i could be wrong but i think that it is a bait and switch, despite the 'apparent terrorist attacks' during the last 12 years leading up to the olympics, it would still be difficult in the eyes of the common people to justify military personnel doing all
of the security for the games but and i admit i could be wrong but-if say a company like G4S was contracted to do most of the security and then they don't manage to recruit enough staff to cover the numbers needed to fulfill said contract... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18837524And
if the staff they do have seem unreliable and unlikely to actually turn up and perform the duties they are contracted for..http://www.itv.com/news/2012-07-13/six- ... -weymouth/
...then perhaps that was the plan all along, it is entirely possible i think that g4s could lose the contract and would have to be replaced entirely by military personnel (and some police of course) at seemingly short notice.
then tptb can come out and say "this wasn't preplanned honest guv."
i still think something is going to happen (though i hope not) and if it does (or if it is seeming stopped by the military)-then it gives them the excuse to roll out militarization/martial law and if you don't know what it was like to live in northern ireland then i think we are about to find out, it also gives the tptb a good way to quickly deal with any protests and riots in the future etc-very very clever methinks (if true)
plus i can't help but notice that there have been a hell of a lot of adverts for the territorial
army recently-perhaps that is somehow connected?
what do you think? please vote now (you can change your vote if you wish and please mods-don't move this to the conspiracy forum-it's too important!)
edit: skipper i just saw your post-sorry but i'm glad to see it isn't just me thinking this