Children in "Proper Need".
I have been asked by John to write a article, which I shall do as soon as time permits, about the Children in Proper Need in our own country.
Who are they? Where do they live? All, hopefully will soon be revealed. Let me just say for now that before we start worrying about undernurished kids in Africa, about kids stuck away in Mental Asylums in Eastern Europe, we should address the concerns of our own children (and there are many of them) who are being forceably removed from loving familes by our own Social Services, who acting on behalf of Local Authorities, who in turn recieve money from Central Government, to place as many so-called "at risk" children into care. With an eventual aim of adoption.
Why is this happening? We don't know the real agenda behind it yet, but this is something that the TPUC will do it's utmost to find out.




Children in Proper Need - family law
It's not just the social services that are damaging children's lives, it's the degenerate family law regime. The combined evil principles of 'no-fault' divorce and 'childs best interests' (used to take control of children from pefectly decent parents, are destroying families and (especially) men's faith in human nature. If you don't agree, read my book advertised on TPUC homepage.
Barry.
Kids in proper need
There have been a number of high profile (and not so high profile) cases in recent years where children have been removed from their natural parents under what appear to be dubious circumstances. Given the kind of people that are attracted to work in social services, i.e. increasingly left-liberal and obsessed with political correctness, I would not be surprised to find that children are being removed in order to satisfy NuLabour's politically expedient targets.
There has also been a nuber of publicised cases where children have been left in position with their natural family at considerable obvious risk. Ironically this would appear to be a result of the same PC motivation. The case of Victoria Climbie springs to mind, but is by no means exceptional. This poor child was left to suffer because her caseworker considered that she may open to accusations of racism had she taken decisive action. Likewise, it was recently revealed that a male child placed with a homosexual couple (who had stipulated that they only wanted to foster male children) had been subjected to sexual abuse over which there had been, once again, a PC motivated attempted cover-up.
It strikes me that there is nothing that NuLabour and its left-liberal "progressives” have had their grubby mitts on that has not been turned into an appalling shambles.
Sandie was right in his/her original premise; we need to take a serious look at our domestic affairs before we worry about the problems of those in other countries. The Westminster government is elected, and taxes paid, for the governance of Britain in the interest of its people, not those of the rest of the world.
Before you campaign for
Before you campaign for children to remain where they are, perhaps you should learn a little about those who remain when it is clear to all but Social Services that they should have been removed many years ago.
Such as the three year old boy, trapped in a bedroom he shared with two siblings where the door handle had been fitted upsidedown in order to prevent him leaving until his mother or one of her boyfriends wanted to abuse him.
Social Services visited, yet did nothing.
It was an operation by the FBI that finally revealed the danger he was in. The FBI were investigating child pornography and their global investigation led them to the house where this little boy lived, if you can call his miserable existance living that is.
According to one of the arresting officers (a UK police officer) the child, along with his siblings, would be back with their mother within days, if not hours, despiter her obvious involvement in their abuse.
There are many more things you can do with your obvious energy and enthusiasm, so stop wasting your time and do something that matters for people who need your help.
Before you campaign for
Thank you for your reply, "Anonymous". I am fully aware that sometimes, removing the child(ren) from families is the only answer. I am not saying that vevery time the Social Services take children that they are wrong to do so. What I am saying, is, that British Kids ARE being removed from obviously loving and careing homes all to often.
You seem to be on the ball with this subject, therefore, perhaps you would care to enlighten us further?
I am only going by what a Grandparent has told me of her own personal situation. I do not know the family myself, and have only exchanged e.mails and telephone calls with the lady. I believe her to be telling me the truth. Which, until proved differently, is all we can do.Regards, Sandie.
Children in proper need
To put as many as possible with families that are Government friendly maybe?
Children in Proper Need.
Thank you, Ernie, for your reply. Yes, My Friend, I think that could certainly be one of the reasons. I'm sure there are others, but it's not going to be very easy to find them. Regards, Sandie.