The question to my mind is this; do we actually need leaders at all?
Definition : to "lead"
1. To be first; be ahead.
2. To go first as a guide.
3. To act as commander, director, or guide.
The notion we need a leader presupposes the notion that we need to move in a direction which we are incapable of finding without that leader, that we are lost in a darkened maze.
Maybe that was true once, but is it true now?
Do we actually need to go anywhere at all, or have we already arrived at the destination, as in, now that we have had the renaissance and enlightenment, and our scientific and technological progress is accelerating exponentially, are we not already, or at the very least already on a course to, the final destination?
If we do not need leaders then what are these suited people doing in Parliament exactly? As far as I can see they are clinging onto old outdated rhetorical garbage such as the democracy delusion in order to fool the people into handing over a large fraction of their wealth to a parasitical banking elite.
These people are not 'leading' us anywhere, they are simply manipulating what already exists into further production of wealth that can then be confiscated and funnelled upwards to the people who control them, so that those people can further entrench and expand their ability to confiscate more wealth in the future.
The Parliamentary system which has been corrupted and co-opted by the parasitical elite class has only one Achilles heal in that it can be lawfully dissolved by the Monarch, but all available evidence, including John's Affidavit, points to the conclusion that the Monarch has been induced into unlawful captivity and is unable to make that move. (The Monarch is in Check, possibly Check-Mate)
The question then is what other pieces in the "game" are holding the Soveriegn in check, and how can their influence be removed. This further begs the question, do we actually want "God" to "Save" the Queen, or are these terms all actually non-sense delusions?
Charlie Veitch asked on one of his videos, is there actually such thing as a Prince?
Prof Richard Dawkins promotes in his book The God Delusion that there is no deity in the first instance to do any "saving".
So therefore we have "None-existent-thing" Save "The ordinary person lots of people delusionally refer to as The Queen".
None of any of this stuff actually advances scientific progress, and the lifting of the billions from poverty. The upkeep costs of the "game" is insignificant in terms of the financial system itself, but we have to ask what does it actually achieve, if anything?
So if these people are all delusional, and everyone who plays or supports the "game" is also delusional, who then are our real leaders? Who is actually taking us in the right direction?
I would submit that it is the world's scientists and prominent theoretical physicists like Dr Michio Kaku and Prof Stephen Hawking who are the true leaders in this age, and that what we need to do is contemplate a paradigm shift whereby we reorganise the "game" such that we maximise the benefit their work is bringing us by following their lead.
Science Save Humanity.