Halsburys Laws of England Books

[northeastgadgy]

Hi I was given these books (about ten) just for ornamental use to fill a bookshelf along with a solicitors Dictionary are they of any use to me they a books full of legal jargon and `m not sure if of any real use

[Chug]

No they are rubbish, you'd best let me take them off your hands.

love n harmony in the community
Chug
Enemy of the state

[startfresh]

give them chug can i pik them up and take them saturday freshy

[northeastgadgy]

Following is a list of the books I have and in my possession I would really like some advice on how to use/study them as it seems awkward to me to find a particular subject on looking at them it’s not like looking at a the back of a book for a subject and it tells you what page it’s on maybe I`m a numpty I just find them confusing, I have heard of Black's Law Dictionary would I be better off flogging these and buying that book to read up on laws? Any advice appreciated.

1979 Solicitor`s Diary & dictionary
Halsbury`s Laws of England fourth Edition 1981 Volumes 1-26,28-32 Third edition supplement table( 1 book)
Halsbury`s Laws of England fourth Edition 1983 parts 1&2 (2 books)
Halsbury`s Laws of England fourth Edition1984 parts 1&2 (2 books)
Halsbury`s Laws of England fourth Edition1985 parts 1&2 (2 books)
Halsbury`s Laws of England fourth Edition1986 parts 1&2 (2 books)
10 books in total all brown hardbacks gold lettering published by Butterworth’s

Cheers Lorry

[enegiss]

try this for info, it certainly looks promising, it is from a post by musashi on fmotl.com

“It is my understanding from Halsbury’s Laws of England that the Oath does not authorize any Judge or Magistrate in the Common Law Jurisdiction of England and Wales to adjudicate any Hearing in which the matter is to be decided in any way other than by a Jury. Furthermore, in the Hearing in question held at the Magistrates Court in TOWN on DATE there was no Injured Party, no corpus delecti, and no Defendant. Therefore the Common Law Oath under which the Judge/Magistrate claimed authority is unlawful and constitutes an offence contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835. The fact that the Judge/Magistrate sat is considered to be prima facie evidence of the offence.

It is my understanding from reading Halsbury’s Laws of England that no MAGISTRATES or COUNTY COURT should exist, and when someone is summoned it is an ADMINISTRATIVE meeting without ANY lawful existence. If this has transpired it is in breach of the Fraud Act 2006 (see 4, 5 and 6 below) as the Judge/Magistrate, Clerk and Prosecutor step outside their lawful remit, and become personally liable.

It is my understanding that demanding monies by false representation is in breach of the Fraud Act 2006, Section 2

It is my understanding that demanding monies without providing full disclosure is in breach of The Fraud Act 2006, Section 3


It is my understanding that demanding monies without providing evidence of authority or jurisdiction is in breach of The Fraud Act 2006, Section 4

It is my understanding that Halsbury’s on Administrative Law 20-11: “The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is no authority for administrative courts in this country and no act can be passed to legitimise them.”

It is my understanding that according to Observance of due Process of Law 1368 section 3: “None shall be put to answer without due Process of Law.
At the Request of the Commons by their Petitions put forth in this Parliament, to eschew the Mischiefs and Damages done to divers of his Commons by false Accusers, which oftentimes have made their Accusations more for Revenge and singular Benefit, than for the Profit of the King, or of his People, which accused Persons, some have been taken, and sometime caused to come before the King’s Council by Writ, and otherwise upon grievous Pain against the Law: It is assented and accorded, for the good Governance of the Commons, that no Man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices, or Matter of Record, or by due Process and Writ original, according to the old Law of the Land: And if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error.”

[enegiss]

there is also this aspect of halsbury usage http://www.courtofrecord.org.uk/gicor/r ... -10-10.pdf

[northeastgadgy]

I just want to know how to find things in the books there seems no obvious reference to find anything in particular in the books, its not like you just go to the back pages and look up laws on any given subject or is there a reference book missing that would tell you which volume to go to and what page.

[enegiss]

could be someone may be able to help you on the fmotl.com or the fmotl.co.uk sites, i personally do not know myself soz,

[Matt Speake]

are u selling the books let me know!

[northeastgadgy]

Pm sent