A4e fraud scandle

[madlookin]

this emma harrison is reported to have paid herself a dividend of £8,000,000 of summink like that....and they blame people with bad backs and an extra bedroom...feckin joke

http://thecomingcrisis.blogspot.com/201 ... y-a4e.html

google....
emma harrison a4e corruption

[Johnofwrong]

the fact is a4e was and is a private company,.that Emma Harrison started with her own money and built it up from nothing imo she can pay herself as much as she wants . also a4e reported the fraud to the police . im not sicking up for them but facts are facts and the msm won't tell you them all

[madlookin]

the fact is a4e was and is a private company,.that Emma Harrison started with her own money and built it up from nothing imo she can pay herself as much as she wants . also a4e reported the fraud to the police . im not sicking up for them but facts are facts and the msm won't tell you them all

i just caught it on the news and thought i'd put it up....personally i've never liked the concept of employment agency's...but thats another tin of worms

[notguilty]

the fact is a4e was and is a private company,.that Emma Harrison started with her own money and built it up from nothing imo she can pay herself as much as she wants . also a4e reported the fraud to the police . im not sicking up for them but facts are facts and the msm won't tell you them all

Facts ? And you can confirm these facts how ?

What has she built up exactly ? On the backs of who ? Using the money of whom ?
A private company extrapolating funds from the public purse to perpetuate the modern workhouse ideology. Next thing . . . . you'll suggest she deserves a bonus right !
Many of the banks are private institutions also, and look what they have done and look who has footed the bill !

Yes A4e

[Johnofwrong]

@notguilty firstly I'm not quiet sure why you feel its ok to have a pop at people for posting something you may not agree with. the facts are in the public domain and easily available from the net if you can be bothered to look!! secondly from what i can make out from your post your, saying that if you own a company and have a government contract you then no longer own the company because the money comes from the public ? and therefore any company including say a window cleaner who has a government contract is not able to give himself a payout of x amount becaue the money comes from the public.? and also can you explain what you mean by modern work house ideology?