jimbobobcat wrote:my problem with dame judy, isnt that she posts complete tripe, making wild claims, its that she refuses to back up anything she says and gets stooges to with no idea to back it up for her
ive had a couple of goes with discusing this with varius disiples, and there understanding evaperates at the first or second question,, as hanibal evacuated the thread as soon as questions were asked
Firstly, I'm not on this forum 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, as you know. I'll be logging out after this message too, so if you respond to this post, try not to panic if I don't reply immediately.
Secondly, I tend not to waste much time on people who have made it clear that they are extremely ill-informed and they also have no intention of being intellectually honest.
You said earlier in the thread that the towers were not made of steel. You didn't appear to have been joking either. Maybe you meant that the buildings were built with other materials as well, but given that you were responding to the point that "steel doesn't turn to dust without something making that happen", you seem to have been arguing that there was no steel used to build the towers at all.
Here's another example of the sort of thing that puts you in the not-worth-wasting-time-on category:
bodge wrote:I wont argue with you I suppose its possible, I was wondering if you were aware of the time zones and what time it where she is.
and what time would it have been on fantasy island
dont forget bodge, like rust, conspiracy never sleeps
I hope that clarifies things for you.
jimbobobcat wrote:are you up for discussing the finer points of her claims ? or just want to post vids
There seems to be three main tactics here: 1) arguing that we can't discuss what the evidence actually says in case the general public doesn't like what it says, 2) pretending that the evidence that has been presented doesn't actually exist, 3) general pointlessness and irrelevant chatter.
If you genuinely want to discuss the finer points, and your behaviour suggests that you do not, then start. Find something that Dr Wood
actually says that you disagree with.
If you are genuine, don't make stuff up or talk about what you've heard others attributing to Dr Wood, stick to what she actually presents as evidence. If you disagree with it, why do you disagree with it? What makes it wrong, in your opinion? Are you sure about it being wrong, or are you just assuming that it can't be right in order to defend a pre-existing belief system?Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?
January 18, 2011
Part 1 - http://www.mediafire.com/?2che5q3y4lnlw5w
(34.51MB - 1hr 15mins)
Part 2 - http://www.mediafire.com/?jj3gbl5j2zaing5
(32.5MB - 1hr 10mins)
9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 1 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (50mins)
9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 2 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (1hr 33mins)