i was designing a tower that high i'd make pretty damn sure it was designed to withstand anything flying into it. Show me how thats a lie
peace
jezza

It's probably this interview with Frank DeMartini

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO1JxpVb2eU

This doesn't actually prove that planes were even flown into the buildings. The video footage is very suspicious, and there are various other factors, as discussed by Morgan Reynolds in this presentation:

WHAT PLANES - Morgan Reynolds - Madison Wisconsin - 5 Aug 2007 (1hr 11mins)
Google Video:

[jezza]

OK. I'm a truther. I want to know what happened that day. But to suggest that planes didn't even hit the buildings is just ridiculous and it's that sort of guff that makes the proper truth movement hard for regular people to believe. We all saw planes hitting the buildings. Are you saying the dozens of live feeds and recorded video has been shopped? I can believe they were drones or empty military planes. Just cool down mate. Try to use analytical thought.
peace
jezza

[Geronimo]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAH6Zt30n58