The idea of a Monarch King or Queen will always take the assumption that they are above the rest of society and NOT equal
our Queen took an oath and broke that oath when she allowed us to be subjected to European Laws.
Hold on just one moment... the democratically elected government made that treaty. IF your right that monarchs always take the assumption they are above everyone, then why did the Queen risk being charged with treason in order to destroy her own kingdom (Queendom doesn't sound quite right)?
On the one hand your complaining that the monarch is above politics, is not equal and can exert influence over politics and the will of the people as expressed through their elected representatives in Parliament, and on the other hand your complaining that the Queen didn't hold her self above the democratic process in order to influence it... make up your mind, do you want the game to have a referee or not?
Also consider that not going along with the EU might of resulted in another war in Europe, and also that the Queen may of been co-erced. If you believe Diana was murdered, then you have to admit if the Queen was told, "sign here or Harry get's it", she would probably, and quite understandably, sign the bit of paper. The Royals are not bullet proof, and their traditional role which worked in the age of castles and swords, is not so easy in this day and age.
Nobody in the press or media will mention that because they are too busy licking Liz's backside in the hope that one day she might stick a ribbon on them which gives them the status of OBE or MBE or even Sir/Dame.
What utter rubbish, for a start the documents proving that treason has been committed have only recently been released under the 30 year law (see the videos by Albert Burgess), for seconds the media is controlled and coerced by the very same people who are shoe-horning us into the EU anyway.
Just what do you expect the Queen to do exactly? If she interferes with the government, then she is a tyrant and a despot who doesn't want us to join the EU because it undermines her power and how dare she hold her self above the will of the people etc etc etc, and if she does nothing she is a traitor and has let us down... this is a untenable situation for a frail old woman to be in!
SHE'S JUST A HUMAN BEING AND SHE'S AN OLD WOMAN.. COMPRENDEZ?
all in favour of prince harry taking the healm?
In 1173 my ancestor Simon sided with Prince Henry the younger in a rebellion. It was quite a shock for me to discover that and the fact that Harry's real name is actually Henry, and I have a feeling that if it came to it, and for what little it's worth, I might well decide to back Harry if he decided to stand against his brother.
plus hes a weed smoker so hes already more in touch with most of us than the rest of his family
Always a good sign
true he might have a shitty blood line on his fathers side but he has the blood of diana aswell so i say lets give him a chance!
Actually there is some speculation that Harry is actually the son of James Hewitt.
As for "Shitty" DNA, thank you for the insult; apparently I've probably got a strand or two of that stuff myself, but I'll try not to let it make me feel superior to you or anything... ROFL.