PURPLE
ps Could someone who is going on about "the word was with god..." please read the book of genesis and work out the basic fact that you dont even know what book your going on about let alone anything else.
Moderator: x
Freeman Stephen wrote:PURPLE
ps Could someone who is going on about "the word was with god..." please read the book of genesis and work out the basic fact that you dont even know what book your going on about let alone anything else.
John Harris wrote:atlas_shrugged wrote:Does the oath that all MPs, judges, and magistrates take specifically outlaw all EU Law in the UK?
Specifically if the oath includes the Oath of Supremacy then all EU law is outlawed by the following phrase:
Text of the Oath of Supremacy as published in 1559:
I, A. B., do utterly testify and declare in my conscience that the Queen's Highness is the only supreme governor of this realm, and of all other her Highness's dominions and countries, as well in all spiritual or ecclesiastical things or causes, as temporal, and that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority ecclesiastical or spiritual within this realm; and therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all foreign jurisdictions, powers, superiorities and authorities, and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear faith and true allegiance to the Queen's Highness, her heirs and lawful successors, and to my power shall assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, privileges and authorities granted or belonging to the Queen's Highness, her heirs or successors, or united or annexed to the imperial crown of this realm. So help me God, and by the contents of this Book.
Going back in time:
Promissory Oaths Act 1868 says:
I do swear that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance too Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her Heirs and Successors, according to law...
This is a shorten version of:
The parliamentary Oaths Act 1866 says:
I A.B. do swear that I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance too Her Majesty Queen Victoria ; and I do faithfully promise to maintain and support the Succession to the Crown, as the same stands limited and settled by virtue of the Act passed in the Reign of King William the Third intituled "An Act for the further limitation of the Crown, and better securing the rights and liberties of the Subject," ...[I believe this to refer to the 1689 Bill of Rights]
The 16689 Bill of Rights says:
New Oaths of Allegiance, &c.
And that the Oathes hereafter mentioned be taken by all Persons of whome the Oathes of Allegiance and Supremacy might be required by Law instead of them And that the said Oathes of Allegiance and Supremacy be abrogated.
Allegiance.
I A B doe sincerely promise and sweare That I will be faithfull and beare true Allegiance to their Majestyes King William and Queene Mary Soe helpe me God.
Supremacy.
I A B doe sweare That I doe from my Heart Abhorr, Detest and Abjure as Impious and Hereticall this damnable Doctrine and Position That Princes Excommunicated or Deprived by the Pope or any Authority of the See of Rome may be deposed or murdered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever. And I doe declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God.
[Forgetting about the Ecclesiasticall or Spiritual for the moment, does this also stop the Temporal EU forces of darkness?]
to realise this you must first realise what power exists behind the power you suggest and would such power in reality allow itself to be ruled by a lesser power?
John x
non-conformist wrote:Well if the queen, in her silence by acquiescence is she not accepting rule from Europe and abdicating her sovereignty, Did you ever get a reply to your affidavit from those ladies? There's Treason in them there shires...Can't we just declare our sovereignty and have a happy new year whatever that means to you?
ljtherock wrote:John Harris wrote:lucifer777 wrote:Hi John,
this passage is the opening passage from the book of genesis
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
What does this mean? if the word was before god then what is the word?
By the way John said it a bit ironic
hi luci
in my opinion the word must be before god as god is the real name of the church and the church - or should I say the temple - is god. this was created by words and is maintained by the same. maybe john's message was one that has not been trully understood. apart from that i cannot comment for i have only ever read a few lines of that book as i have many others.
John x
Hello John, good to see you taking an active role again.
If the church were God, then how is it that Jesus stated not to go to the churches, not to become priests etc?
By the way, Jesus was referred to as the Word, perhaps that would give lucifer a clue as to what he enquires...
ljtherock wrote:@John H...
Tell me John, what is this fail safe that was built in you speak of?
bebop wrote:hi John
can you just run through were we are up to with the birth certificate thing
John Harris wrote:bebop wrote:hi John
can you just run through were we are up to with the birth certificate thing
hi bebop
i am sorry to tell you that is something i let go of about two years ago and something i won't be visiting again. i am sure there are plenty on the forum that know far more than me regarding this subject.
sorry
John x
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest