Lord Ashbourne of Ashburne

[Freeman Stephen]

An argument for despotic rule leads to the question of who should be the despot, which shows how unlike a human body a non consensual human community is. The human body is not some man made design like a monarchy or any other form of dictatorship, but you will note that men like hobbes do not receive the same resistance from the violent as those who since babylon have said that freedom is truly a law of nature. Whether they have been persecuted for saying god gave us free will or that slavery should be abolished, it is ironic that the freedom to control and manipulate humankind is the one thing that destroys freedom.

[HVYMTL]

Sure, the human brain does not have "king" or "president" neuron, rather decisions are arrived at by the aggregate function of all the 100 billion neurons working together.

However having said that, not all the neurons are equal either, some are dedicated to maintaining the bodies autonomic system, heart rhythm, breathing and so on, whilst others do nothing but process and react to incoming sensory data.

The government would have us believe they are the brain, but are they really? I would suggest that since they are into forcing things to happen they are more akin to the bodies muscles, with academia being the real equivalent of the decision making neurons.

This analogy leads towards a model of scientific meritocracy being the most logical basis for a society, but there is no way that's going to come about whilst the political class remain addicted to power, domination and exploitation.

Also your presuming that Monarchy is a system designed by man, that's not what they claim! "dieu et mon droit" says it all really. There are a number of possibilities there;

1) there is a god and monarchy is his idea

2) there is a god and he thinks republics are best

3) there is no god, and every political system is bullshit designed to implement human livestock farming

I guess it's up to each of us to work out what we believe for ourselves. Personally, god or not, I'd rather live in a properly maintained and fully functional Constitutional Monarchy than any other type of system. Preferably one on a island a thousand miles from the nearest possible enemy nation. Think about that.

[stompy]

well considering that petition was in 2001 and the only reply lord ashbourne got was a small letter about how the queens looking closely at this sitution nothing has really happened other than lord ashbourne and the other 3 barons geting jucked out of parliement(as far as i am aware) i wouldnt hold your breath for a quick reply although if the 4 barons remember that although they arent in parliement anymore they still have balls and have a legitimate enough reason as far as i care for them to try again with the backing of all these new aware people that have woke up since then(ie me)

[HVYMTL]

It all boils down to the concept of duty, until those events in 2001 it was everyone's duty to offer their consent, now it is duty to withhold it wherever possible. The problem being that they won't acknowledge the problem and will carry on doing as they do regardless of the fact that they are behaving unlawfully.

[dandyman]

Without Prejudice,
well sort of, as far as I can tell, it's not that we evade justice by not appearing before the Queens court, rather as Lord Ashbourne is your lawful liege, any suspicion that you have broken the Law should be referred to M'Lord's court instead of HM's. As his duty is to keep us within the law of the land, we are under his authority and his responsability.
However, as you quite rightly said, legislation should not apply to us, for we are not answerable to HM's servants anymore, that includes the commoners sat in parliament. We are answerable to Lord Ashbourne though.
I have put this assumption to my solicitor, to find out the truth, I'm hoping for more conclusive news one way or another, in the near future.

Now we are cooking on gas!

So Lord Ashbourne is a sort of backup King, who is there in case the King (or Queen as the case may be) has been captured and is being held unlawfully and forced to sign legislations which are contrary to the constitution. For instance making people's cars forfeiture by seizing them prior to the driver having been convicted by a jury of their peers in a court of law.

Therefore all actions of rebellion, all transgressions of legislature are completely lawful under the authority of Lord Ashbourne.

This could be one of the most important bits of information we have uncovered yet!

I guess Lord Ashbourne cannot possibly personally authorise every single action to be taken by everyone who is on our side, so the question is whether the courts will recognise standing under the authority of Lord Ashbourne as a defence without any sort of documentation to prove it after the fact.

Depending how my case comes out on the 7th of next month I might be needing another red HVY MTL car ^^

It has to be red... it's traditional.



The other team wear Brown as far as I can tell...

[Wes]

True democracy doesn't work either

Democracy is two lions and a lamb voting on what's for dinner