Does this stuff ever actually work for so-called violators?

[Just_Wondering]

Hi, I'm new here.

It's GREAT to know / flex your rights, of course. As a member of any society, it's important to know how best to stand up against bullying, intimidation and harassment, ESPECIALLY from people who claim to be authorities.

Knowing the Common Law / Civil Law distinction seems to be very effective in a harassment-preventative context. However, having scoured the youtubery, I observe very little adherence to it from the police when they consider a law (inc. acts & statutes) has actually been violated.

Twenty minutes of abstract cross-talking usually leads to an arrest, and the filmer gives his/her opinion about the corruption of the state blah blah blah.

There are plenty of videos which show how to get the police to leave you alone when you aren't really doing anything and they just want to control you. Again, this is GREAT.

But, I've never seen this Common Law / Freeman distinction actually stop any law enforcement from taking control of a situation where they consider the law has been violated.

Am I right? Am I wrong?

Can we get a highlight reel going in this thread?

[bodge]

Your "Rights" are whatever the policy man dealing with you deams them to be no matter how wrong he is, he will "enforce" his will over yours because you are not a policy man and therefore in their limited mentality anyone not bearing their uniform is guilty of "something" yes, yes I know there are some decent coppers out there and I have yet to meet more than a couple of them but the majority will consider YOU "guilty of something" until cleared. Do these things work in court? YES "IF" you get put in front of someone who isnt up his own arse. I was in front a maj for headbutting my wifes boyfriend and this "maj" was a total asswipe, totally REFUSED to take the mitigating circumstances into consideration. "I AM THE LAW" so sayeth Judge Dread then cocks his enormous gun and blows you away in megacity 1. We are slowly drifting into a world of total control laws and dictatorial powers where the PTB will decide for themselves wther or not you should be guilty of something, the law be dammed, THEY are the law and they are going to screw everything that moves because they can but it wont last and then when the insurrection is over they will be found hanging from street lights all over the country.

Sorry! what was your question again, oh yes: does this stuff actually work. "SOMETIMES" it depends how far up his own ass the judge of the situation is

[Jayen4]

Yes and that is what's known as Bodge ''Going off on one'' ! . But in reality,he IS correct. This so called 'Law' is treated as so flexible by the 'ptb' that you would be forgiven for thinking that it's made of plasticene (sp?). Totally corrupt,the lot of them ! (And that's ME going off on one ! ).
* That bloody Bodge is infectious !

[Just_Wondering]

Well, if the system truly is that corrupt, it doesn't really work then.

[madlookin]

firstly...welcome to the forum....and its good not to jump in....and good to ask questions....so heres my 2p worth...

Well, if the system truly is that corrupt, it doesn't really work then.

that sounds like playing a game of chess with an oponant who plays by there own rules.....doesn't mean the game is bad....but it would be right to say..."Hold on!,your not playing fairly!".....if they ignore you....should we carry on playing?

it depends on what you/we consider as winning.....some cases quietly get dropped of renamed....some folks get out of paying a FPN....or manage to politely tell the TV licensing man that they're not paying to be brainwashed.....some people make things a whole lot worse and would be better to keep there mouths shut....i think,all our dealings in life are lessons...and we should say "NO" if another is wrongly imposing intimidation onto us....it all depends how we say it

you may have seen this vid....on the day it was a win.....but the so-called authorities came back like wolves in the night

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpUjl4LvQM8

would you consider the above vid a failure?

regards
mad

[Just_Wondering]

Well the judicial wheels kept turning and as you say the authorities came back.

So, taken as a whole I'd call this episode a failure. Would you?

[Jayen4]

Well the judicial wheels kept turning and as you say the authorities came back.

So, taken as a whole I'd call this episode a failure. Would you?

Well,no....I wouldn't say that episode was a 'failure'.... The people behind the gate were correct. That's why the 'sherrif' or whatever the hell he was,went away at the time. But as ever,these 'thieves' are sore losers,so they came back again at a later time,when they knew there'd be no opposition waiting for them ! That's the sort of lowlife scum that they are ! That 'sherrif' looks like a devious bastard anyway.
Ben and co should have kept the house under guard and been expecting them to try an underhand trick like that.

There is of course one surefire way to get rid off these leeches......but you wouldn't want me to tell you what that was on the open forum ! (There are clues right there in that sentence!).

[madlookin]

Well the judicial wheels kept turning and as you say the authorities came back.

So, taken as a whole I'd call this episode a failure. Would you?

so....when you played your first game of chess.....and most likely lost.....did you never bother playing again?....are you suggesting people should just give up on a "truth" that resonates in...there/our.....heart?

[Just_Wondering]

Nope.

Just wondering what illegal activity people really get away with by denying the authority of law.

It looks to me like not much.

My chess game's pretty solid... I don't see the analogy between chess and the social contract though.

[madlookin]

Nope.

Just wondering what illegal activity people really get away with by denying the authority of law.

It looks to me like not much.

My chess game's pretty solid... I don't see the analogy between chess and the social contract though.

looks to me like your all sorted....no need to "wonder" anymore