acceptance for value works

[freemenorthants]

i do wnat i wnat do pester someone elesce i will not sure to like of you whos pu thoer opwn asss, i do my own fcts i share to real livins souls are realy learning how blacks law works and i word my privtw letter to such i will do what i did each time for all unlawful depamneds of payment. use your bound account. once you comsemt they taek of from the bound account, get it now?

[freemenorthants]

your such as as, nose to the ground yes,,,,,,,,, very clear facts, i will not handon to plalte tokk me ages to learn, do do some your own digging and waste time trying to diss someone manage to find what work, you must to sad to use pubilc site to try your mind games, i still to my facts that DO WORK

[SbutC]

Freemenorthants,

You still haven't told us what this was connected to, or how much it was. Based on those last two posts though, I think you've revealed a more plausible reason for why you had your "success":

Bamboozle the creditor with a "privtw letter" full of enough gibberish that they just have no idea how to respond. Make sure you "do your owpn facts", "still to the facts" and I'm sure the "depamned of payment" will go away.

SbutC

[Geronimo]

I suppose there might be people here who would be convinced by very little (or actually in this case, zero) evidence, so if it's that important to you I'll amend my original statement to:

"No, it doesn't work, and you haven't offered anything at all in the way of evidence that might convince a rational reader otherwise".

Happier?

Still doesn't distract from the original impression you were trying to give that WE ALL agreed with you and to re-issue it calling into doubt the rationality of those who might be convinced by the OP does seem to say more about you and your membership than you perhaps might like...at this time.

BTW, it would seem that although you can understand the misspelling that is contained in the thread you have decided to mimic mock this in your last post. This thread is the OP's, would you walk into someones house and mimic mock how they spoke or pronounced words? If not why do you do it on this thread? Are you trying to imply as some post have misspellings that the contents of such posts are worthless? If so why would you do that?

Could i guess? A hobby, a power thang, or perhaps a job?

Can we hope to see a thread by you or will you always be just re-acting and pointing out the errors of spelling and content of others posts?

[frogmanbrabs]

Sorry Freemenorthants but you seem to have a problem typing English so what chance do you have with Legalese?

[SbutC]

Geronimo:

As frogmanbrabs points out, the OP's original claim was that he'd written a letter, supposedly a particularly technical letter, that proved A4V, but his apparent inability to construct basic sentences drastically undermines his claim. As a rule it would indeed be fallacious to claim bad spelling made a post's content worthless, but in this case it's a perfectly valid criticism.

As for "anybody", you need to stop clinging to your initial misinterpretation of what I meant. The impression you took isn't necessarily the impression I was "trying to give". I've clarified my meaning and that should be enough.

My posting here is neither a hobby nor a power trip, and it certainly isn't my job.

You seem to be trying to discredit me in this thread, despite the fact that you've offered nothing to rebut any of the points I've made regarding the actual subject of the thread.

SbutC

[vanilla]

My posting here is neither a hobby nor a power trip, and it certainly isn't my job.

If you're capable of constructing a coherent sentence and thinking rationally, you'll get that a lot.

Some here are under the illusion that the government is so afraid of their daily outpouring of bollocks that they'll employ someone to spy on them. Several people in fact, judging by the accusations that get thrown about.

Forget about seeing any evidence because you won't get any, but you'll be told it's definitely true anyway and that you're the gullible one for blindly accepting the 'mainstream' line. These guys know the real truth, which is that you can get something for nothing and dismiss your creditors using a payment slip and some legal jargon.

[Geronimo]

Geronimo:

As frogmanbrabs points out, the OP's original claim was that he'd written a letter, Yes he claims that, do we have proof he hasn't, are we to believe he lied until he proves otherwise? supposedly a particularly technical letter, that proved A4V, but his apparent inability to construct basic sentences drastically undermines his claim. Why, it doesnt follow, does it? As a rule it would indeed be fallacious to claim bad spelling made a post's content worthless, but in this case it's a perfectly valid criticism. That is of course your opinion and is worth what others think it is worth, perhaps worthless!

As for "anybody", you need to stop clinging to your initial misinterpretation of what I meant. Err, no i dont! The impression you took isn't necessarily the impression I was "trying to give". I've clarified my meaning and that should be enough. Well obviously for you it is, but as someone who comes across as very pedantic im sure you appriecate others being in the same vein

My posting here is neither a hobby nor a power trip, and it certainly isn't my job. Can i then ask what it is?

You seem to be trying to discredit me in this thread, Err, no im just challenging your seemingly determination to undermine the Ops thread, is that so wrong? despite the fact that you've offered nothing to rebut any of the points I've made regarding the actual subject of the thread. I of course dont have to enter into the subject to say what i think of your comments to and about the OP. Its his thread he has the right to post as he feels fit without being conditioned not to post in future for fear of ridicule.

SbutC

[freemenorthants]

when so many are making a living out of this and dvds and talks etc, why shall i just act on your unlawful demads? I never will nor by those closed minded souls whom like to pick on and try to dismiss a real facts of someone able to take small steps, its leaning , about how to use tort law and blacks law, meaning, when require proof of lawful two part signed contract, as in either how one signs ones name also, taking back the control of our living souls, like a helpful links ones on this site, helps many. and its how one is able to learn of the words used, in my area that worked, and still trying for other unlawful demands and bills, and its not simple, its hard work, yet, why your so demanding i privided privte info for free, when others i know are ripping many of for thier yrs of learning, so why you get of your behind to, and do some homework and try your way, see if that works for you? Yet may be you think your above all this, i do belive when i have a few areas and then have all bills demands paid out of our bond account, instead of double charge one for demands , may be draw up templet letter then, well someone likes to play about with ones spelling of words, . i find this very sad, of such a pubilc area to help each other, in fact simple facts of a serivce provider, of high demand of payment, so worked twice this yr, and i still learning blacks law, and yes i saw someon do same as on was on edge media tv , tv, show whom makes lot more on doing what i learing, as one step at a time, have any one really read up on bill of exchange act 1882? , if not worth understanding part of discharge of all demands of bills to,

[SbutC]

Yes he claims that, do we have proof he hasn't, are we to believe he lied until he proves otherwise?

I've already said that I have no issue with believing the fact that he wrote the letter. Twisting my words is a favourite of yours isn't it. I have at no time implied that he lied about anything.

Why, it doesnt follow, does it?

He struggles to write coherant English, so yes, it follows absolutely that he would struggle to write coherant *technical* English. This is called logic, not opinion.

Well obviously for you it is, but as someone who comes across as very pedantic im sure you appriecate others being in the same vein

You're not being pedantic though, because there's nothing left to be pedantic about following your misunderstanding and my clarification. You're merely refusing to give up a point that has no substance.

I of course dont have to enter into the subject to say what i think of your comments to and about the OP. Its his thread he has the right to post as he feels fit without being conditioned not to post in future for fear of ridicule.

He has 300+ posts over 2 years - I have no concerns that this will stop him continuing to post. I'm not disputing his right to post anything he likes, but it's a public forum and anybody (yes, "anybody"!) has the right to challenge his opinion if he *chooses* to supply zero evidence for what he's saying. But we already know from the TV License post that backing up your points isn't a requirement for conversation in Geronimo's world.

SbutC