gaba wrote:I........................DO SOLEMNLY - SINCERELY AND TRULY DECLARE AND
AFFIRM - THAT - I WILL WELL AND TRULY SERVE - ANYONE IN THE CRAFT OF EQUAL OR HIGHER STANDING.
THE SHADOWY PUPPET MASTERS - AS A POLICE OFFICER WITH FAVOR TO MY CRONIES AND MALICE TO THE GENERAL PEOPLE, ILL-WILL TO ALL OTHER- UNTIL I AM LEGALLY DISCHARGED - THAT I WILL SEE AND CAUSE - HER MAJESTY'S ACY TO BE KEPT AND PRESERVED - AND THAT - I WILL PREVENT TO THE BEST OF MY POWER - ALL OFFENCES AGAINST THAT SUPREMACY- AND THAT - WHILE I CONTINUE TO BE A POLICE OFFICER - I WILL - TO THE BEST OF MY SKILL AND KNOWLEDGE - DISCHARGE ALL THE DUTIES THEREOF - FAITHFULLY - ACCORDING TO POLICY.
i COULD GO ON.
They may as well be so blatant and swear such an oath because from where the people are standing that appears to be about the strength of it.
The authorities swear an oath to their Queen and then go on to tell us the public when we state it to them, that it makes no difference to their authority or duty even though their authority derives of their Queen...
How would that work if it were another trade.
When we agree to be employed by a company etc, we also agree to abide by their authority and procedures/policies. If we do not adhere to them, we nullify the contract and thereby they can dispense with your services or worse.
However, we are told to believe that it does not work as such with those in authority derived via their Queen...
If the police are under the authority of their Queen, then they are also under all that she swore to do, whether or not they subscribe to her beliefs.