New Interview With Dr Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed "collapse."
The buildings were not destroyed faster than a free fall collapse other than by about 2 seconds.

What does "other than by about 2 seconds" mean?
Where are your calculations?
How long do you think it would take to bring down a 110-storey skyscraper in a controlled demolition?
How would you manage to turn the steel to dust in the process?

They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
The towers did not undergo mid air pulverisation, that was the result of explosives.

So, there was no mid air pulverisation because "that" (the mid air pulverisation?) was the result of explosives?

What are you saying?

The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.
That bit proves nothing of significance.

It does actually, unless you assume that hundreds of thousands of tonnes of steel crashing down onto something would not damage it much. Obviously that is a ridiculous assumption with no basis in reality.

The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage, if any.
They where deep underground and the building was designed to behave that way.

Where is your proof that the buildings were designed to sustain only light damage to the rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars, in the event of a controlled demolition?

The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends. There were reports that "The Gap" was looted.
Again a design feature.

Again, do you have anything other than your own opinion?

The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.
Thermate burns slow in comparison to C4 you get a more controlled demolition.

Do you understand what you are saying?
How would thermate, however slowly it burns - bearing in mind that according to you "the buildings were not destroyed faster than a free fall collapse other than by about 2 seconds" - how would that almost completely remove the seismic signal? Do you know what a seismic signal is?

The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.
Your directed energy theory doesnt behave that way if you watch the vids closely.

Your opinion again, which is observably incorrect.

The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was not significantly greater than background noise.
Thermate doesnt explode in the conventional sense it burns much more slowly but with extreme temperatures to cut through the steel rather than tearing apart instantly.

Are you suggesting that the thermate got rid of the steel so that it didn't fall and hit the ground? Or are you saying that the thermate dramaticallt reduced the seismic signal in some other way, and if so, how exactly?

9. The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
Totally wrong, only 80% percent of the soft parts of the building ie concrete, prefab walls etc.

To back up your ill-informed (but relentless) opinion, can you post some pictures of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of hypothetical solid steel at ground zero immediately after what you are suggesting was a controlled demolition?

If not, why not? Where did the steel go?

11. One file cabinet with folder dividers survived.
12. No toilets survived or even recognizable portions of one.
13. Windows of nearby buildings had circular and other odd-shaped holes in them.
All very easily explainable and very consistent with a standard demolition job.

No it isn't. But if you want to explain how a standard demolition job would completely destroy all of the toilets or even recognizable portions of one, and create circular and other odd-shaped holes in the windows of nearby buildings, then explain it.

Just saying that you believe they are explainable is worthless.

"Fuzzballs" Saying that ALL the world trade center wreckage went up into smoke and was vaporized AS SHE DOES

Actually the word is dustified, because vapourized implies heat, and there wasn't a significant amount of heat, certainly nowhere near enough to vapourize steel.

is the mark of an idiot.

This coming from a man who believes that something becomes a fact when a large enough number of people believe it to be true?

911 is up to its eyeballs in trolls from the government.

Yes, misrepresenting evidence and lying left, right and centre. You haven't spotted any around here have you?

And to be honest, she is going to have to come off a little stronger in the realm of credibility, if she wants people to trust a single thing she says.

I bet she's devestated at this slight from such an intellectual giant.

About that simple. Straight and forward. We are not in high School here, she needs to wake up and smell the coffee, or get the hell off the train. Seriously. She has two choices. Either stop with her Jibberish bullshit, or step up to the plate and offer rational ideas and concepts which cannot be ridiculed by 99.99999% of the people.

You do understand that you're not the moderator of the world, don't you?

[HannibaltheHerbivore]

People who actually want to look at the evidence can check these out:

Judy Wood - Where Did the Towers Go?
January 18, 2011

Part 1 - http://www.mediafire.com/?2che5q3y4lnlw5w (34.51MB - 1hr 15mins)
Part 2 - http://www.mediafire.com/?jj3gbl5j2zaing5 (32.5MB - 1hr 10mins)

---

9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 1 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (50mins)
Google Video:


9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 2 (Re-edit) - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007 (1hr 33mins)
Google Video:


-----

http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/key.html

Some of the principal evidence that must be explained:

1. The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed "collapse."
2. They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
3. The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.
4. The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage, if any.
5. The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends. There were reports that "The Gap" was looted.
6. The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.
7. The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.
8. The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was not significantly greater than background noise.
9. The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
10. The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
11. One file cabinet with folder dividers survived.
12. No toilets survived or even recognizable portions of one.
13. Windows of nearby buildings had circular and other odd-shaped holes in them.
14. In addition to the odd window damage, the marble facade was completely missing from around WFC1 and WFC2 entry, with no other apparent structural damage.
15. Fuzzballs, evidence that the dust continued to break down and become finer and finer.
16. Truckloads of dirt were hauled in and hauled out of the WTC site, a pattern that continues to this day.
17. Fuming of the dirt pile. Fuming decreased when watered, contrary to fumes caused by fire or heat.
18. Fuzzyblobs, a hazy cloud that appeared to be around material being destroyed.
19. The Swiss-Cheese appearance of steel beams and glass.
20. Evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation, as demonstrated by the near-instant rusting of affected steel.
21. Weird fires. The appearance of fire, but without evidence of heating.
22. Lack of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. No evidence of burned bodies.
23. Columns were curled around a vertical axis like rolled-up carpets, where overloaded buckled beams should be bent around the horizontal axis.
24. Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side cars that appeared to be burning.
25. Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust, and into Vesey Street in front of WTC6, plus a cylindrical arc was cut into Bankers Trust.
26. All planes except top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes (120 seconds) after WTC 1 had been destroyed.
27. Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.
28. The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings.
29. More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during the clean-up process than from the destruction of more than a million tons of buildings above it.
30. Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged and destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix.
31. The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared.
32. For more than seven years, regions in the ground under where the main body of WTC4 stood have continued to fume.
33. The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the total mass of the buildings.
34. The WTC7 rubble pile was too small for the total mass of the building and consisted of a lot of mud.
35. Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by "unexplained" waves, a plane turning into a mid-air fireball, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions.
36. Eyewitness testimony of Scott-pack explosions in fire trucks and fire trucks exploding that were parked near the WTC.
37. There were many flipped cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex near trees with full foliage.
38. Magnetometer readings in Alaska recorded abrupt shifts in the earth's magnetic field with each of the events at the WTC on 9/11.
39. Hurricane Erin, located just off Long Island on 9/11/01, went virtually unreported in the days leading up to 9/11, including omission of this Hurricane on the morning weather map, even though that portion of the Atlantic Ocean was shown on the map.
40. Sillystring, the appearance of curious cork-screw trails.
41. Uncanny similarities with the Hutchison Effect, where the Hutchison Effect exhibits all of the same phenomena listed above.

* Is it possible that such a technology exist? Since invention of the microwave for cooking in 1945 and lasers in 1955*, commercial and military development of directed-energy technology has proceeded apace, so use of directed-energy technology is likely to exist -- and the data tells us it does exist.

What explanations have been suggested to explain these phenomena?
Seven explanations have been identified:

a. Natural causes such as earthquakes and hurricanes
b. Arson
c. The official theory of airplane impact, fires and weakened steel collapsing
d. Conventional demolition with explosives such as RDX, dynamite, etc.
e. Demolition via thermite or its variants
f. Fission or fusion nukes (and clean bombs)
g. Beam weapons, energy weapons, directed-energy weapons (DEW)

(CCD-BiB) = "Conventional Controlled Demolition" with "Bombs in the Building"

Beam Weapons, Energy Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW):

We have used the terms "beam weapons" and "directed energy weapons" to refer to unconventional weapons (exotic weapons) that are energy weapons. We broadly define DEW as Energy that is Directed and is used as a Weapon. The full range of these weapons is classified information, so we make no limits or distinction of categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that is available. In the following paragraph, we have listed some of the possibilities we are aware of.

Our critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet we make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do we make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it involved scalar weapons, whether it was HAARP (more here and here), whether it involved a nuclear process (e.g. NDEW, more info), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons (cDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what kind of accelerator was used, nor do we claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts that were in the weapon(s).

What we do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed.

"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

-----

[Dr Wood] has two choices. Either stop with her Jibberish bullshit, or step up to the plate and offer rational ideas and concepts which cannot be ridiculed by 99.99999% of the people.

Let my name stand among those
who are willing to bear
ridicule and reproach
for the truth's sake,
and so earn some right to rejoice
when the victory is won.
Louisa May Alcott

Not even a hint of irony.

[bodge]

That last statement was just pure childish and shows where your mind is. History will show up in time and you can suck eggs and eat humble pie as your silly theory is shot to pieces, in time.

Worlds moderator