My Council Tax

[DominicJay]

Hi there everyone,

So this is me, trying my very best to expose what we all know is wrong. Over the last few months I’ve been doing allot of reading just to confirm what I always thought beep down about council tax and so many other things. So I wont beat about the bush, I’ve been personally serving Stevenage Borough Council with Notices for the last three weeks now and up till this point there’s been no reply, may I say at this point that I have receipts for all, singed, dated and stamped.

Well, I had thought about giving them more time to respond but then you would think three weeks is enough time but "hay" would they do the same for you?
Some of you guys I know have been having some issues about their local councils acknowledging their Notices and referring to them to as letters.
Bearing this in mind i approached this on a different angel by serving them personally. So this morning I marched down there for the last time with the final notice of "Default and Estoppel effective this date the 22nd Octobr 2010." , and do you think they were happy to see me? lol like f**k.

I was met by a very tall and unhealthy looking character clutching a hand full of paper work whit my notices, almost straight away he asked me "how he could me help me with my problem" I told him that "I was here to serve a notice on Stevenage borough council and not to discuss anything with him" at this point he looked confused and asked me if I thought that council tax was illegal so I had to point out to him the difference between legal and lawful , straight way you could see he was just about to explode, I kid you not, he got up and said he wouldn’t except that as a notice and throw it back at me.

I got up and said that he had already and asked him to sing a receipt, but me march off the right hump lol.
Ten mints later he come back still looking pissed off and told me he would singe my receipt for my letters, and I reminded him they were notices, anyway I got him to do exactly what I wonted.

And here is what he singed.

Receipt of Notice




Date of NOTICE Served 22nd October 2010.

Singed on behalf of __________________Name ______________ Date ___________



Hand Delivered By: dominic of the de’layne family,_____________ Date ___________


Witnessed by: rebecca of the kelly family,____________________ Date ___________

PLEASE READ BEFORE SINGING.

I fully understand that this is a Receipt for a NOTICE as dated above, and that I have singed this Receipt of my own free will.

So this is where I am up till now so ill keep you all posted on any other updates.

Thanks to all of you that have helped me you know who you are


This is what he singed for.

dominic: of the del’layne family 22nd October 2010
*******************
*********
******
******
Reference: ************

Notice of Default and Estoppel effective this date the 22nd October 2010.

Dear Sir,

It is unfortunate that you have chosen to avoid responding to the Notices I have sent you (personally delivered, and recorded by your reception, signed, dated and stamped, receipts of which are enclosed)

Due to your dishonour in not responding to my Notices and therefore not answering any of the questions therein to my satisfaction, i.e,

1. A valid bill which conforms to the definition of a bill of exchange according to the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 Chapter 61, Part II, Section 3(1)

2. Detailed and complete accounting relating to Council tax disbursements, including but not limited to Salaries, Pension Schemes, Expense Accounts, Training Courses, EU Contributions and dividends and/or losses from investment accounts for the period 2007 – 2009

3. Proof of an existing, lawful contract or agreement between myself, the man, Dominic: of the de’layne family and STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL signed by both parties.

4. Proof that I, Dominic: of the De’layne family, have a lawful obligation to pay Council Tax.

5. Proof that Council Tax is lawful.

I have no choice but to conclude that a tacit agreement by your acquiescence now exists and that I have no obligation to pay Council Tax.


Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity

By: Dominic: of the del’layne family.

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice – Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted.

[DominicJay]

Dave and thanks,

As to my other notices they where pretty much your work apart from a few embellishments and some facts from D & B and so on.. May I also say that I read through your notices time and time again, reforested them agent Black law and other info and tried to improve them but found them to be pretty much bang on.

So apart from the lats one which was my own work it was very much influenced by you.. So really, Hats off to you my friend.

Im sure they will be more letters for them but ill deal with that when it comes lol

[DominicJay]

And the same gose for you dave.

[DominicJay]

So this is what i found on my door mat when i got back from work today, what a joke "its a photo coppy". After three notices none of which they replyed to. This just shows you how much contempt these people have for everyone.

doc 01.jpg

[traderfluff]

I have made enquires into the corruption called council tax: and these people are adamant you owe them a living via a levy, civil courts are 95% of our jurisdiction so that leaves 5% for others...... how on earth do you think you have a chance when magistrates are the same walk of life "unpaid" lol voluntary servants temporary empowered to put the same walk of life under orders??? the elites must have a great buffet on the stupidity of we the people......Divide and conquer!!

The battle of paperwork has to stop at some point and the battle of humanity has to kick in!!! freedom is not a privilege, its a right and we fight for our rights and reject the benefits of privilege!!!!

They know you don't rise......... just try to win the unworkable game you'll lose!!!

change means change

[DominicJay]

Yes indeed my friend, this is the world of complacency, ignerances self gratification. "Where is the truth and integrity? "
I for one will always question and say NO to this intolerable belief system we live in. Happy days

[DominicJay]

My response.

Notice of Default and of Estoppel by Acquiescence

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT


Dear Ian of the family Wilson,

May I thank you for acknowledging my Notices and their legal standing as singed by you on behalf of Stevenage Borough Council.

On the 8th of October 2010 15.30pm, I served a Notice on Stevenage Borough Council offering conditional agreement upon the answers to my reasonable questions therein. Said Notice gave you seven days to reply. No response.

On the 15th of October 2010 12.01pm I served Notice of Default and opportunity to cure, once again I gave you seven days to respond and you failed to do so.

On the 22nd October 2010 I served you a Notice of Default and Estoppel regarding your non-compliance to said Notices served.

At this point you are in dishonour of said Notices and I must advise you that a default judgment of permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence is now in place, establishing a legally binding agreement between MR DOMINIC JAY DE’LAYNE and Stevenage Borough Council.

Your summons for non-payment of council tax received on the 25th of October 2010 was merely an offer to contract with the corporation known as Stevenage Borough Council and as such no obligation exists to accept this offer, furthermore it states on your summons / contract and I quote,

“Complaint has this day been made to me the undersigned on behalf of Stevenage Borough council that you, being the person liable to pay council tax as specified bellow have not paid the sum due”
this would imply that the signature singed by the “clerk to the justices” is the person that issued the summons / contract., but on close inspection this is a copy of a signature, and a poor one at that.

The so called “Clerk of the Justices” who ever He or She may be also states that “You are hereby summoned to appear before the magistrates” but according to Holly in “pre court” who thoroughly look though the diary states that “there is no record of DOMINIC JAY DE’LAYNE to appear” on said date, this makes this so called summons spurious.



TAKE NOTE

The human being, dominic of the de’layne family is a third party that dose not represent the capitalised name on the Birth Certificate and falls under common law jurisdiction. MR DOMINIC JAY DE’LAYNE the person, is a legal fiction and falls under “statutory law” also referred to as “The Law of the sea” or “commercial Law”

QUOTE: Statutory law can only be given the force of law by the consent of the governed. For your information please refer to “Black’s Law Dictionary” or your legal department.

The human being, dominic of the de’layne family, dose not consent or stand under any “statutory laws” or any other referred to as.

You have not been charged for this notice, however, any further unsolicited contact attempts relating to this matter by Stevenage Borough Council or any others associated with this corporation will be classed as harassment and charged according to a fee schedule dated from this day forth, 28th October 2010, Notice of Default and of Estoppel by Acquiescence.


Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity


By: dominic: of the de’layne family
All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice – Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted

No reply up till now but i dont think they will as i thihk i realy pissed them off

[arten]

Great stuff Dom and you are in JH's neck of the woods so maybe he will give you some first hand guidance. Here is my advice make sure all your notices are proof read first, a spell checker won't pick up singed when you mean signed. Now if you made the council wallers laugh all power to you. However, I believe reasonable spelling and grammar goes a long way in their make believe world.

[DominicJay]

Hi,
I will keep a check on the spelling as you said, and thanks

[DominicJay]

OK everyone this is my follow up, Noitce to MP and Letter to Lord Ashbourne.

Dominic of the del’layne family 2nd November 2010
xxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Stephen of the family McPartland,
Stevenage
Herts
xxxxxxxx


It is with the utmost importance that you respond to this Notice in substance and with respect of my inalienable and lawful rights under the common law of this land.

Please take note:

A notice is “the legal concept describing a requirement that a party be aware of legal process affecting their rights, obligations or duties”.

On the 8th of october 2010 I gave notice and offered conditional agreement to Stevenage Borough Council regarding payment of council tax, said conditions were:

1. A valid bill which conforms to the definition of a bill of exchange according to the Bills of Exchange Act 1882 Chapter 61, Part II, Section 3(1)

2. Detailed and complete accounting relating to Council tax disbursements, including but not limited to Salaries, Pension Schemes, Expense Accounts, Training Courses, EU Contributions and dividends and/or losses from investment accounts for the period 2007 – 2009

3. Proof of an existing, lawful contract or agreement between myself, the man, dominic: of the de’layne family and STEVENAGE BOROUGH COUNCIL signed by both parties.

4. Proof that I, dominic: of the De’layne family, have a lawful obligation to pay Council Tax.

5. Proof that Council Tax is lawful.

No reply to this Notice was received.

On the 15th of October 2010 I gave Notice to Stevenage Borough Council,
“Default and Opportunity to Cure”. Once again there was no response.

On the 22nd of October 2010 I once again gave Notice to Stevenage Borough Council
“Default and Estoppel” no response.

There has been no attempt by Stevenage Borough Council to reply to any of my Notices and give answers to any of my reasonable questions therein. At this point they are in dishonour and I have advised them that a “default judgment of permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence is now in place, establishing a legally binding agreement between MR DOMINIC JAY DE’LAYNE and Stevenage Borough Council.

As a conditional offer has been made to Stevenage Borough Council and they have not produced evidence that their claim is made lawfully, in the absence of such evidence, I may assert that breaches of treaty obligations between The Crown and the people and the activation of the procedure specified by Ch. 61 of Magna Carta 1215, and there fore I am withholding any said payments.

Authority of The Queen (and Her officials) to issue demands for taxes at a time when she is under the supervision of a Barons Committee lawfully constituted under Ch. 61 of Magna Carta 1215. If the demand was made in the name of a Corporation and not The Queen then I have no contract with the corporation known as Stevenage Borough Council and therefore we the people of this land are under no obligation to pay council tax.

Chapter 61 of Magna Carta covers the subject’s right to appeal to a committee of 25 Barons for redress against a tyrant. After several hundred thousand individuals sent postcards to The Queen in 1999 urging her not to agree to the Nice Treaty, 65 Peers selected a quorum of 25 of their number to form such a committee. They were satisfied that the conditions required to justify the use of the procedure specified in Ch. 61 of Magna Carta 1215 were established.

Four of their number served the petition on Her Majesty on 7th February 2001 insisting that she should:

withhold the Royal Assent from any Parliamentary Bill which attempts to ratify the Treaty of Nice unless and until the people of the UK have given clear and specific approval;

uphold and preserve the rights, freedoms and customs of your loyal subjects as set out in Magna Carta and the Declaration of Right, which you, our Sovereign, swore before the nation to uphold and preserve in your Coronation Oath of June 1953.

These things she has conspicuously failed to do. The service of the Barons Petition was reported in the Daily Telegraph on the 7th February 2001.
Quote: Lord Ashbourne, a Conservative hereditary peer under Tony Blair's reforms, said: "These rights may not have been exercised for 300 years but only because they were not needed. Well, we need them now. They may be a little dusty but they are in good order."
As a consequence of her failure to comply, all loyal subjects are required to “ together with the community of the whole realm, distrain and distress us in all possible ways, namely, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, and in any other way they can, until redress has been obtained as they deem fit.

Magna Carta was, of course, a peace treaty not a statute. Breaches of a treaty give the aggrieved party the right of redress.

The fact that “the whole community of The Realm” is expected to support the Barons Committee means that individual officials have no authority to issue tax demands in the name of The Queen and commit the statutory offence of “fraud by misrepresentation” if they try.
The Courts have no authority to deny the subjects rights either. Representatives of The Crown may not breach the common law maxim that “no man may sit in judgment of his own cause”.

It is for the Barons Committee to let us know when they are satisfied that redress has been obtained. The Barons Committee procedure is based on the Common Law right to claim the protection of “duress of circumstances”. He, or she, may commit a minor crime to prevent a worse one happening. The only limitations on this defence are that it does not justify treason or murder and it does not protect the individual
who voluntarily placed himself under duress or continues to commit minor offences when it is no longer necessary. Transferring allegiance is not treason because oaths of allegiance are sworn to the office, not its holder.

I am a reasonable man that respects the laws and traditions of this good land, but I find it unexceptable when I see it slowly and systemically being ripped apart from the inside by treacherous people.

Take Note.

On the 20th September 2010 an Affidavit was sent to My Sovereign Lady Elizabeth the Queen and was witnessed before a solicitor at “HillersHRW” Stevenage.

On the 28th October 2010 a second Affidavit was sent to Her Majesty The Queen, this was also witnessed before a solicitor at “HillersHRW” Stevenage.

As you are one of the elected representative of this Government and of Stevenage Borough,

I dominic of the de’layne family hereby state:

under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, it is my lawful and god given right to enter into Lawful Rebellian againts the powers that seek to deceive and commit unlawful acts upon this land and its people.

I have removed myself from all and any Allegiance to Elizabeth the Queen, and any such unlawful statutory demands.

The human being, dominic of the de’layne family is a third party that does not represent the capitalised name on the Birth Certificate and falls under common law jurisdiction. MR DOMINIC JAY DE’LAYNE “the person”, is a legal fiction and falls under “statutory law” also referred to as “The Law of the sea”

QUOTE: Statutory law can only be given the force of law by the consent of the governed. For your information please refer to “Blacks Law 3rd edition” or your legal department.

The human being, dominic of the de’layne family does not give consent to this statute and therefore it does not have the force of law upon me.

Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity
By: dominic: of the de’layne family

All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice – Without Recourse - Non-Assumpsit
Errors & Omissions Excepted
Please respond to this Notice with in seven days.

Dominic of the del’layne family 3nd November 2010

Stevenage
Herts

Email: xxxxxxxxxxxx.com Tel:xxxxxxxxx..xxxxxxxxxx







lord Ashbourne,

I am sure you aware of the growing amount of people in this country that are unlawfully subjugated under statutory demands, in this case council tax. There seems to be no recourse for the stoic people of this land in the subject attached to this letter, so it is with the most greatest respect that I ask you for clarification and if possible your intervention in this matter.

The Notice attached has been sent to my local MP (Stephen McPartland) as of today. It clearly shows in my opinion the contempt that local councils have regarding their so called powers when serving summonses on people with” Her Majesty’s “seal on them thus implying that they are issued directly from the court.

Their ignorance regarding lawful procedure in this matter is contemptible to say the least. I am not a well-educated man but I do know the difference between law and lawful .The hypocrisy of theses so called councils have adopted a seemingly unapproachable attitude, as this is undoubtedly the indoctrinated policy that has shaped their procedures.

On a more personal note, though it pains me to say, I have removed myself from all and any Allegiance to Elizabeth the Queen, and any such unlawful statutory demands as have so many other people in this county.

I hope that this great nation of ours will find its way back into the hearts of the good people of this land.




Kind Regards: