Just wondering what illegal activity people really get away with by denying the authority of law.
It looks to me like not much.
My chess game's pretty solid... I don't see the analogy between chess and the social contract though.
LOL @ Social Contract. There's no such thing. It's a post-facto attempt to justify the state of affairs which exist without anyone's agreement, other than the agreement of the house of wessex/cromwell/occupation forces in Iraq/etc agreeing not to kill people who dont piss them off too much. Thats right, the so called social contract is an attempt to make the continuing rape and pillage of your rights look legitimate and just but show me the signatures, the evidence of the contact, the consideration, anything at all other than the fact that people are complying with whatever demands placed upon them by those with biggest guns. People comply with bank robbers and this is no different except that the bank robber would not have the audacity to say that his victims had somehow contracted to have their rights suspended, infringed and set aside because they didn't struggle with a man with a loaded gun.
While theres no doubt that there are people who will say they consent to this monopoly of force, take the gun out the room and you will soon see exactly who consents to live under tyranny from the safety of not being threatened with a tyrant.
There is no social contract, there is simply do what your told or be attacked, although there are other paths that can be taken that the brutal oligarchs, the plundering parasites, the victorious vanquishers, the bastards are completely in the dark about, and we the free and peaceful like it this way.