The basement

[x]

sorry i cannot place this.... maybe i need reminding.... x

Mean while, let me remind you of something else JOHN. You said once, (yet another) friend of yours had a child returned to her by social services because she hadn’t registered this child and they had no rights to take the child away in the first place seeing that the child didn’t have a Birth Certificate and wasn’t registered with the state.. But they did in fact keep the other two they had taken into their care because these other two children had both been registered and both had Birth certificates.
So, what proof can you offer on this fabrication JOHN? I believe this to be something else you just heard and ran with it because it suited your theme of registering children and other things with the state.

And notice JOHN, I use the word WITH and not TO.

those who know..... know and those who don't surmise that what is known as truth..... isn't..... simple answer to your question is why not ring the social services yourself and ask..... for what ever i say to you stephen will never suffice..... no matter what i say...... x

[Stephen]

[quote="John Harris"] simple answer to your question is why not ring the social services yourself and ask..........[/quote]



Well JOHN, unlike yourself, I did look into this statement of yours; I rang three different social service departments; and my findings were (surprise, surprise) that it was yet more baloney issuing from you.
This is why I have asked you, if you can prove or verify what must be one of your odder statements?
I can tell you this, BC or no BC, if a child is knowingly being abused it will be taken from the parents. And simple common sense (should you possess any) should tell you this. I mean, are you actually trying to tell us that when the social services know beyond all reasonable doubt, that a child is being abused, that they will not step in and remove the child at risk simply because the parents hadn’t registered the baby?
Are you saying that because the child wasn’t registered at birth social services would wash their hands of the matter and leave the child to its fate?





[quote="John Harris"] for what ever i say to you stephen will never suffice..... no matter what i say.....[/quote]

Sit down before you read any further JOHN. Because ........there are quite a few things where I am in total agreement with you.

[losecontrol]

Question for JH: What time is it? have we reached the year 2000 yet?

[Stephen]

[quote="losecontrol"]Question for JH: What time is it? have we reached the year 2000 yet?[/quote]


look at your post it has the DAY, TIME AND THEY YEAR RIGHT NEXT TO YOUR USERNAME!
by losecontrol » Thu May 31, 2012 4:32 pm

[Stephen]

[quote="losecontrol"]Question for JH:[/quote]

Wouls you have us believe, that when the social services know beyond all reasonable doubt, that a child is being abused, that they will not step in and remove the child at risk simply because the parents hadn’t registered the baby?
Are you saying that because the child wasn’t registered at birth social services would wash their hands of the matter and leave the child to its fate?

[losecontrol]

Stephen..I am quite aware of the generally accepted time.
If you had bothered to read the subject thread...
John James Harris - you sir are a clock you would see I was alluding to something quite different.

[Stephen]

[quote="John Harris"] simple answer to your question is why not ring the social services yourself and ask..... x[/quote]



Well JOHN, unlike yourself, I did look into this statement of yours; I rang three different social service departments; and my findings were (surprise, surprise) that it was yet more baloney issuing from you.
This is why I have asked you, if you can prove or verify what must be one of your odder statements?
I can tell you this, BC or no BC, if a child is knowingly being abused it will be taken from the parents. And simple common sense (should you possess any) should tell you this. I mean, are you actually trying to tell us that when the social services know beyond all reasonable doubt, that a child is being abused, that they will not step in and remove the child at risk simply because the parents hadn’t registered the baby?
Are you saying that because the child wasn’t registered at birth social services would wash their hands of the matter and leave the child to its fate?

[Stephen]

[quote="losecontrol"]If you had bothered to read the subject thread...
.[/quote]

I am sorry, I thought Harris had changed the title of this thread from.. Look it's me! John! John Harris look! Ask Me Anything! Yes! It's Really Me! Look,Yes,It's me, John! Ask Me John Harris! But on realising what a cock he had made of himself, he then decided to give it the new title of John Harris, You sir are a Cock.
I didn’t realize that anyone could change the title of harris’ thread.!
I have only be going along with the theme of harris’ thread and pointing out why I think harris is indeed the cock he agrees he is.
I do apologise, losecontrol.

[losecontrol]

Well thankyou for your contrition Stephen, that was unexpected, given the general tone of the thread.

There seems to be quite a lot of 'in-fighting' on these boards and elsewhere.
I abhor negative vibes, as there are too few of us already, to alienate and divide further.
Whilst we quibble for the pyrrhic high ground, amongst ourselves, the power elites, continue on and on with their agenda.

Stephen do you have any solutions? just want a bit of positivity for a change.

[Stephen]

[quote="losecontrol"]Stephen do you have any solutions? just want a bit of positivity for a change.[/quote]



Yes, I do have a solution that fits me and mine just fine. And this is where I totally agree with NO CAPS;
If you feel and know in your heart of hearts that you are being well and truly shafted by these psycho's, just say NO and be brave enough to suffer the consequences, whatever they may be.


[quote="losecontrol"]I abhor negative vibes, as there are too few of us already, to alienate and divide further.
[/quote]

Yes, well, that is all very well you saying that. But when I came to tpuc asking questions I got plenty of negativity from old established members who didn’t like it; and still don’t. They were willing to pile new lies on top of old lies rather than admit that NO CAPS was wrong on just about every statement he made in his vids.
These vids will get someone killed one day, but NO CAPS is too blind to see this. One day, they will find some young kid hanging in his cell because he couldn’t hack it, and all as a direct result of the lies, bull-shit and
disinformation NO CAPS spouts in his videos. NO CAPS says his videos are serving a purpose, but when asked what is the purpose? He can’t or won’t answer. Surely he knows the purpose and is able to explain how the disinformation and lies in his videos are serving a purpose?
You just remember; this is the man who didn’t even look at his own Birth Certificate before telling others that it was via the BC that we were all duped and enslaved “this is the truth” he said, “I only deal in fact, it is either black or it’s white, and I only deal with fact” he says, “this is why I want to tell you about it” he says.
But on and around the clock his videos go, still spouting what even HE knows to be bullshit. He has no shame, no conscience and no regrets or remorse.
So you tell me, am I being negative by asking questions or is NO CAPS being negative by allowing his videos to perpetually continue spewing out lies, deceit and very very flawed information?

Nice talking to you.