The basement

Moderator: x

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Stephen » Sun May 27, 2012 7:16 pm

I, me, I, me I, me, I have, me, I, me, me, I,I, I, myself I , me I have, me FF SAKE LISTEN TO YOURSELF! And you say that you


[quote="ForestNymph"] Don’t crow from the roof-tops. [/quote]

And ...

[quote="ForestNymph"] “nor do I blow my own trumpet” [/quote]

And as for keeping out of your business, don’t come here interfering in my business you dumb thicko.I didn’t ask you to comment on my posts. You chose to come here. You know why harris is hiding away here. So if you don’t like what you read you know what to do you sensitive little bum slurper.
Stephen
 

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Stephen » Sun May 27, 2012 9:15 pm

I, me, I, me I, me, I have, me, I, me, me, I,I, I, myself I , me I have, me FF SAKE LISTEN TO YOURSELF! And you say that you


[quote="ForestNymph"] Don’t crow from the roof-tops. [/quote]

And ...

[quote="ForestNymph"] “nor do I blow my own trumpet” [/quote]


Well if you make those kinds of hypocritical balls ups in court while playing the great defender no wonder you are lost for any words of substance GUMP.
hahahahhahahahhahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahhahahh
Stephen
 

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Stephen » Sun May 27, 2012 9:29 pm

Yes, well GUMP, we only have your word for that. And going by you nineteen faced track record and how you support both the liars HARRIS and the wooden top cretin Ben I wouldn’t believe you if you told me today was Sunday. So go away into your fantasy world of great crusading and let JOHNNY NO CAPS speak for himself.
Stephen
 

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Ben » Sun May 27, 2012 9:30 pm

stephanie wrote:Yes, well GUMP, we only have your word for that. And going by you nineteen faced track record and how you support both the liars HARRIS and the wooden top cretin Ben I wouldn’t believe you if you told me today was Sunday. So go away into your fantasy world of great crusading and let JOHNNY NO CAPS speak for himself.


Nutter alert.. Have you ever seen a picture of stephanie.. I have and he looks like a right nutter
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 12:58 am
Location: http://www.startmeoff.co.uk
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Stephen » Sun May 27, 2012 9:40 pm

.Fuck me, I only asked NO CAPS if he was ever going to write about his successes and such over the last 5 years or so , and in come the ring piece slurpers. What is the matter with you two?
Why are you so afraid to let bone head harris answer for himself? Why do you feel the great need to interlope and interfere with what may have been some interesting new revelations from the water walker harris?

Let the great saviour of the world speak for himself for once. I understand it's not hard; but you only make harris out to be dumber than he is already.
Stephen
 

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Ben » Sun May 27, 2012 9:47 pm

stephanie wrote:.Fuck me, I only asked NO CAPS if he was ever going to write about his successes and such over the last 5 years or so , and in come the ring piece slurpers. What is the matter with you two?
Why are you so afraid to let bone head harris answer for himself? Why do you feel the great need to interlope and interfere with what may have been some interesting new revelations from the water walker harris?

Let the great saviour of the world speak for himself for once. I understand it's not hard; but you only make harris out to be dumber than he is already.


Do you know the biggest thing you cant get into the vast expanse of a head of yours.. is John wont be on to answer your questions.

Yet you are still to stupid to pick that fact up.. This thread is now very boring and i think it needs cleaning... we should have taken the trash out a long time ago.
User avatar
Ben
Site Admin
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 12:58 am
Location: http://www.startmeoff.co.uk
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Stephen » Sun May 27, 2012 10:00 pm

That’s your opinion twat face. Harris seems to be loving it, he can’t make a post without a billion smilies.
You don’t have to come here. This is harris’ thread and your cretinism doesn’t count or belong on such an interesting thread. So fuck off if you don’t like it, you have all the rest of the forum to post on but you still come down here because no fucker else wants to speak to either of you. You because you’re a cretinous cunt; and GUMP because she is known for being the nineteen faced hypocrite she is. You’re a pair of lonely twats who haven’t got anything better to do. Go save the world you have been at it long enough to have learned something from your years of research.
Stephen
 

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby x » Sun May 27, 2012 10:28 pm

fairs..... fair...... :D x
x
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:26 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby 2ez » Sun May 27, 2012 11:24 pm

hi john,

i see a post over a week ago & i think it was from u? correct me if i'm wrong, but i also think u wer askin about common law in family courts? 2 which i cud possibly have the answer and u mite b able 2 varify it ( :
OOO WOTA TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE --- WEN 1ST WE PRACTICE 2 DECEIVE ( :
2ez
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 2:30 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: John James Harris - you sir are a cock

Postby Stephen » Mon May 28, 2012 10:38 pm

[quote="John Harris"]sorry i cannot place this.... maybe i need reminding.... x[/quote]


Mean while, let me remind you of something else JOHN. You said once, (yet another) friend of yours had a child returned to her by social services because she hadn’t registered this child and they had no rights to take the child away in the first place seeing that the child didn’t have a Birth Certificate and wasn’t registered with the state.. But they did in fact keep the other two they had taken into their care because these other two children had both been registered and both had Birth certificates.
So, what proof can you offer on this fabrication JOHN? I believe this to be something else you just heard and ran with it because it suited your theme of registering children and other things with the state.

And notice JOHN, I use the word WITH and not TO.
Stephen
 

PreviousNext

Return to The Dungeon

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests