The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Understanding and the use of our Common Law.
Forum rules
The articles and opinions written on this website , might not reflect the views of the site, We do not give legal advice and in no way are we responsible for what is written by our members

The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby HannibaltheHerbivore » Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:05 am

The Informer - Part 1 (1 of 7) - The Common Law was the most hated law by the common man in England (10mins 45s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIvHu8-5few



The Informer - Part 1 (2/7) - admiralty law, US v Bevans + US constitution NOT for the common man (9mins 36s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyiNJghRg3k



The Informer Part 1 (3/7): the US CONstitution + The Crown is The Templar Church, NOT the monarchy (8mins 48s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_ZWKeWy_nM



The Informer - Part 1 (4 of 7) - The Vatican and why the Magna Carta can be considered cr*p (duress) (9mins 25s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66Gh0vg3NKw



The Informer Part 1 (5/7) - The Crown, The First Bank of the US, the Federal Reserve, the Vatican (8mins 4s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jj3-vdHn6Vc



The Informer Part 1 (6/7) - "the big boys", BIS, I.G. Farben protected during WW2, Rockefeller & oil (8mins 20s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BY9DLCMGss



The Informer Part 1 (7/7) - the U.S. government knew about the attack on Pearl Harbour in advance (6mins 55s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjoHnhkxkxw



---

The Informer Part 2 (1/6): Common Law + A Plantation Is A Business, Not A Farm (10mins 58s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWig8vJzoQ0



The Informer Pt 2 (2/6): Black's Law Dictionary + King George III Kept His Colonies In 1783 Treaty (9mins 59s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGS_92kfaUI



The Informer Pt 2 (3/6): The King Dictated 1783 Treaty + William The Conqueror Took The Land (1066) (10mins 59s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8yU3PinNIk



The Informer Pt 2 (4/6) - The US Constitution Didn't Allow Banks, And How Washington Got Round That (10mins 44s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs4QmjX1S3w



The Informer Pt 2 (5/6): Marshall Ruled For The Banks + District Courts + The Crown + 14th Amendment (11mins)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avpv9122qM4



Informer Pt 2 (6/6): Federal Reserve Notes + Attorneys + Maritime + Constitution Destroyed In 1791 (10mins 47s)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGx_MXpmL3c




http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm (account now suspended)

The Informer is by profession a researcher of 40 years and worked for major 500 companies. He started the legal research into government as a whole in 1979 and went heavy into the taxation part, all phases, in 1981, and continues to this day. He is retired and uses his cognitive skills of 40 years to continue studying. His history research came about because of the government research that uncovered many inconsistencies in what people perceive to be true about government, but which is not. His inquiries and study led him to other historical researchers nationwide. These findings show governments are run by people other than the common man and woman of America and is not the "representative form" as people believe.

-----

12 old interviews with i-man - the most recent being from December 2008 - can be downloaded from the following links:

327-The Informer Pt 1
http://www.mediafire.com/?zt5lt3wtwky

328-The Informer Pt 2
http://www.mediafire.com/?ia3wdkhzxng

329-The Informer Pt 3
http://www.mediafire.com/?lzynigwtkiw

350-The Informer Pt 4
http://www.mediafire.com/?vjdimmejmzy

351-The Informer Pt 5
http://www.mediafire.com/?ktqmtoudgyh

368-The Informer Pt 6
http://www.mediafire.com/?0zmtjymtomc

538-The Informer on the War Powers Act-Pt1
http://www.mediafire.com/?vziwuyfxoan

540-The Informer on the War Powers Act-Pt2
http://www.mediafire.com/?t3zhnjgmjtk

668-The Informer on Dependence Day
http://www.mediafire.com/?hlgmdtjoyhj

791-How the Informer opted out of the IRS system
http://www.mediafire.com/?a4hdexz2ngu

04-imanknoll
http://www.mediafire.com/?btfeqcz2jty

The Informer Conference - December 20, 2008 (2hrs 29mins - 34MB)
http://www.mediafire.com/?aiztddjm2mn

-----

Vyzygoth/Keith Hanson's more recent shows with various other guests can be downloaded from here:

http://www.thinkorbeeaten.com/theknoll/radio.html
HannibaltheHerbivore
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:49 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby HannibaltheHerbivore » Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:03 pm

Does everybody on this forum really not care enough about this to comment?

If the Magna Carta was void because it was signed under duress, does that really not matter to anyone here?
HannibaltheHerbivore
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:49 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby spinningbackfist » Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:26 am

Small matter :lol: Now Woodrow Wilson,that was a "Fuck Up",was he under "Duress" :lol: or under something else :?
spinningbackfist
 

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby Anglo-Saxon » Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:18 pm

HannibaltheHerbivore wrote:Does everybody on this forum really not care enough about this to comment?

If the Magna Carta was void because it was signed under duress, does that really not matter to anyone here?



I left TPUC for a while because i felt most people were really looking at the wrong picture your post is 100% spot on
hope more people look at this and other posters inc notwattyler, anglo-saxon the problem is the monarchy, tpuc seem to want to focus on the Magna carta the
problem started in 1066 and has grown and still exists in 2010

HannibaltheHerbivore you are already near the finishing line waiting for others to catch up


No doubt come across you again
Last edited by Anglo-Saxon on Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A get rich scheme all part of the Feudal System
http://www.leasehold-outrage.com

Meet the Money changer to Osborne. Sassoon Secretary to the Treasury

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/sassoon.htm

Zionists the story
http://bcove.me/jvdvl0rb
User avatar
Anglo-Saxon
 
Posts: 588
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Lincoln's Inn. William Garrow barrister. Man for the Common people
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby HannibaltheHerbivore » Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:25 pm

Anglo-Saxon wrote:I left TPUC for a while because i felt most people were really looking at the wrong picture

They are, and as usual on such forums there are people actively encouraging them to look at the wrong picture and/or not to look at the bigger picture.


Anglo-Saxon wrote:your post is 100% spot on
hope more people look at this and other posters inc notwattyler, anglo-saxon the problem is the monarchy tpuc seem to want to focus on the Magna carta the
problem started in 1066 and has grown and still exists in 2010

"The problem" started long before 1066, but that was obviously a highly significant era, especially in terms of this land.


Anglo-Saxon wrote:HannibaltheHerbivore you are already near the finishing line waiting for others to catch up

Well that's kind of you to say but I've still got a lot to learn.


Anglo-Saxon wrote:No doubt come across you again

Indeed. All the best.
HannibaltheHerbivore
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:49 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby mrcrisp » Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:43 pm

As I understand it, the Magna Carta 1215 is just another fictional man-made set of rules/law.

Nothing can override the creators law by which all Laws created by man must not breach these laws, no harm injury to anyone, no damage to property and no fraud in your activities.

Any law written down becomes fictional and man-made.
Gods Laws are an internal reference for your moral compass.
I know in my heart that murder, harming someone, damaging property or commiting fraud are wrong. I don't need it written anywhere to know it be truth.

Rob
*I'm not really here and neither are you...
User avatar
mrcrisp
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:07 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby chrissyboy » Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:45 am

Ok just to butt in a little, if Magna Carta was/is crap why then has this happened? to paraphrase - '65 Peers selected a quorum of 25 of their number to address the petitions from the MCS (Magna Carta Society) and members of the public. They were satisfied that the conditions required to justify the use of the procedure specified in Ch. 61 of Magna Carta 1215 were established. Four of their number served the petition on Her Majesty on 7th February 2001.

So, if MC was/is crap then why would the MCS petition the lords? and then also why would the 25 barons act on this? surely they would know if MC was/is crap?

John Hurst, if anyone doesnt know is going to court over non payment of council tax, using lawful rebellion as his defence, this is one blog where you can read of the previous events that happened.


http://pjcjournal.wordpress.com/2010/10 ... statement/
Peace to all freemen and women..Let the revolution begin! 'Che'.
User avatar
chrissyboy
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:00 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby HannibaltheHerbivore » Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:20 pm

chrissyboy wrote:if MC was/is crap then why would the MCS petition the lords? and then also why would the 25 barons act on this? surely they would know if MC was/is crap?

Either a) to continue to pretend that it wasn't signed under duress and thus can't be considered crap, or b) because they themselves don't know what the Informer is saying.

Or some other form of deception.
HannibaltheHerbivore
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 7:49 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Informer - why Magna Carta can be considered crap etc.

Postby chrissyboy » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:50 am

I understand what you are saying but, do you really think that the entire Magna Carta Society who study this contract from Monarch to people really are so dumb as to continue this persuit knowing full well it's futile? and if it really was futile to continue then why would the Highest court in the land (house of lords) uphold their view on this? 65 Barons do not persue something which is in your view Bullshit, and even if it was BS and the highest court in the land upholds it then isnt it law? I dont think there are 65 Barons chuckling to themselves about how they have allowed a redundant piece of paper to influence so many lawful rebels into their course of action, as you know full well the contract of MC1215 is incorporated into the statute books, if duress was indeed part of the signing process then why is it on the statute books? and why has MC1215 created so many of our basic fundamental rights enshrined into law if it was just all BS?, public opinion and the will of the people will always overrule the want of a few, which i believe is why Magna Carta was created in the first place, Divine right (given by a man in a dress who says he speaks to god) to rule people and land taken by the sword is not only illegal, but unlawful too, MC was created to limit the power of those who believe they have absolute right over another man, under duress or not all men are created equal and we are second only to the creator, the monarch was/is illegitimate but believes otherwise, if MC is illegitimate then we can believe otherwise too until like i have said previously the highest court in the land upholds it as LAW.
Peace to all freemen and women..Let the revolution begin! 'Che'.
User avatar
chrissyboy
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:00 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time


Return to Common Law

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest