THE LAWS PROHIBITING WAR

[antieu]

http://www.makewarshistory.org.uk/mwh/files/the_laws_prohibiting_war.doc

Tony Blair is a WAR CRIMINAL!!

[dave]

It is human nature to compensate for an unnacceptable reality by adopting the dream be it a holiday, a pause between tax bills (in all guises) or whatever. The brotherhood that manipulates events on the world stage studies human (their prey) nature in order to control it, presenting people with the illusion many think of as news, change, daily life, religion or tomorrow.

Sometimes things have to get worse to get better, there is a point where people realise reality as it is must be confronted and resolved. The murders going on around the world now whether under the crown, the UN's nato or other private contractors is self evidentally an ultimate crime against humanity and it cannot be legitimised, only hidden from view or explained using fakery like 'colateral damage', 'insurgents' and 'terrorism'. It is all terrorism, piracy and treason.

Such are the pyramids of power that have been constructed most if not all are a party to it to varying degrees though the world works best if we all have a duty of care to all, the most important person in the world the one that most needs help and no matter how much goodness floods your heart the predators of power are out to break them all and unimpeded will attempt just that.

[catmar]

yes and the criminal Blair is at present I believe touring around the USA doing lectures, maybe we should tell we are change and they can confront him everywhere he shows his snoot~!

[david_grothier]

Of course Blair is a monster and a war criminal, one of the worst kind.

Dont see anyone moving to arrest him though.

In fact he got quite a nice life in good old Blighty, you know where that is of course, that's place that Blair has induced terrorists to attack.

[dave]

yes and the criminal Blair is at present I believe touring around the USA
I don't follow the media to be up on such things but it seems to be a common trait for UK prime ministers and it is perhaps a means by which payments can be made courtesy of the US taxpayers as remuneration for services rendered. In the case of Tony Blair I understand as well as JP Morgan, it was previously suggested in the media that Microsoft and Murdoch were providing a payback for services rendered.

[frank verismo]

http://www.makewarshistory.org.uk/mwh/files/the_laws_prohibiting_war.doc

Tony Blair is a WAR CRIMINAL!!

Of course he is a war criminal, clearly satisfying all the main criteria for such. So why is he allowed to go scot free?

The police and the courts swear an oath to the Crown - and the Crown is ultimately Blair's master and protector.

Protection is only removed from those who stray from the script, and TB has done anything but.

He is, however, almost universally reviled by anyone with a functioning conscience and should not be allowed to show his face in public for the rest of his wretched days without being loudly reminded of this fact.

It was a great pleasure to be part of the crowd so rudely and loudly spoiling his nauseating 'faith and globalisation' speech at Westminster Abbey earlier this year. I sincerely hope it becomes a tradition wherever he attempts to show his miserable and treacherous face.

[catmar]

Perhaps nothing has happened because there are some very bent coppers in high places who are making sure that no investigations take place, although apparently an investigation is under way, what's the betting nothing is handed to the CPS, and if documents are sent to them the answer will come back as go home nothing going on here!

[frank verismo]

Perhaps nothing has happened because there are some very bent coppers in high places who are making sure that no investigations take place, although apparently an investigation is under way, what's the betting nothing is handed to the CPS, and if documents are sent to them the answer will come back as go home nothing going on here!

The image below tells us most of what we need to know regarding the lack of interest in prosecuting certain prominent criminals. A little decoding and we have our answers:


The 'checkerboard' design is not merely decoration. It is the sacred and profane of freemasonry, a fraternity of which nearly all high-level police are members. Notice also it forms a band around the temples. The crown will, no doubt, not have escaped our notice either. Oaths of loyalty are sworn to both, effectively capturing the machinery of the law. It does not belong to the people - hence no justice for the people.


Conspiracies against the people rely on darkness and secrecy to survive. Spread this information far and wide. Shine the brightest light you can on these issues. Historically, it has always been the light of exposure that has broken the stranglehold.

[david_grothier]

SENT TO MARK LYNCH SUPT HEAD OF INTELLIGENCE SOUTH WALES POLICE----I JUST KEEP CHIPPING AWAY-THEY FAILED TO INVESTIGATE THE CORRUPTION OF DYFED POWYS POLICE FORCE AND HERE IS THEIR REASONING FOLLOWED MY MY REPLY(NEVER DID RING)

Dear David,

I have liaised as stated with the SWP Professional Standards Department and forwarded them your complaints in respect of Dyfed Powys Police Force. Your complaints have in turn been forwarded to the DPPF Professional Standards Department.

I have received further advice to the effect that :

SWP cannot be appointed to investigate another force unless directed by the IPCC, and this is only done in extreme cases. The process to be followed is as below :

1. Complaints will be subject of recording decision by Dyfed Powys

2. If you are unhappy with the recording decision then you can appeal to the IPCC (You will be told this when contacted by DPP who should forward details explaining the process)

3. If you are subsequently unhappy with the IPCC then you have recourse to seek legal advice from a solicitor and seek a Judicial Review into their role/decisions.

Including SWP in the loop is contrary to procedures.

Contact details for the IPCC are below

Telephone 08453 002 002

E mail enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Independent Police Complaints Commission
Eastern Business Park
Wern Fawr Lane
St Mellons
Cardiff

CF35 5EA
I will ring to discuss this evening.
Regards,

Mark Lynch.
Detective Superintendent
Director of Intelligence.



Internal - 20 402
DDI - 01656 303471
Mobile - 07790 630332
E Mail - mark.lynch@south-wales.pnn.police.uk


From: David Grothier <daviddegrothier1@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Follow up
To: Mark.Lynch@south-wales.pnn.police.uk
Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008, 4:09 PM

Hello Mark I trust you are well.

I guess it was inevitable that we would eventual clash, you being part of a hopelessly corrupt system which is regrettable, from my point of view.

I am current studying the most effective way to bring South Wales Police to justice for a failure of duty under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 which specifically cover the indictable offences that ARE REGARDED AS COMMITTED through an or an omission.

I have found that the same rules apply to the prosecution of Police Officers as with any other person. I believe that I have provided sufficient admissible evidence to justify commencing proceedings. On the question of sufficiency this includes the normal requirement which is that there must be "corroboration", that is evidence from at least two separate sources to establish the essential facts of the case which are the commission of a crime and the identity of the perpetrator. In addition such evidence as there is must be admissible and reliable and prosecution must be in the public interest which I believe it to be.

Furthermore there is an Appeal Court decision of which I am sure you must be aware in which the appellant who was on duty took no steps to etc etc ..... HE WAS CHARGED in an indictment with misconduct whilst acting as an officer of justice in that he deliberately failed to carry out his duty...... by wilfully omitting to take any steps to........ bring to justice....... At the trial he objected to the indictment on the grounds that it did not disclose an offence known to the law. The trial judge ruled against the objection and the trial proceeded. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the appellant was convicted. He appealed against the conviction on the ground that the trial judge erred in ruling that the indictment disclosed an offence known to law. The appellant conceded that at common law there existed an offence of misconduct in public office, but contended that mere nonfeasance by a person in the discharge of his duty as the holder of a public office was insufficient to constitute the offence and there had to be a malfeasance or, at least, a misfeasance involving corruption or fraud."

The Court of Appeal HELD:

"A public officer who wilfully and without reasonable excuse or justification neglected to perform any duty he was bound to perform by common law or statute was indictable for the common law offence of misconduct in public office. The element of culpability required was not restricted to corruption or dishonesty, although it had to be such that the conduct impugned was calculated to injure the public interest and called for punishment. Whether there was such conduct was a matter for the jury on the evidence. Since the indictment alleged deliberate and wilful neglect by the appellant to perform his duty...... it disclosed an offence of misconduct in public office. It followed that the judge's ruling had been correct and that the appeal would be dismissed".


On another occasion, Sir Anthony Clarke, the Master of the Rolls, said the duty of the police to protect was "not an onerous one"; and nor was he persuaded that the court's ruling would "threaten police resources" or "open the floodgates to baseless claims against the police".
"They should have done everything that could reasonably have been expected of them," added the judge.

The above is just a rough outline and to give you notice of my intention. It would be inconceivable in the name of justice and all children that coroners such as Morgan are allowed to escape justice, as it would be for perjuring doctors, also corrupt police such as DPPF who find protection from an equally corrupt IPPC.

It can never be said that each and all we given a fair and equitable opportunity to behave as decent citizens each doing their legal and natural duties,

Sincerely with best wishes David.