SbutC wrote:Hi HVYMTL,
I'm not sure what you mean by "betray similarity", and I have no idea who is the "J" you refer to.
I'm broadly in agreement with your last three paragraphs though - as you say, it would have its purposes within the banking world in certain circumstances. I too believe that A4V isn't available to just anybody who provides the right form of words, which makes me justifiably skeptical of the original post's claim.
SbutC wrote:Geronimo wrote:Yes he claims that, do we have proof he hasn't, are we to believe he lied until he proves otherwise?
I've already said that I have no issue with believing the fact that he wrote the letter. Twisting my words is a favourite of yours isn't it. I have at no time implied that he lied about anything.Geronimo wrote:Why, it doesnt follow, does it?
He struggles to write coherant English, so yes, it follows absolutely that he would struggle to write coherant *technical* English. This is called logic, not opinion.Geronimo wrote:Well obviously for you it is, but as someone who comes across as very pedantic im sure you appriecate others being in the same vein
You're not being pedantic though, because there's nothing left to be pedantic about following your misunderstanding and my clarification. You're merely refusing to give up a point that has no substance.Geronimo wrote:I of course dont have to enter into the subject to say what i think of your comments to and about the OP. Its his thread he has the right to post as he feels fit without being conditioned not to post in future for fear of ridicule.
He has 300+ posts over 2 years - I have no concerns that this will stop him continuing to post. I'm not disputing his right to post anything he likes, but it's a public forum and anybody (yes, "anybody"!) has the right to challenge his opinion if he *chooses* to supply zero evidence for what he's saying. But we already know from the TV License post that backing up your points isn't a requirement for conversation in Geronimo's world.
SbutC wrote:You didn't have to back up anything yourself, but twice you rushed to the side of posters who made unsupported assertions that "X happened because of Y", before they'd even had a chance to respond. Hence "Geronimo's world"; where nothing a person says should ever be challenged; where opinion and misunderstanding are encouraged to misrepresent as fact.
What's telling is your determination in this thread. To an eye skeptical of the OP's claim, your strong belief that it should be protected from any kind of scrutiny is akin to religion.
I'll be leaving this thread alone now, it's suffered enough.
freemenorthants wrote:well it has worked and as i have no two party signed contract and not addressed to me but via blacks law, i am not a perosn, my account has been now credited correctly and do not now the anount calimed and so, yes did does work ones one fills in the payment slip correct wording and its worked 2 times this yr,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests