FIRST RED CAR SEIZED

[frogmanbrabs]

It's said that where statutes and acts of parliament are concerned nowadays the queen's consent is automatic. This means that HRH is not doing her job.

[HVYMTL]

Yup, which is why John's Affidavit in accordance with the law, presumes innocence on her part and claims that she has been induced into unlawful captivity by "diverse evil persons".

As in we have been conquered as a country and it was an inside job.

This is why I feel like I ought to be doing something because my family motto literally means "For Our Unconquered Country".

It seems that over 800 years ago the eventuality of the situation we are in was planned for and my family chosen to carry the tools down the ages to use the law and put things back as they should be.

There is just one problem, and that is that I am flying by the seat of my pants, have very little clue exactly how such a thing is meant to be done, and usually people just get pissed off with me and think I have delusions of grandeur when I try and talk about it.

Monty Python could not of come up with a more ridiculous situation!

I'm doing my best to research and understand, and I've deliberately thrown myself into the situation with the "HVY MTL" car in order to get some answers.

Maybe I won't like the answers when they come.

Maybe all I will achieve is getting myself a criminal record and hefty fine, which since I won't be able to pay it will probably result in me getting put in prison.

At least my employment prospects won't be effected. Quite apart from the fact that I'm currently practically unemployable anyway, when I do finally get my s*** sorted out, as a Computer Programmer it's very unlikely a prospective employer will ask at interview if I have a criminal record or not, it's just not the sort of thing that comes up. They are far more likely to ask whether I prefer Star Trek or Star Wars!

From all the above you can infer that I am attempting to save the Queen. The problem there is the fact that I'm not God, I'm not even Brian, and I'm not entirely certain that John's Affidavit is right or that the Queen needs saving at all.

It's just a good thing that I am good at dealing with uncertainty and logically ruling out possibilities in order to derive the truth, whatever that may be.

[neilblockhead]

Hi HVY MTL.
This text seems really interesting, "The Pied Pipers of Babylon", which you can download for free from the internet (http://commonlawjurisdiction.wordpress.com/). It's awhole book written by a Doctor in Common Law!!
Yes I understand what you say about people thinking you weird whaen you talk about these things!!
But that's what TPUC is for, giving you support and encouragement., and advice too perhaps, though we are all flying by the seat of....
As to God, well I have no problem with that. If we beleive we are just human created, there is no divinity in ourselves, then to me that would mean they are perhaps right - they are human and they are in charge, they have more strength, they have more power. However if we are God created, we are divine, we are unique, and we are equal in the eyes of God, and they too have to wait upon God's judgement.
I think if you go into court (you don't have to!! Maybe this would be your biggest mistake) and claim Commonlaw, then you can ask for a jury. I think you should perhaps ask Roger Hayes to help you out/represent you in court.
Great respect for your struggle, keep at it!
Neil

[frogmanbrabs]

HVYMTL if you go into the court trying to claim common law jurisdiction they will just ignore you and fine you in your absence like they did to me. Why not save yourself a day in court and just let them fine you and when you receive the charge notice reply with a conditional offer of acceptance like I did. Give them 7 days to reply and when they don't (cos they think you're joking) follow up with a notice of non response and lawful estoppel. This means that they have no further recourse in a court of law as they have dishonoured themselves. You are trying to find a remedy hence the conditional offer. If they refuse to acknowledge your offer they are in dishonour. Simples

[HVYMTL]

I suspect you'll be encountering a bailiff at some point doing it that way.

[HVYMTL]

I won't be making any arguments with them about common law, I know they are not going to care about that. They actually got someone to stand in for the judge and ask me if I was a FREEMAN ON THE LAND, instead of seeing magistrates because "they are just ordinary people who sometimes get confused" ~ his words not mine!

I believe that applying what I've just learned by reading "The Art of the Loophole" by Nick Freeman aka MR LOOPHOLE the most notorious defence lawyer in the UK, I will be able to get the case dismissed. Dunno, just going to have to see what happens on the day of the battle. Their case is so full of holes, I'm not sure which one I'm going to use yet.

It's available on Amazon by the way!

[frogmanbrabs]

It's over 12 months now since I first used the above method and no sign of the Bay Leafs yet. It's now 3 months since the 2nd time.

[HVYMTL]

Well that does sound promising, but I'm still going to go to court even if it's just to further examine the way they behave and what they have to say.

[neilblockhead]

Yes I have been told that they have been given a set way of dealing with the appeal as a Freeman/Commonlaw and they just railroad you.
If you want to chat to someone who has an expert Skype group on this, try Nigel, whose Skype ID is: nigeltaylor1718.
I am sure they would be very oiterested and could give you their opinions.
All the bestest HVYMTL

[HVYMTL]

3 days to go before the court date.

I'm still planning on going, and as I mentioned I'm not going to be arguing about names or PUNCTUATIONS or types of law or anything like that.

I'm not sure exactly what I am going to argue, it's going to depend very much how the battle goes when they make their opening moves.

I agree that it looks likely they have put defences in place to prevent FREEMEN ON THE LAND from going straight into the magistrates and confusing them. Clearly they are looking to keep their low level functionaries (the magistrates) out of the fray by confronting people they believe to be a FMOTL (like myself) before they have chance to see magistrates.

Luckily, probably thanks to my being a slow deep thinker rather than a quick witted sharp shooter, the first encounter left them thinking I was some sort of idiot criminal that they could happily throw to the magistrates without worrying about it.

Advantage : ODELL!

The prosecutor even said he hadn't heard anything to damage his case, implying that if I had been sharper in that moment I probably could of derailed their case right there and then. That wasn't my intention however because I already planned from the start to LOSE at magistrates level, hence the reason my fee schedule states my time to be 5x more expensive at crown court level, which is where I fully intend to take the matter!

If I walk out of there in 3 days time having achieved nothing but a dismissal of the case, I will be quite disappointed and definitely in need of finding another plan to have a crack at getting a case into the crown court. Plus I will also be down one nice little Hyundai Accent, having gained no ground at all for the Rebellion.

I don't know, all I know is that I'm feeling far calmer and more sure of what I'm doing than at any point in the last 2 and half years that I've been involved with this movement and the Lawful Rebellion.