The Controversial Person

Forum rules
The articles and opinions written on this website , might not reflect the views of the site, We do not give legal advice and in no way are we responsible for what is written by our members

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby kazz67 » Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:45 am

TheStoge wrote:The answer is simple. As you hover the mouse over the 'insert buttons' on the menu bar, a caption window will pop up showing the usage perameter. in this case, Youtube, it asks for video ID number.
So, here is the URL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsirLliYBXk
The video ID number is the portion after the = sign, DsirLliYBXk
I do hope that you will remember to share what you have found out completely in the future too.
;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsirLliYBXk



Actually it's easier than that (specially for those of us that don't have an 'insert buttons' option on our menu bars!). - Above the text box where we type our posts there are several options including a youtube button. Click that and you'll see this - [youtube][/youtube] - in the middle of which you insert the youtube video id thing (the series of letters and numbers that follow the = sign).

Hope that helps.

Peace, love, unity.
Kazz. xx
We trade natural freedoms for access to the protection of the law. When that access is denied, then the contract is broken and all bets are off. There is no obligation for one side to fulfil their part when the other refuses to. - Slimline66
User avatar
kazz67
 
Posts: 5700
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:27 am
Location: Liverpool
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby TheStoge » Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:40 pm

That's what the YouTube button is, an insert a youtube clip button ..{as any clip inserter will find out .. LoL}
Click that and you'll see this - [youtube][/youtube]
..this was better explained I concede ...
In future I'll keep my head down and my mouth shut boss !! ..(sorry gaffer ... Hahaha) :D
So, here is the URL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsirLliYBXk
The video ID number is the portion after the = sign, DsirLliYBXk

Click the button and you'll see this when you insert the video ID code - [youtube]DsirLliYBXk[/youtube]

... but don't do it in bold, that was just so you could see what you have to do .. ;)
{..am I in for a cuffing now !!} :D :D

Stoge edits ... You are absolutely right Kazz, they are just menu bar buttons ;) ,
Edit : no need te git smaard aboud et lah ! :D
Stoge packs it in now then, editing.
... like, me own personal coppers are even calling me a journo and it's too dirty a job, investigating the police mentality.

I reckon it would be a good idea to have a specialist department and I would nominate you as editor. My idea is to form a team called {wait for it ..} P.I.G. :|

The Police Investigation Group :P ... {will you stop giggling} :lol: These are a group of maveric "Journoes", as they have already been labelled by the police, investigate police forum discussions in order that the overall attitudes and discussions about the latest additions to thier PACE manuals, and how to use and implement them against ignorant members of the population.

That's my definition of the acronym. What was that latin spoof about bizzies and journoes again ? .. B/J therefore J<>B ergo, J=B^-1 erg et J/B ... in scouse of course ! ;) Say dat in friggin legalese den your honor, do you get me like ? :D
Justice for Maurice Kirk Petition.
TPTB Divide and Conquer … So we must Unite to Win …. Simples !! :-)
P.I.G. - Justice for all REGARDLESS !!
User avatar
TheStoge
 
Posts: 2416
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby kazz67 » Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:02 pm

TheStoge wrote:That's what the YouTube button is, an insert a youtube clip button ..{as any clip inserter will find out .. LoL}
Click that and you'll see this - [youtube][/youtube]
..this was better explained I concede ...


I know. :roll:


In future I'll keep my head down and my mouth shut boss !! ..(sorry gaffer ... Hahaha) :D


Just boss will be fine... gaffer doesn't suit me.

So, here is the URL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsirLliYBXk
The video ID number is the portion after the = sign, DsirLliYBXk

Click the button and you'll see this when you insert the video ID code - [youtube]DsirLliYBXk[/youtube]

... but don't do it in bold, that was just so you could see what you have to do .. ;)
{..am I in for a cuffing now !!} :D :D


A cuffing is the least of your worries. - I'll retract your diploma if you're not careful and replace it with a "first class div degree"! ...


Stoge edits ... You are absolutely right Kazz, they are just menu bar buttons ;) ,
Edit : no need te git smaard aboud et lah ! :D
Stoge packs it in now then, editing.


and now the world can now see why! :lol:

... like, me own personal coppers are even calling me a journo and it's too dirty a job, investigating the police mentality.

I reckon it would be a good idea to have a specialist department and I would nominate you as editor. My idea is to form a team called {wait for it ..} P.I.G. :|

The Police Investigation Group :P ... {will you stop giggling} :lol: These are a group of maveric "Journoes", as they have already been labelled by the police, investigate police forum discussions in order that the overall attitudes and discussions about the latest additions to thier PACE manuals, and how to use and implement them against ignorant members of the population.


Why not start a thread to recruit volunteers..? Invite people to PM you, if you want to get really stealth about it. :D

That's my definition of the acronym. What was that latin spoof about bizzies and journoes again ? .. B/J therefore J<>B ergo, J=B^-1 erg et J/B ... in scouse of course ! ;) Say dat in friggin legalese den your honor, do you get me like ? :D


Ya wha'??? :?


Now, on with the mod's hat: Stop high jacking this very important thread or I'll have to delete you! :mrgreen:

Peace, love, unity.
Kazz. xxx
We trade natural freedoms for access to the protection of the law. When that access is denied, then the contract is broken and all bets are off. There is no obligation for one side to fulfil their part when the other refuses to. - Slimline66
User avatar
kazz67
 
Posts: 5700
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:27 am
Location: Liverpool
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby bulldogger » Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:46 pm

I read it and enjoyed it, I just wish it was more in depth and detailed, but overall a good primer for the layman. :)

One thing I would recommend is getting someone to proof read it, there were many typos, I would have done this for you but it didn't occur to me until I was near the end.

Thanks for sharing it with me.
Disclaimer: Everything I write is written in a friendly tone as if talking with one of my mates, I'm not responsible for hurt feelings if someone is suffering from sensitivity issues. MITAKUYE OYASIN
bulldogger
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:29 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby TheStoge » Sat Aug 29, 2009 7:34 pm

... :D
Last edited by TheStoge on Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Justice for Maurice Kirk Petition.
TPTB Divide and Conquer … So we must Unite to Win …. Simples !! :-)
P.I.G. - Justice for all REGARDLESS !!
User avatar
TheStoge
 
Posts: 2416
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby wiking » Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:46 am

Finally got the time to read all that.

Perhaps more attention could be applied to the very confusing
'Natural Person' being defined as a human being/man enjoined
by choice with a legal fiction.

Here in NSW Australia the definitions act has equivalency with
Person = Natural Person = Individual

That is they point to each other in legislation.

Nice analogy with Common Law as being the trunk of the tree with
statute as the branches. For a tree can lose and regrow its branches
but the trunk always remains. Sometimes the tree needs a lot of pruning
to get it healthy!

Just some thoughts on a great effort and excellent read :)
wiking
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:44 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby macswin » Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:58 pm

wiking wrote:Finally got the time to read all that.

Perhaps more attention could be applied to the very confusing
'Natural Person' being defined as a human being/man enjoined
by choice with a legal fiction.

Here in NSW Australia the definitions act has equivalency with
Person = Natural Person = Individual

That is they point to each other in legislation.

Nice analogy with Common Law as being the trunk of the tree with
statute as the branches. For a tree can lose and regrow its branches
but the trunk always remains. Sometimes the tree needs a lot of pruning
to get it healthy!

Just some thoughts on a great effort and excellent read :)


Thanks wiking for reading it and leaving your comments. i understand what you say about the confusion....what i tried to say (probably to subtly) was that a "person" is more like a vehicle for rights...so if you expect to have rights then you are a person under the eyes of the law. humans or corporations are just about the only entities that have rights

Thanks for your input...it is most welcomed

Regards

Macswin
Only the educated are free. Epictetus
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use. Kierkegaard
Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one. Nietzsche
macswin
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 3:37 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby scary_document » Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:13 am

URGENT NEED TO SEE DOCUMENT

sorry for that header, but people need to see this

http://www.laquadrature.net/files/201001_acta.pdf

there are many extremely scary things in this document... mainly about free speech

BUT LOOK AT PAGE 2

go to where it talks about the difference between a natural and juridical person

THEY ARE ADMITTING IT IN THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS

this document is also being passed in secret... sorry about the brashness... but people NEED TO SEE THIS

also... experienced people please read this document and report on what you think... it has scared me
scary_document
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:07 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby markie b » Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:16 am

scary_document wrote:URGENT NEED TO SEE DOCUMENT

sorry for that header, but people need to see this

http://www.laquadrature.net/files/201001_acta.pdf

there are many extremely scary things in this document... mainly about free speech

BUT LOOK AT PAGE 2

go to where it talks about the difference between a natural and juridical person

THEY ARE ADMITTING IT IN THEIR OWN DOCUMENTS

this document is also being passed in secret... sorry about the brashness... but people NEED TO SEE THIS

also... experienced people please read this document and report on what you think... it has scared me


sounds scary il go take a look :shock: brb
Image Image
markie b
 
Posts: 1997
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:21 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: The Controversial Person

Postby mrresonate » Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:46 pm

nice
If we (8% freemen) are as intelligent as we say and think (we will, no doubt) get the (90% dupes) on board and destroy this system owned by the (2% elite) PEACE

http://theagecases.blogspot.com/
User avatar
mrresonate
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Brighton & Hove
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Return to (E)books, Articles, Documents & links

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests