New Interview With Dr Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?

[vaxine]

At least she isn't calling for a world government like David Ray Grey, who's truth is he backing do you think?

This of course should read David Ray Griffin.

http://mysite.verizon.net/vze25x9n/id25.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Here are communications with David where he explains why he advocates a world Government.

[bodge]

Scene: Outside an night club

Characters A group of people and a Police officer standing around a man sitting on the floor bleeding from the head

Police Sargent: Ok what has happened here

Woman: That group of guys over there threw something across the road and it hit this guy in the eye

PS: Them? Ok what was it they threw

Woman: Yes them lot..i dont know what it was but it came from them

PS: Was it a stone or brick

Woman: I dont know, could of been

PS: Which?

Woman: I really dont know

PS You were here wasn't you

Woman: Yes but i didnt see what it was

Stander by: Shouldnt you be asking them guys over there what happened

PS: Did you see what it was

SB: Does it really matter at this stage what it was, isn't it more important who it was?

PS: We know who it was, it was one of those guys over there..

PS: (To the crowd) Have any of you got any ideas what might of been thrown..


Crowd: It might of been a bottle, nah it was a brick, noway it was a pork pie, nutcase it was a traffic cone etc etc

Sound familiar?

When a stale pork pie hit him in the eye and ernie bit the dust, Poor Ernie!. Cos he drove the fastest milk cart in the west (it had zero point energy and frightened BP)

[vaxine]

with all due respect... if the nazis were that good they'd have won the war. the russians took them on and they weren't even armed.

And this is why we have to look into the work of Joseph P Farrel. His excellent research into WW2 brings seriously brings into question official versions of what was happening during the war and after.He sights evidence of weapons of mass destruction used on the Russians: "Witowsski confirms the assertion first broached by Renato Vesco that the research for these weapons of mass destruction -a large fuel air bomb has the same destructive effect as a small atom bomb- was undertaken by Prif.Dr. Zippermayer under the apt code name Hexenkessle or "witches' cauldron. Witowski opens our eyes to "Project Lusty" and calls it a "Parallel operation to Paperclip" ; "This concerns facts that not only shed a completely new light on the end of WW2 and the issue of the Third Reich's scientific and technological achievements, but above all are shocking with the awareness that they are still clouded in secrecy."

Farrels books are excellent as are his talks and well worth looking at. He makes no links to 9/11 but his research is pointing to present day high technology. He speaks straight up to the UFO community that Roswell was no alien cover up but experimental high technology cover up, and he speculates that many Nazis ended up in Argentina.

In bringing this information I am trying to open up the tedious ping pong of 9/11 truth videos verses Judy Wood videos which makes for a very closed debate

Here are some links to Farrel videos and talks, follow them up if your serious about alternative research don't bother if you just enjoy putting jibe comments about 9/11 and Judy Wood ( I don't mean you Robespierre thank you for your comment)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k54_o5jMEIQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldmwURQk ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmHlx6_Mk5s" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

my problem with dame judy, isnt that she posts complete tripe, making wild claims, its that she refuses to back up anything she says and gets stooges to with no idea to back it up for her

ive had a couple of goes with discusing this with varius disiples, and there understanding evaperates at the first or second question,, as hanibal evacuated the thread as soon as questions were asked

Firstly, I'm not on this forum 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, as you know. I'll be logging out after this message too, so if you respond to this post, try not to panic if I don't reply immediately.
Secondly, I tend not to waste much time on people who have made it clear that they are extremely ill-informed and they also have no intention of being intellectually honest.

You said earlier in the thread that the towers were not made of steel. You didn't appear to have been joking either. Maybe you meant that the buildings were built with other materials as well, but given that you were responding to the point that "steel doesn't turn to dust without something making that happen", you seem to have been arguing that there was no steel used to build the towers at all.

Here's another example of the sort of thing that puts you in the not-worth-wasting-time-on category:

I wont argue with you I suppose its possible, I was wondering if you were aware of the time zones and what time it where she is.

and what time would it have been on fantasy island

dont forget bodge, like rust, conspiracy never sleeps

I hope that clarifies things for you.

are you up for discussing the finer points of her claims ? or just want to post vids

There seems to be three main tactics here: 1) arguing that we can't discuss what the evidence actually says in case the general public doesn't like what it says, 2) pretending that the evidence that has been presented doesn't actually exist, 3) general pointlessness and irrelevant chatter.

If you genuinely want to discuss the finer points, and your behaviour suggests that you do not, then start. Find something that Dr Wood actually says that you disagree with.

If you are genuine, don't make stuff up or talk about what you've heard others attributing to Dr Wood, stick to what she actually presents as evidence. If you disagree with it, why do you disagree with it? What makes it wrong, in your opinion? Are you sure about it being wrong, or are you just assuming that it can't be right in order to defend a pre-existing belief system?


Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?
January 18, 2011

Part 1 - http://www.mediafire.com/?2che5q3y4lnlw5w (34.51MB - 1hr 15mins)
Part 2 - http://www.mediafire.com/?jj3gbl5j2zaing5 (32.5MB - 1hr 10mins)

---

9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 1 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (50mins)
Google Video:


9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 2 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (1hr 33mins)
Google Video:

[jimbobobcat]

cool

ok hanibal

lets do it, we will take her points one by one if thats ok

my concern about judge judy is she uses inexact words to describe things and by inexact i mean misleading or in some cases just wrong, but which end up giving a false4 impresion of what the evidence is and how strong it is,, as an example, sayiong its a steel building and that steel doesnt turn to dust,,, , well its not an exclusively or even predometly a steel building, it contains concrete which does turn to dust, and of course steel does turn to dust, if by dust you mean particulate matter,,, so that statment is wrong , incorrect and very misleading

but lets run with this example

the filing cabinet


thousands survived the 'collapse' of two of the largest office buildings in the world? Why did the metal of this single surviving file cabinet show severe distortion/warping that is characteristic of the metal distortion/warping seen in The Hutchison Effect experiments? Why were there pieces of paper fused to the metal inside this remaining file cabinet, yet the paper was unburnt? Furthermore, why were numerous intact plastic ID cards found in the rubble? How did numerous plastic ID cards survive the 'collapses', yet thousands of metal file cabinets and door knobs did not? The following video explains these facts more clearly:

she claims that the remailns of the contents of the filing cabinet had FUSED with the steel,, ie paper and steel had fused together,,, fused means that they , paper and steel, had melted and bonded at a melecular level, which is of course impossible,, a quick check of the vid shows that the cabinet has distorted and folded its self around the end of the file holder5s

so,,, please explain how steel and paper fuse together,, and then when you cant do that, explain why someone who claims to de a Dr, cant tell the differance between fused and folded

off you go

[robespierre]

And this is why we have to look into the work of Joseph P Farrel. His excellent research into WW2 brings seriously brings into question official versions of what was happening during the war and after.He sights evidence of weapons of mass destruction used on the Russians: "Witowsski confirms the assertion first broached by Renato Vesco that the research for these weapons of mass destruction -a large fuel air bomb has the same destructive effect as a small atom bomb- was undertaken by Prif.Dr. Zippermayer under the apt code name Hexenkessle or "witches' cauldron. Witowski opens our eyes to "Project Lusty" and calls it a "Parallel operation to Paperclip" ; "This concerns facts that not only shed a completely new light on the end of WW2 and the issue of the Third Reich's scientific and technological achievements, but above all are shocking with the awareness that they are still clouded in secrecy."

Farrels books are excellent as are his talks and well worth looking at. He makes no links to 9/11 but his research is pointing to present day high technology. He speaks straight up to the UFO community that Roswell was no alien cover up but experimental high technology cover up, and he speculates that many Nazis ended up in Argentina.

In bringing this information I am trying to open up the tedious ping pong of 9/11 truth videos verses Judy Wood videos which makes for a very closed debate

Here are some links to Farrel videos and talks, follow them up if your serious about alternative research don't bother if you just enjoy putting jibe comments about 9/11 and Judy Wood ( I don't mean you Robespierre thank you for your comment)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k54_o5jMEIQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldmwURQk ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmHlx6_Mk5s" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You've studied this far more than i have so i cannot doubt your claims with any real conviction... however, why couldn't it be the case that these weapons were simply made more recently?

i'm having difficulty also believing that the germans had weapons of mass destruction on this type of scale. as we know, or rather the official version teaches us, the nazi's used gas to kill many of the jews so didn't mind killing on a large scale at all. they were having trouble getting past our air force and navy, so why didn't they just evaporate us or something?

[bodge]

The zero point energy video by Hutchinson shows how him run a tiny little electric motor from some crystal going through some kind of converter but you could do that with lemons. The amount of power and we are talking gygawatts of power would mean the device if it was running off zero point energy would be pretty massive. The studio set up for the examples of metal manipulation are on a very small scale and in shielded conditions. IF and I do mean "if" a weapon of the type you describe was used it would definately have affected many other buildings in the area and they would have ALL collapsed because the energy field would be massive and widely spread.

The so called "fused" parts are not actually fused at all but are as a result of the cabinet being crushed out of shape and if you look at what Hutchinson calls "fused" (the butter knife example") the knife is actually inside the metal and bonded as if put in there while it was molten and this though an interesting side effect does not occur anywhere at WTC.

You constantly try to quote these things as "evidence" and they are not. You are the victim of misunderstood science and you have clung to it as a pastor clings to his religion neither are fools, just badly mistaken.

[masonfreeparty]

is this the bad cop good cop thread?

[bodge]

You know better than that mason, backing up the truth isnt playing the game and I dont make a habit of backing people up, I just like to have my say.

[vaxine]

You've studied this far more than i have so i cannot doubt your claims with any real conviction... however, why couldn't it be the case that these weapons were simply made more recently?

i'm having difficulty also believing that the germans had weapons of mass destruction on this type of scale. as we know, or rather the official version teaches us, the nazi's used gas to kill many of the jews so didn't mind killing on a large scale at all. they were having trouble getting past our air force and navy, so why didn't they just evaporate us or something?

Farrel brings together witness testimony and recently declassified information to join the dots. This clip carries testimony from a pilot of witnessing A bomb testing in 1944

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoevR-cJ ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This knowledge was used to negotiate at the end of the war, except that contrary to history the Nazis held the upper hand. The US and the west got the atom bomb fissionable fuel and infrared proximity fuses. Russia got enrichment scientists who had developed this technology .However, the Daddy of all technologys and the main focus of Nazis development was the Bell http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx9P3XVB ... re=related" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This technology went with them after the war for further research and development.

What was it's purpose?
"multi purpose engineering to investigate the methods of controlling space-time and transducing energy from it for the purpose of A. Free energy
B.Field propulsion
C.Weaponizarion. A doomsday weapon that would make the hydrogen bomb look like a
firecracker."