The basement

[x]

I haven't read anything only that first passage which was sent to me, like you say you have to look at it metaphorically to understand it.

another quick question....

if letters are connected to numbers what are numbers connected to???

The knee bone?

hi geron

as always love your sense of humour mate how are you?

John x

Im not too bad John, Didn't have much of a Christmas, iv just started seeing a right on, ex feminist, PC, town hall baggy trousered security guard. When i suggested we go buy a real Christmas tree not one of those carrier bag recycled plastic ones, she rounded on me and accused me of wanting to "murder a tree to a stump and then dress it's remains up like a seasonal strumpet" I dont know what i see in her, perhaps the fact i can rest my laptop on her chest as i stare into her eyes might have something to do with it..[/quote]

thank you for making me chuckle geron!

John x

[MultiMaddo85]

my suggestion about freewill comes from the fact that if we trully want for a better place to live then we must eradicate what causes the problems in the first place and the simple problem humanity sufferes from is the ability to use freewill which directly causes all the problems.

Cool I get ya - I'm don't agree though dude - surely freewill is what makes humanity, like tragedy & despair can make beautiful poetry, how we feel most alive when in danger - so many things, what brings out humanities beauty is also what causes it's uglyness - but humans aren't always the sources of our problems - remove free will and we'd still have an ice age at some point, volcanoes, earthquakes and natural disasters and the most emotionally painful experience or disaster we face in life is the loss of a loved one, which can't be avoided or changed, just like a natural disaster, we must face it - saying free will causes us problems so it must go is a right cop out - isn't it? We should grow up and take some responsibility - "the child's not old enough to play with the toy, take it away"

[MultiMaddo85]

EDIT - ooops double hit

[x]

Does the oath that all MPs, judges, and magistrates take specifically outlaw all EU Law in the UK?

Specifically if the oath includes the Oath of Supremacy then all EU law is outlawed by the following phrase:

Text of the Oath of Supremacy as published in 1559:

I, A. B., do utterly testify and declare in my conscience that the Queen's Highness is the only supreme governor of this realm, and of all other her Highness's dominions and countries, as well in all spiritual or ecclesiastical things or causes, as temporal, and that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority ecclesiastical or spiritual within this realm; and therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all foreign jurisdictions, powers, superiorities and authorities, and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear faith and true allegiance to the Queen's Highness, her heirs and lawful successors, and to my power shall assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, privileges and authorities granted or belonging to the Queen's Highness, her heirs or successors, or united or annexed to the imperial crown of this realm. So help me God, and by the contents of this Book.



Going back in time:

Promissory Oaths Act 1868 says:
I do swear that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance too Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her Heirs and Successors, according to law...

This is a shorten version of:
The parliamentary Oaths Act 1866 says:
I A.B. do swear that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance too Her Majesty Queen Victoria ; and I do faithfully promise to maintain and support the Succession to the Crown, as the same stands limited and settled by virtue of the Act passed in the Reign of King William the Third intituled "An Act for the further limitation of the Crown, and better securing the rights and liberties of the Subject," ...[I believe this to refer to the 1689 Bill of Rights]

The 16689 Bill of Rights says:
New Oaths of Allegiance, &c.

And that the Oathes hereafter mentioned be taken by all Persons of whome the Oathes of Allegiance and Supremacy might be required by Law instead of them And that the said Oathes of Allegiance and Supremacy be abrogated.

Allegiance.

I A B doe sincerely promise and sweare That I will be faithfull and beare true Allegiance to their Majestyes King William and Queene Mary Soe helpe me God.

Supremacy.

I A B doe sweare That I doe from my Heart Abhorr, Detest and Abjure as Impious and Hereticall this damnable Doctrine and Position That Princes Excommunicated or Deprived by the Pope or any Authority of the See of Rome may be deposed or murdered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever. And I doe declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God.

[Forgetting about the Ecclesiasticall or Spiritual for the moment, does this also stop the Temporal EU forces of darkness?]

to realise this you must first realise what power exists behind the power you suggest and would such power in reality allow itself to be ruled by a lesser power?

John x

[non-conformist]

Well if the queen, in her silence by acquiescence is she not accepting rule from Europe and abdicating her sovereignty, Did you ever get a reply to your affidavit from those ladies? There's Treason in them there shires...Can't we just declare our sovereignty and have a happy new year whatever that means to you?

[x]

i will be back on soon but for now i am off up the wooden hill. good night to you all and thank you it has been fun!

John x

[lucifer777]

the word is the creator, sound and light, thats it.

[HuGe]

... and please remember you are responsible for what you post and no one else is, so before you do, please take that into consideration.

right oh then mr clever clogs...

if you strangle a smurf... what colour does it turn ?

[ljtherock]

Hi John,

this passage is the opening passage from the book of genesis

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

What does this mean? if the word was before god then what is the word?

By the way John said it a bit ironic

Where in that passage does it state that the Word was before God...

[ljtherock]

Hi John,

this passage is the opening passage from the book of genesis

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

What does this mean? if the word was before god then what is the word?

By the way John said it a bit ironic

hi luci

in my opinion the word must be before god as god is the real name of the church and the church - or should I say the temple - is god. this was created by words and is maintained by the same. maybe john's message was one that has not been trully understood. apart from that i cannot comment for i have only ever read a few lines of that book as i have many others.

John x

Hello John, good to see you taking an active role again.

If the church were God, then how is it that Jesus stated not to go to the churches, not to become priests etc?

By the way, Jesus was referred to as the Word, perhaps that would give lucifer a clue as to what he enquires...