2013 Freedom Day

[emmanualgoldstein]

On the 1st of November 2013, it will have been exactly 20 years since Her Majesty gave up sovereignty over the people of the British Isles as the Maastricht Treaty came into effect. On that day certain rights and obligations were extinguished for both Her Majesty and the Majesties former subjects, with the effect that certain rights and obligations were created. On the 1st of November 2013 these obligations, if unchallenged before then will continue in perpetuity, and the rights will become unchallengable.

Amongst these rights, a central right must be that since Her Majesty rejects our requests to act as sovereign, sovereignty must remain with those requesting that Her Majesty perform this role. This leads to a rather divisive place as, having no common sovereign, the break up of the people of the Great Britain becomes a dangerous reality.

Though there are many who will no doubt insist quite lawfully upon keeping this personal sovereignty which has fell to them due to the unwillingness of Her Majesty to continue in this role, there are significantly more who, quite unaware of the repercussions of the Maastricht Treaty, let alone what a treaty is, who are in danger of giving up their sovereignty for ignorance of what sovereignty is.

I would like to recommend that we set about finding a suitable Majesty willing to fill this role, who will exercise the sovereignty confided in them justly, wisely and in perpetuity.

[kazz67]

Hi EG,

I thought this was quite an interesting post... right up until the last sentence when it completely unravelled!

As dangerous as it may seem, I require no sovereign majesty but myself (nor did I before Maastricht).

And even if this weren't the case for myself and, I dare say, many others, how do you propose such a task as finding and electing, by popular mandate I presume, be undertaken?

It strikes me that even if this could be achieved, what would ultimately be achieved would be the perpetuation of a hierarchical system of ruler over ruled. - a case of 'the more things change, the more they stay the same'..?

Just my initial thoughts on what you've posted.
I look forward to seeing how this one develops.

Peace, love, unity.
Kazz. xxx

[emmanualgoldstein]

I definitely agree with your stance Kazz, particularly the point about your sovereignty having never been given up in the first place, but you're a woman of understanding, which is something that cant be said for the vast majority of people out there.

A vast majority which now sadly no longer knows the difference between human experimentation and medical treatment and would expect that we conform to their lunacy. If they must conform to something, then let it be something they have knowingly and willingly chosen rather than something like wool pulled over their eyes.

[Shianna]

Just a suggestion. I dont know the implications of this but if it came down to it, would not the Austarlian farmer who is apparently the 'real' heir to our kingdom be the obvious choice. And being an Aussie, (who are always up for a referendum) would that not be poetic justice? Shi

[emmanualgoldstein]

The aussie farmer is unwilling.

[king-william]

does that mean i get the palace an such.......i dont mind getting the rack out of the tower for the rothschilds...ive got it all planned public hangings the lot...........national big spliff day...........

[emmanualgoldstein]

lol its more like the big split has already occurred but is still curable before 2013. After that it will take another conquest of the british isles to enforce any sovereign state. Given that the right of conquest is no longer recognised according to the UN charter, this cannot be done either. There remains an outstanding issue regarding the fact that stateless persons have been created by the maastricht treaty where the sovereignty of the UK was dissolved.